• 1. Department of Emergency, The Fourth Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang 110032, China;2. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shengyang 110004, China;
ZHU Jie, Email: cmu4h-zhujie@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To systemically review the effectiveness and safety of human recombinant activated protein C (rhAPC) for severe sepsis.
Methods  Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI and CBM were electronically searched for comprehensively collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness and safety of human recombinant activated protein C (rhAPC) for severe sepsis from inception to July 2012. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software.
Results  Totally, five RCTs involving 6 307 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, no significant difference was found in 28-day mortality (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.84 to 1.19, P=1.00) and 90-day mortality (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.14, P=0.96) between the rhAPC group and the placebo group. The results of subgroup analysis showed that, the two groups were similar in the 28-day mortality of patients with different Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores (APACHE II score lt;25: RR=1.06, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.21, P=0.37; APACHE II score≥25: RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.69 to 1.24, P=0.60), and in the 28-day mortality by protein C deficiency class (APC deficiency lt;80%: RR=0.96, 95%CI 0.56 to 1.65, P=0.89; APC deficiency gt;80%: RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.34 to 1.08, P=0.09). Besides, bleeding risk in the rhAPC group was 1.62 fold more than that in the placebo group (RR=1.62, 95%CI 1.17 to 2.23, P=0.004). No significant difference was found in the incidence of adverse reaction (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.18, P=0.53).
Conclusion  Current evidence suggests that, rhAPC could not improve the prognosis of patients with severe sepsis, but it significantly increases bleeding risk.

Citation: WANG Qian,ZHAO Yang,ZHU Jie. Human Recombinant Activated Protein C for Severe Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013, 13(11): 1333-1339. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20130229 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET Dual Time Point Scan in Identifying Benign and Malignant Lung Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
  • Next Article

    Linezolid versus Teicoplanin for MRSA Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis