Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To systematically review anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs on visual acuity in patients with central vetinal vein occlnsion-macular edema (CRVO-ME). Methods Databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2012), EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about anti-VEGF drugs on visual acuity in patients with CRVO-ME from the date of establishment of the databases to December 2012. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. The quality of evidence was analyzed using GRADEpro 3.6 software. Results A total 9 trials involving 1 072 patients (1 072 eyes) were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, anti-VEGF injection, compared with sham injection, increased BCVA score measured by ETDRS (MD=16.27, 95%CI 9.98 to 22.55, P < 0.000 01); decreased CFT score measured by OCT (MD=245.25, 95%CI 136.02 to 354.48, P < 0.000 1); gained more than 15 letters in BCVA (OR=4.43, 95% CI 2.23 to 8.83, P < 0.000 1); and the long term anti-VEGF effect index, gained no less than 15 letters in BCVA (OR=2.25, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.23, P < 0.000 1). The score of short term BCVA changes was of intermediate quality, while another three outcomes were of low quality in the GRADE system. Conclusion Current evidence shows that, anti-VEGF drugs could improve the visual acuity of patients with CRVO-ME. The clinicians could recommend this kind of drugs to the patients. Due to the limitations of the included studies, more large-sample multicentre high-quality RCTs are required to verify its effectiveness.

Citation: GUOBie-chuan, KEMin, TIANZhen, WANGPing, QIAOChen. Efficacy of Anti-VEGF Drugs on Visual Acuity in Patients with Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2014, 14(1): 44-51. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20140009 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Effectiveness and Safety of Indapamide versus CCBs for Hypertension: A Systematic Review
  • Next Article

    Effectiveness and Safety of Postoperative GnRH-a versus Laparoscopy Alone for Endometriosis: A Meta-Analysis