JU Chunxiao 1,3 , ZHANG Yao 1,3 , LIU Xiaolin 2,3 , LI Yiwen 2,5 , LIU Lu 1,3 , WANG Biqing 1,3 , MEI Jun 3,4 , ZHAO Junnan 3,4 , HUANG Luqi 6 , LIU Yue 3,5 , XU Fengqin 3,4
  • 1. Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, P.R.China;
  • 2. Graduate School, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, P.R.China;
  • 3. Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100091, P.R.China;
  • 4. Institute of Gerontology, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100091, P.R.China;
  • 5. National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Beijing 100091, P.R.China;
  • 6. China Center for Evidence-Based Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100078, P.R.China;
LIU Yue, Email: liuyue@188.com; XU Fengqin, Email: doctorxu@aliyun.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus of chronic heart failure domestically and abroad.Methods PubMed, EMbase, SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases, and related websites were searched to collect guidelines and expert consensus on chronic heart failure published from January 1st, 2011 to December 31st, 2020. Four reviewers evaluated the methodological quality of the guidelines and expert consensus with the AGREE Ⅱ tool after the consistency evaluation training.Results A total of 17 studies were included (consisting of 11 English and 6 Chinese studies). The recommended levels were B level (recommend after modification) for 10 studies and C level (not recommended) for 7 studies. The AGREE Ⅱ standardized mean scores for various fields were 69.61% (scope and purpose), 34.20% (stakeholder involvement), 33.13% (rigor of development), 84.53% (clarity and presentation), 42.40% (applicability), and 37.09% (editorial independence). The methodological quality of English guidelines was generally high (level B for 10 and level C for 1), while all scores of Chinese guidelines or consensus in the 6 fields were mostly lower than the average (level C for 6).Conclusions The guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure requires further improvement in terms of stakeholder involvement and rigor of development. It should develop standards and methods to improve the quality for Chinese guidelines and expert consensus to better serve clinical practice.

Citation: JU Chunxiao, ZHANG Yao, LIU Xiaolin, LI Yiwen, LIU Lu, WANG Biqing, MEI Jun, ZHAO Junnan, HUANG Luqi, LIU Yue, XU Fengqin. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus for chronic heart failure. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(9): 1091-1097. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202104066 Copy

  • Previous Article

    The preventive effects of breastfeeding on progression to pre-diabetes mellitus (DM) and DM among females with prior gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Application of interrupted time series analysis in hospital scientific research incentive