An introduction of the JBI scoping review execution process_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

LIU Yanli ¹ , WU Caizhi ² , WANG Zhe ¹ , HU Kaiyan ¹ , DING Fengxing ¹ , LIU Chen ¹ , YI Shaowei ¹ , RUAN Jianhua ¹ , LUO Yating ² ,  XIE Guangmei ³ ,  MA Bin ¹

1. Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
2. The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
3. Gansu Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (Gansu Province Central Hospital), Lanzhou 730050, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

XIE Guangmei, Email: xgm721201@163.com; MA Bin, Email: mab@lzu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Scoping review; JBI; Methodology; Evidence synthesis

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202311060

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Scoping review are intended to help researchers in complex and extensive fields can better address exploratory research questions, comprehensive and systematic understanding of the current development of a field. However, the current scoping review needs to be unified in the implementation process, and the emergence of the JBI scope review execution process can well solve this problem, which combines and improves the framework of the previous execution process, and regulates the whole process of scoping review production in depth and comprehensively from the aspects of the research purpose and questions, inclusion criteria, search, screening, data extraction, and analysis of the results, etc., and it has a strong authority and professionalism. Therefore, in order to help researchers better carry out and implement the scoping review, this paper focuses on the JBI scoping review execution process, and through detailed interpretation of the JBI scoping review execution process and demonstration of examples, it provides references for researchers to correctly apply the JBI scoping review execution process, in order to enhance the transparency and reliability of the research results, and to promote the scientific application of scoping review in China.

1.	Wang Y, Zhu S, Liu C, et al. Text mining and hub gene network analysis of endometriosis. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021: 5517145.
2.	Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, et al. What kind of systematic review should I conduct. A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2018, 18(1): 5.
3.	Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review. Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2018, 18(1): 143.
4.	Aucoin M, LaChance L, Naidoo U, et al. Diet and anxiety: a scoping review. Nutrients, 2021, 13(12): 4418.
5.	Gagliardi AR, Alhabib S. Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review. Implement Sci, 2015, 10: 54.
6.	Ost K, Duquesne L, Duguay C, et al. Large-scale infectious disease testing programs have little consideration for equity: findings from a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol, 2022, 143: 30-60.
7.	Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth, 2020, 18(10): 2119-2126.
8.	Koene J, Zyto S, van der Stel J, et al. The relations between executive functions and occupational functioning in individuals with bipolar disorder: a scoping review. Int J Bipolar Disord, 2022, 10(1): 8.
9.	Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014, 67(12): 1291-1294.
10.	Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2013, 13: 48.
11.	Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies. A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud, 2009, 46(10): 1386-1400.
12.	Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J, 2009, 26(2): 91-108.
13.	Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci, 2010, 5: 69.
14.	王喜益, 叶志弘, 汤磊雯. 范围综述在护理领域的应用进展. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(8): 1259-1263.
15.	Peters MDJ. Chapter 11: scoping reviews. 2017.
16.	Peters MDJ. Chapter 11: scoping reviews (2020 version). 2020.
17.	桑玉还, 严忠婷, 袁媛, 等. 生态瞬时评估在脑卒中患者中应用的范围综述. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(3): 304-310.
18.	董蝶, 沐婷玉, 徐佳怡, 等. 心理障碍人群基于自我同情的网络干预的范围综述. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(15): 99-102.
19.	张兰兰, 孙巧玲, 王小平. 精神分裂症患者言语流畅任务功能近红外光谱研究的概况性评价. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2023, 37(8): 648-654.
20.	王惠, 程康耀, 朱佩敏, 等. 2型糖尿病患者联合运动类型及特征的范围综述. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(10): 1192-1198.
21.	汤诗恒, 林璟珊, 李晶晶, 等. 用户画像在国内外慢性病领域应用的范围综述. 解放军护理杂志, 2021, 38(5): 52-54,58.
22.	张小艳, 李学靖, 周雅静, 等. 实施科学视角下最佳实践证据推广的范围综述. 中国护理管理, 2021, 21(10): 1594-1600.
23.	Dinh TTH, Tori K, Hines S. Interprofessional disaster exercises for undergraduate nursing students: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth, 2023, 21(12): 2281-2308.
24.	Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map. J Contin Educ Health Prof, 2006, 26(1): 13-24.
25.	Baghbanian A, Merlin T, Carter D, et al. Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(11): e039263.
26.	卞薇, 陈慧, 宋国敏, 等. 概况性评价简介. 中国循证医学杂志, 2017, 17(4): 488-493.
27.	Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods, 2014, 5(4): 371-385.
28.	Pollock D, Tricco AC, Peters MDJ, et al. Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth, 2022, 20(4): 1098-1105.
29.	Cahill J, Barkham M, Hardy G, et al. A review and critical appraisal of measures of therapist-patient interactions in mental health settings. Health Technol Assess, 2008, 12(24): iii-47.
30.	Brien SE, Lorenzetti DL, Lewis S, et al. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci, 2010, 5: 2.

1. Wang Y, Zhu S, Liu C, et al. Text mining and hub gene network analysis of endometriosis. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021: 5517145.
2. Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, et al. What kind of systematic review should I conduct. A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2018, 18(1): 5.
3. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review. Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2018, 18(1): 143.
4. Aucoin M, LaChance L, Naidoo U, et al. Diet and anxiety: a scoping review. Nutrients, 2021, 13(12): 4418.
5. Gagliardi AR, Alhabib S. Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review. Implement Sci, 2015, 10: 54.
6. Ost K, Duquesne L, Duguay C, et al. Large-scale infectious disease testing programs have little consideration for equity: findings from a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol, 2022, 143: 30-60.
7. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth, 2020, 18(10): 2119-2126.
8. Koene J, Zyto S, van der Stel J, et al. The relations between executive functions and occupational functioning in individuals with bipolar disorder: a scoping review. Int J Bipolar Disord, 2022, 10(1): 8.
9. Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014, 67(12): 1291-1294.
10. Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2013, 13: 48.
11. Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies. A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud, 2009, 46(10): 1386-1400.
12. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J, 2009, 26(2): 91-108.
13. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci, 2010, 5: 69.
14. 王喜益, 叶志弘, 汤磊雯. 范围综述在护理领域的应用进展. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(8): 1259-1263.
15. Peters MDJ. Chapter 11: scoping reviews. 2017.
16. Peters MDJ. Chapter 11: scoping reviews (2020 version). 2020.
17. 桑玉还, 严忠婷, 袁媛, 等. 生态瞬时评估在脑卒中患者中应用的范围综述. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(3): 304-310.
18. 董蝶, 沐婷玉, 徐佳怡, 等. 心理障碍人群基于自我同情的网络干预的范围综述. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(15): 99-102.
19. 张兰兰, 孙巧玲, 王小平. 精神分裂症患者言语流畅任务功能近红外光谱研究的概况性评价. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2023, 37(8): 648-654.
20. 王惠, 程康耀, 朱佩敏, 等. 2型糖尿病患者联合运动类型及特征的范围综述. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(10): 1192-1198.
21. 汤诗恒, 林璟珊, 李晶晶, 等. 用户画像在国内外慢性病领域应用的范围综述. 解放军护理杂志, 2021, 38(5): 52-54,58.
22. 张小艳, 李学靖, 周雅静, 等. 实施科学视角下最佳实践证据推广的范围综述. 中国护理管理, 2021, 21(10): 1594-1600.
23. Dinh TTH, Tori K, Hines S. Interprofessional disaster exercises for undergraduate nursing students: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth, 2023, 21(12): 2281-2308.
24. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map. J Contin Educ Health Prof, 2006, 26(1): 13-24.
25. Baghbanian A, Merlin T, Carter D, et al. Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(11): e039263.
26. 卞薇, 陈慧, 宋国敏, 等. 概况性评价简介. 中国循证医学杂志, 2017, 17(4): 488-493.
27. Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods, 2014, 5(4): 371-385.
28. Pollock D, Tricco AC, Peters MDJ, et al. Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth, 2022, 20(4): 1098-1105.
29. Cahill J, Barkham M, Hardy G, et al. A review and critical appraisal of measures of therapist-patient interactions in mental health settings. Health Technol Assess, 2008, 12(24): iii-47.
30. Brien SE, Lorenzetti DL, Lewis S, et al. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci, 2010, 5: 2.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Latest ArticlesAn introduction of the JBI scoping review execution process

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Format

Content