Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common ocular complication of diabetes patients. It mainly involve macular which is closely related with visual function, thus DME is one of the major reasons causing visual impairment or blindness for diabetes patients. How to reduce the visual damage of DME is always a big challenge in the ophthalmic practice. In the past three decades, there are tremendous developments in DME treatments, from laser photocoagulation, antiinflammation drugs to antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. However, the mechanism of DME development is not yet completely clear; every existing treatment has its own advantages and weaknesses. Therefore DME treatment still challenges us to explore further to reduce the DME damages.
Objective To compare the clinical results of yellow micro-pulse laser and traditional laser grid (MLG) photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods Seventy-eight patients (106 eyes) with DME diagnosed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into micro-pulse group (39 patients, 51 eyes) and MLG group (39 patients, 55 eyes). The patients of micropulse group underwent 577 nm yellow micro-pulse laser therapy, while the patients of MLG group underwent continuous wavelength laser photocoagulation with a 561 nm yellow green laser. All the patients were examined documenting corrected visual acuity, macular retinal thickness (CMT) and mean sensitivity within macular 10 deg; examination before and after treatment. Six months after treatment was considered as the judgment time for the therapeutic effects. The mean corrected visual acuity, CMT and MS were comparatively analyzed. Results Six months after treatment, the mean corrected visual acuity of micropulse group and MLG group were 0.45plusmn;0.20 and 0.42plusmn;0.20, which increased significantly compared to those before treatment (t=3.404,2.316; P＜0.05). The difference of mean corrected visual acuity between before and after treatment of micro-pulse group and MLG group were 0.08plusmn;0.02 and 0.06plusmn;0.03, the difference was statistically significant between two groups (t=0.532, P＞0.05). The mean CMT of micropulse group and MLG group were (323.94plusmn;68.30) and (355.85plusmn;115.88) mu;m, which decreased significantly compared to those before treatment (t=4.028, 2.039; P＜0.05). The difference of mean CMT between before and after treatment of micro-pulse group and MLG group were (55.12plusmn;13.68) and (22.25plusmn;10.92) mu;m. The difference was not statistically significant between two groups (t=1.891,P＞0.05). The mean MS of micro-pulse group and MLG group were (6.63plusmn;2.65) and (4.53plusmn;1.81) dB. The mean MS of micro-pulse group increased significantly compared to that before treatment(t=3.335,P＜0.05). The mean MS of MLG group decreased significantly compared to that before treatment (t=3.589,P＜0.05). The difference of mean MS between before and after treatment of micro-pulse group and MLG group were (1.10plusmn;0.33) and (-0.91plusmn;0.25) dB.The difference was statistically significant between groups (t=4.872，P＜0.05). Conclusions In the treatment of DME, yellow micro-pulse laser therapy and MLG can improve visual acuity, and reduce CMT. In addition, yellow micro-pulse laser therapy can improve the MS, but MLG reduces MS.
Objective To observe the subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in eyes of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods Twenty patients (32 eyes) with DME were enrolled in this crosssectional observational study. The patients included 12 males and eight females, with a mean age of (47.3plusmn;10.2) years. All the patients were examined documenting best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spectraldomain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ophthalmological examination. According to OCT DME morphology, samples are divided into diffuse macular edema, cystoid macular edema, serous retinal detachment and hard exudate groups. The SFCT was measured by a Cirrus HD-OCT with enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and was compared with the average SFCT (286.84plusmn;28.80) mu;m of same age group. Correlation between SFCT and age, diopter, diabetic duration, fasting blood glucose, BCVA and central retinal thickness were analyzed by Pearson Analysis. SFCT of different DME types were analyzed by ANOVA Analysis. Results The mean SFCT of 32 eyes was (223.81plusmn;43.74) mu;m (ranging from 120.50 to 361.50 mu;m), which was lower by 63.03 mu;m (95% confidence interval, -78.80 to -47.26 mu;m, P＜0.01) from normal SFCT. SFCT was independent of age (r=0.124), diopter (r=0.277), diabetic duration (r=0.286), fasting blood glucose (r=0.408), BCVA (r=0.087), and central retinal thickness (r=0.036). There was no significant difference of SFCT between different DME types (F=0.042，P＞0.05). Conclusion SFCT is thinner in eyes with DME as compared to normal eyes of the same age.
Objective To observe the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) in aqueous humor of patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods Forty eyes of 40 consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO (CRVO group) were enrolled in this study. The patients included 25 males and 15 females. The patient age ranged from 38 to 76 years. The control group was 20 patients with senile cataract who underwent phacoemulsification, including 10 males and 10 females. The levels of VEGF165, VEGF165b, IL-6 and MCP-1 in aqueous humor were determined by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. The correlation of VEGF, and IL-6, and MCP-1 were analyzed. Results The median aqueous level of VEGF165, IL-6 and MCP-1 were 1089.0, 165.6, 1253.0 pg/ml respectively in CRVO group, which were higher than the control group's results (168.2, 4.7, 216.4 pg/ml respectively), the differences were statistically significant (Z=-4.549, -6.008, -5.343;P＜0.001). The VEGF165b in CRVO group and control group were 834.0, 915.9 pg/ml respectively, the difference was not statistically significant (Z=-0.207，P＞0.05). The ratio of VEGF165b to VEGF165 in CRVO group and control group were 2.71, 7.28 respectively, the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.007，P＜0.05). There was a highly positive correlation between IL-6 and VEGF in CRVO group (r=0.526,P=0.001) and also mild positive correlation in control group (r=0.425，P=0.070). No correlation between MCP-1 and VEGF was observed in both groups (CRVO group: r=0.211,P＞0.05. Control group: r=-0.019,P＞0.05). Conclusions VEGF165, IL-6 and MCP-1 levels were increased in CRVO patients while the VEGF165b was normal. The ratio between VEGF165b and VEGF165 in aqueous humor of patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO was decreased.
Objective To observe the choroidal changes of diabetic macular edema (DME) with serous macular detachment (SMD) in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) patients by optical coherence tomography (OCT).Methods Nine NPDR patients including DME with SMD in one eye (SMD group) and only DME in the other eye (DME group) were enrolled. These 18 eyes were also divided into PRP group (six eyes, received panretinal photocoagulation before) and non-PRP group (12 eyes). Spectral domain EDI (enhance depth imaging) OCT and fundus photograph were performed in all the eyes. The subfoveal choroidal thickness was measured. The choroidal simulation area acquired by horizontal EDI-OCT scan through the center of the fovea was calculated by Image Plus Pro 6.0 software. The difference between DME and SMD group was compared and analyzed with matched t- test; the difference between PRP and non-PRP group was compared and analyzed with F test.Results In SMD group, spindle-like or domelike low signal of detachment areas with intact external limiting membrane were found in the retinal detachment region, and the inner and outer segments (IS/OS) were separated from the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) Bruch membrane. Both subfoveal choroidal thickness and choroidal simulation area in SMD group were significant greater than those in DME group (t=2.306, 2.306;P＜0.05). Choroidal simulation area in PRP group was larger than that in nonPRP group (F=5.227,P＜0.05). But there was no significant difference of subfoveal choroidal thickness between PRP and non-PRP group (F=3.276,P＞0.05). Conclusion EDI-OCT detects spindlelike or domelike low signal areas in detachment region of SMD with DME in NPDR patients.