Progress in surgical selection and prognosis evaluation of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment_Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases

Authors：

Luo Jingting ,  Wei Wenbin

Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology&Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China;

Corresponding author：

Wei Wenbin, Email: weiwenbintr@163.com

Keywords：

Retinal detachment; Scleral buckling; Vitrectomy; Review

DOI：

10.3760/cma.j.cn511434-20210207-00072

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), the most common type of retinal detachment, is the separation of neurosensory retina from the underlying retinal pigment epithelium. The key to surgical treatment of RRD is to find and seal all retinal breaks while the major surgical procedures include scleral buckle (SB), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and a combination of the two (PPV/SB). Different surgical methods have their own advantages and limitations. SB plays a very important role in certain types of RRD, providing a high rate of anatomical reduction and a good prognosis of visual function. Combined PPV is also an important auxiliary means for the treatment of complicated RRD. The rapid development of vitreoretinal surgery has greatly contributed to the trend of RRD surgery from extraocular to intraocular. However, it is worth noting that personalized RRD surgical methods are needed to be provided for different patients in order to minimize the occurrence of complications.

Citation： Luo Jingting, Wei Wenbin. Progress in surgical selection and prognosis evaluation of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases, 2022, 38(4): 325-329. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511434-20210207-00072 Copy

1.	Ng TK, Chen W, Chen Q, et al. COL2A1 protective variant reduces sporadic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment severity[J/OL]. Exp Eye Res, 2020, 191: 107907[2019-12-31]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31899252/. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107907.
2.	Liao L, Zhu XH. Advances in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2019, 12(4): 660-667. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.04.22.
3.	Kreissig I. Primary retinal detachment: a review of the development of techniques for repair in the past 80 years[J]. Taiwan J Ophthalmol, 2016, 6(4): 161-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjo.2016.04.006.
4.	Znaor L, Medic A, Binder S, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments[J/OL]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 3(3): CD009562[2019-03-08]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30848830/. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009562.pub2.
5.	李青. 孔源性视网膜脱离的自行复位[J]. 国际眼科纵览, 2007, 31(6): 431.Li Q. Self-reduction of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int Rec Ophthalmol, 2007, 31(6): 431.
6.	Malosse L, Rousseau H, Baumann C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for outer retinal layer damage after macula-off retinal detachment[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2020, 104(5): 660-665. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314236.
7.	Quijano C, Alkabes M, Gómez-Resa M, et al. Scleral buckling in phakic uncomplicated primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: long-term outcomes[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2017, 27(2): 220-225. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000914.
8.	Wang A, Snead MP. Scleral buckling-a brief historical overview and current indications[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 258(3): 467-478. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04562-1.
9.	Meng L, Zhao X, Zhang W, et al. The characteristics of optic disc pit maculopathy and the efficacy of vitrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2021, 99(7): e1176-e1189[2021-01-09]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33421324/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14730.
10.	Mason RH, Minaker SA, Marafon SB, et al. Retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2022, 7: S0039-6257(22)00002-9[2022-01-07]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007619/. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.01.002.
11.	Kusaba K, Tsuboi K, Handa T, et al. Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: evaluation of a minimally restricted face-down positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2021, 14(6): 936-939. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.06.21.
12.	Arias L, Padrón-Pérez N, Flores-Moreno I, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus nonpeeling to prevent epiretinal membrane development in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a swept-source optical coherence tomography study with a new postoperative classification system[J]. Retina, 2020, 40(7): 1286-1298. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002591.
13.	Perente I, Eriş E, Erdoğan G, et al. Secondary epiretinal membrane following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J/OL]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2020, 31: 101833[2020-05-31]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32492519/. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101833.
14.	Abdullah ME, Moharram HEM, Abdelhalim AS, et al. Evaluation of primary internal limiting membrane peeling in cases with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J/OL]. Int J Retina Vitreous, 2020, 6: 8[2020-05-07]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32411388/. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-020-00213-4.
15.	Sousa K, Calvão-Santos G, Costa J, et al. Anatomical and functional results of ILM peeling vs. non-peeling in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 258(10): 2105-2110. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04775-9.
16.	Fallico M, Russo A, Longo A, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2018, 3(7): e0201010[2018-07-19]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30024983/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201010.
17.	Sizmaz S, Esen E, Isik P, et al. Outcome and complications of combined phacoemulsification and 23-Gauge pars plana vitrectomy[J/OL]. J Ophthalmol, 2019, 2019: 7918237[2019-03-17]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31007952/. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7918237.
18.	Benson MD, Sia D, Seamone ME, et al. Phacovitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: a retrospective review[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(4): 753-760. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002945.
19.	Moussa G, Sachdev A, Mohite AA, et al. Assessing refractive outcomes and accuracy of biometry in phacovitrectomy and sequential operations in patients with retinal detachment compared with routine cataract surgery[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(8): 1605-1611. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003092.
20.	Sakamoto M, Yoshida I, Sodeno T, et al. Postoperative refractive prediction error measured by optical and acoustic biometry after phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without macular involvement[J/OL]. J Ophthalmol, 2019, 2019: 5964127[2019-05-02]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31191998/. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5964127.
21.	Loukovaara S, Haukka J. Repair of primary RRD-comparing pars plana vitrectomy procedure with combined phacovitrectomy with standard foldable intraocular lens implantation[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2018, 12: 1449-1457. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S171451.
22.	Tan A, Bertrand-Boiché M, Angioi-Duprez K, et al. Outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a comparative study[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(1): 68-74. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002803.
23.	Kim MS, Woo SJ, Park KH. Phacovitrectomy versus lens-sparing vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair according to the surgical experience[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(8): 1597-1604. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003090.
24.	Fallico M, Alosi P, Reibaldi M, et al. Scleral buckling: a review of clinical aspects and current concepts[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(2): 314. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020314.
25.	Radeck V, Helbig H, Barth T, et al. Ablatiochirurgie: trends über 15 Jahre [Retinal detachment surgery: trends over 15 years][J]. Ophthalmologe, 2022, 119(Suppl 1): S64-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-021-01430-4.
26.	Deaner JD, Aderman CM, Bonafede L, et al. PPV, retinectomy, and silicone oil without scleral buckle for recurrent RRD from proliferative vitreoretinopathy[J/OL]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 2019, 50(11): e278-e287[2019-11-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31755979/. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20191031-15.
27.	Bernabei F, Pellegrini M, Taroni L, et al. Choroidal vascular changes after encircling scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Eye (Lond), 2021, 35(9): 2619-2623. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01307-x.
28.	Angermann R, Huber AL, Hofer M, et al. Efficiency benchmarks in the surgical management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a monocentric register cohort study of operating room time metrics and influential factors[J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(12): e052513[2021-12-21]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34933861/. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052513.
29.	Churashov SV, Shevalova TN, Kulikov AN, et al. Surgical outcomes in inferior recurrences of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2021, 14(12): 1909-1914. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.15.
30.	Yannuzzi NA, Li C, Fujino D, et al. Clinical outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with pneumatic retinopexy[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2021, 139(8): 848-853. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1860.
31.	Dhami A, Shah KK, Ratra D. Pneumatic retinopexy outcomes as primary or secondary surgical option for treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2018, 66(3): 420-425. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_999_17.
32.	陈洁华, 李敏. 孔源性视网膜脱离的手术治疗进展[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2017, 10(4): 383-387. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.04.29.Chen JH, Li M. The progress of research on the surgical treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine, 2017, 10(4): 383-387. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.04.29.
33.	Martínez-Mujica MT, Retamal J, González R. Scleral buckle versus pneumatic retinopexy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments[J/OL]. Medwave, 2018, 18(6): e7278[2018-10-05]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30339142/. DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2018.06.7277.
34.	Demircan A, Alkın Z, Cakir I, et al. Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment after failed pneumatic retinopexy and primary pars plana vitrectomy[J]. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2019, 42(2): 146-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.09.004.
35.	Brosh K, Francisconi CLM, Qian J, et al. Retinal displacement following pneumatic retinopexy vs pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2020, 138(6): 652-659. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1046.
36.	Morescalchi F, Russo A, Gandolfo F, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy preceded by drainage of subretinal fluid for the treatment of severe bullous retinal detachment[J/OL]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2021, 99(1): e109-e116[2020-06-23]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32573121/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14528.
37.	Terasaki H. Multimodal approaches for the analysis of retinal functional disorders―focusing on retinal detachment[J]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, 2017, 121(3): 185-231.
38.	Borowicz D, Nowomiejska K, Nowakowska D, et al. Functional and morphological results of treatment of macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19(1): 118. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1120-3.
39.	蔡瑞珍, 陈慷. 累及黄斑的孔源性视网膜脱离手术前后黄斑区光学相干断层扫描与多焦视网膜电图的变化[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2017, 19(9): 554-559. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2017.09.007.Cai RZ, Chen K. Comparisons of multifocal electroretinograms and optical coherence tomography images before and after surgery in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment involving the macular area[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2017, 19(9): 554-559. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2017.09.007.
40.	Ryan EH, Joseph DP, Ryan CM, et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study: methodology and overall outcomes-primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 1[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2020, 4(8): 814-822. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.02.014.
41.	Ryan EH, Ryan CM, Forbes NJ, et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 2: phakic retinal detachment outcomes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127(8): 1077-1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.007.
42.	Joseph DP, Ryan EH, Ryan CM, et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study: pseudophakic retinal detachment outcomes: primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 3[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127(11): 1507-1514. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.005.
43.	Coppola M, Marchese A, Cicinelli MV, et al. Macular optical coherence tomography findings after vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2020, 30(4): 805-816. DOI: 10.1177/1120672120911334.
44.	Hassanpoor N, Milani AE, Kordestani A, et al. Analysis of retinal layers' thickness and vascular density after successful scleral buckle surgery[J]. J Curr Ophthalmol, 2021, 33(3): 304-309. DOI: 10.4103/2452-2325.329078.
45.	Gharbiya M, Albanese GM, Plateroti AM, et al. Macular ganglion cell layer thickness after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: scleral buckling versus pars plana vitrectomy[J/OL]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(5): 1411[2020-05-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32397630/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051411.
46.	Rabina G, Azem N, Barequet D, et al. Silicone oil tamponade effect on macular layer thickness and visual acuity[J]. Retina, 2020, 40(5): 998-1004. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002464.
47.	Nam SH, Kim K, Kim ES, et al. Longitudinal microvascular changes on optical coherence tomographic angiography after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair surgery[J]. 2021, 244(1): 34-41. DOI: 10.1159/000508464.
48.	Tsen CL, Sheu SJ, Chen SC, et al. Imaging analysis with optical coherence tomography angiography after primary repair of macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2019, 257(9): 1847-1855. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04381-4.
49.	Noda H, Kimura S, Morizane Y, et al. Relationship between preoperative foveal microstructure and visual acuity in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: imaging analysis by swept source optical coherence tomography[J]. Retina, 2020, 40(10): 1873-1880. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002687.
50.	Yeo YD, Kim YC. Significance of outer retinal undulation on preoperative optical coherence tomography in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J/OL]. Sci Rep. 2020, 10(1): 15747[2020-09-25]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32978493/. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72907-6.
51.	Zaletel Benda P, Vratanar B, Petrovski G, et al. Prognostic factor analysis of visual outcome after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J/OL]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(10): 3251[2020-10-12]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33053642/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103251.
52.	Dhoot AS, Popovic MM, Nichani PAH, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 15 947 eyes[J/OL]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2021, 2021: S0039-6257(21)00221-6(2021-02-07)[2021-02-07]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34896191/. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.005. [published online ahead of print].
53.	Dotan A, Johnson D, Kherani A, et al. Success rates for retinal detachment repair in alberta: a physician learning program initiative[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2019, 241(3): 170-172. DOI: 10.1159/000492538.
54.	Martínez-Castillo VJ, García-Arumí J, Boixadera A. Pars plana vitrectomy alone for the management of pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with only inferior breaks[J]. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(7): 1563-1569. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.032.
55.	Kosacki J, Gallice M, Palombi K, et al. Multifocal electroretinography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective cohort study[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(4): 744-752. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002939.
56.	Noda H, Kimura S, Hosokawa MM, et al. Effect of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment on preoperative and postoperative retinal sensitivities[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 21497[2020-12-09]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33299123/. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78693-5.
57.	Conart JB, Blot G, Augustin S, et al. Insulin inhibits inflammation-induced cone death in retinal detachment[J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2020, 17(1): 358. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-020-02039-1.
58.	Khurana RN, Patel VR. Paracentral and cecocentral scotomas after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2020, 219: 163-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.026.
59.	Singh S, Khatri A, Byanju R, et al. Reviving the lost art of scleral buckling surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: evaluation of risk factors of detachments, poor physiological outcomes, and perspective from a developing country[J/OL]. Ther Adv Ophthalmol, 2019, 11: 2515841419838662[2019-04-07]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31001604/. DOI: 10.1177/2515841419838662.
60.	Kunikata H, Abe T, Nakazawa T. Historical, current and future approaches to surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2019, 248(3): 159-168. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.248.159.
61.	Vail D, Pershing S, Reeves MG, et al. The relative impact of patient, physician, and geographic factors on variation in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment management[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127(1): 97-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.019.
62.	Eibenberger K, Georgopoulos M, Rezar-Dreindl S, et al. Development of surgical management in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treatment from 2009 to 2015[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2018, 43(4): 517-525. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1428996.
63.	Reeves MG, Pershing S, Afshar AR. Choice of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair method in us commercially insured and medicare advantage patients, 2003-2016[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2018, 196: 82-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.024.
64.	Shu I, Ishikawa H, Nishikawa H, et al. Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for young japanese patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the era of microincision surgery: real-world evidence from a multicentre study in Japan[J/OL]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2019, 97(5): e736-e741[2019-02-11]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30741467/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14050.
65.	Park SJ, Cho SC, Choi NK, et al. Age, sex, and time-specific trends in surgical approaches for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a nationwide, population-based study using the national claim registry[J]. Retina, 2017, 37(12): 2326-2333. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001485.
66.	朱磊, 李琳, 田晓燕, 等. 巩膜扣带术后影响视网膜复位和视力恢复的相关因素分析[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(2): 167-171. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0044.Zhu L, Li L, Tian XY, et al. Correlative factors analysis of affecting anatomical reattachment and vision restoration after scleral buckling surgery[J]. Rec Adv Opthalmol, 2017, 37(2): 167-171. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0044.
67.	Hashimoto Y, Michihata N, Matsui H, et al. Recent trends in vitreoretinal surgery: a nationwide database study in Japan, 2010-2017[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2021, 65(1): 54-62. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-020-00777-6.
68.	Fischer CV, Kulanga M, Hoerauf H. Trends in der ablatiochirurgie: was hat sich im vergleich zu 2001 geändert? [Trends in retinal detachment surgery: what has changed compared to 2001?][J]. Ophthalmologe, 2018, 115(8): 663-668. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0559-y.

1. Ng TK, Chen W, Chen Q, et al. COL2A1 protective variant reduces sporadic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment severity[J/OL]. Exp Eye Res, 2020, 191: 107907[2019-12-31]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31899252/. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107907.
2. Liao L, Zhu XH. Advances in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2019, 12(4): 660-667. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.04.22.
3. Kreissig I. Primary retinal detachment: a review of the development of techniques for repair in the past 80 years[J]. Taiwan J Ophthalmol, 2016, 6(4): 161-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjo.2016.04.006.
4. Znaor L, Medic A, Binder S, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments[J/OL]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 3(3): CD009562[2019-03-08]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30848830/. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009562.pub2.
5. 李青. 孔源性视网膜脱离的自行复位[J]. 国际眼科纵览, 2007, 31(6): 431.Li Q. Self-reduction of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int Rec Ophthalmol, 2007, 31(6): 431.
6. Malosse L, Rousseau H, Baumann C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for outer retinal layer damage after macula-off retinal detachment[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2020, 104(5): 660-665. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314236.
7. Quijano C, Alkabes M, Gómez-Resa M, et al. Scleral buckling in phakic uncomplicated primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: long-term outcomes[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2017, 27(2): 220-225. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000914.
8. Wang A, Snead MP. Scleral buckling-a brief historical overview and current indications[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 258(3): 467-478. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04562-1.
9. Meng L, Zhao X, Zhang W, et al. The characteristics of optic disc pit maculopathy and the efficacy of vitrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2021, 99(7): e1176-e1189[2021-01-09]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33421324/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14730.
10. Mason RH, Minaker SA, Marafon SB, et al. Retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2022, 7: S0039-6257(22)00002-9[2022-01-07]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007619/. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.01.002.
11. Kusaba K, Tsuboi K, Handa T, et al. Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: evaluation of a minimally restricted face-down positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2021, 14(6): 936-939. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.06.21.
12. Arias L, Padrón-Pérez N, Flores-Moreno I, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus nonpeeling to prevent epiretinal membrane development in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a swept-source optical coherence tomography study with a new postoperative classification system[J]. Retina, 2020, 40(7): 1286-1298. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002591.
13. Perente I, Eriş E, Erdoğan G, et al. Secondary epiretinal membrane following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J/OL]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2020, 31: 101833[2020-05-31]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32492519/. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101833.
14. Abdullah ME, Moharram HEM, Abdelhalim AS, et al. Evaluation of primary internal limiting membrane peeling in cases with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J/OL]. Int J Retina Vitreous, 2020, 6: 8[2020-05-07]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32411388/. DOI: 10.1186/s40942-020-00213-4.
15. Sousa K, Calvão-Santos G, Costa J, et al. Anatomical and functional results of ILM peeling vs. non-peeling in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 258(10): 2105-2110. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04775-9.
16. Fallico M, Russo A, Longo A, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2018, 3(7): e0201010[2018-07-19]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30024983/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201010.
17. Sizmaz S, Esen E, Isik P, et al. Outcome and complications of combined phacoemulsification and 23-Gauge pars plana vitrectomy[J/OL]. J Ophthalmol, 2019, 2019: 7918237[2019-03-17]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31007952/. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7918237.
18. Benson MD, Sia D, Seamone ME, et al. Phacovitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: a retrospective review[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(4): 753-760. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002945.
19. Moussa G, Sachdev A, Mohite AA, et al. Assessing refractive outcomes and accuracy of biometry in phacovitrectomy and sequential operations in patients with retinal detachment compared with routine cataract surgery[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(8): 1605-1611. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003092.
20. Sakamoto M, Yoshida I, Sodeno T, et al. Postoperative refractive prediction error measured by optical and acoustic biometry after phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without macular involvement[J/OL]. J Ophthalmol, 2019, 2019: 5964127[2019-05-02]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31191998/. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5964127.
21. Loukovaara S, Haukka J. Repair of primary RRD-comparing pars plana vitrectomy procedure with combined phacovitrectomy with standard foldable intraocular lens implantation[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2018, 12: 1449-1457. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S171451.
22. Tan A, Bertrand-Boiché M, Angioi-Duprez K, et al. Outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a comparative study[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(1): 68-74. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002803.
23. Kim MS, Woo SJ, Park KH. Phacovitrectomy versus lens-sparing vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair according to the surgical experience[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(8): 1597-1604. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003090.
24. Fallico M, Alosi P, Reibaldi M, et al. Scleral buckling: a review of clinical aspects and current concepts[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(2): 314. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020314.
25. Radeck V, Helbig H, Barth T, et al. Ablatiochirurgie: trends über 15 Jahre [Retinal detachment surgery: trends over 15 years][J]. Ophthalmologe, 2022, 119(Suppl 1): S64-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-021-01430-4.
26. Deaner JD, Aderman CM, Bonafede L, et al. PPV, retinectomy, and silicone oil without scleral buckle for recurrent RRD from proliferative vitreoretinopathy[J/OL]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 2019, 50(11): e278-e287[2019-11-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31755979/. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20191031-15.
27. Bernabei F, Pellegrini M, Taroni L, et al. Choroidal vascular changes after encircling scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Eye (Lond), 2021, 35(9): 2619-2623. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01307-x.
28. Angermann R, Huber AL, Hofer M, et al. Efficiency benchmarks in the surgical management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a monocentric register cohort study of operating room time metrics and influential factors[J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(12): e052513[2021-12-21]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34933861/. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052513.
29. Churashov SV, Shevalova TN, Kulikov AN, et al. Surgical outcomes in inferior recurrences of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2021, 14(12): 1909-1914. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.15.
30. Yannuzzi NA, Li C, Fujino D, et al. Clinical outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with pneumatic retinopexy[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2021, 139(8): 848-853. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1860.
31. Dhami A, Shah KK, Ratra D. Pneumatic retinopexy outcomes as primary or secondary surgical option for treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2018, 66(3): 420-425. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_999_17.
32. 陈洁华, 李敏. 孔源性视网膜脱离的手术治疗进展[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2017, 10(4): 383-387. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.04.29.Chen JH, Li M. The progress of research on the surgical treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine, 2017, 10(4): 383-387. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.04.29.
33. Martínez-Mujica MT, Retamal J, González R. Scleral buckle versus pneumatic retinopexy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments[J/OL]. Medwave, 2018, 18(6): e7278[2018-10-05]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30339142/. DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2018.06.7277.
34. Demircan A, Alkın Z, Cakir I, et al. Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment after failed pneumatic retinopexy and primary pars plana vitrectomy[J]. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2019, 42(2): 146-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.09.004.
35. Brosh K, Francisconi CLM, Qian J, et al. Retinal displacement following pneumatic retinopexy vs pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2020, 138(6): 652-659. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1046.
36. Morescalchi F, Russo A, Gandolfo F, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy preceded by drainage of subretinal fluid for the treatment of severe bullous retinal detachment[J/OL]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2021, 99(1): e109-e116[2020-06-23]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32573121/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14528.
37. Terasaki H. Multimodal approaches for the analysis of retinal functional disorders―focusing on retinal detachment[J]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, 2017, 121(3): 185-231.
38. Borowicz D, Nowomiejska K, Nowakowska D, et al. Functional and morphological results of treatment of macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19(1): 118. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1120-3.
39. 蔡瑞珍, 陈慷. 累及黄斑的孔源性视网膜脱离手术前后黄斑区光学相干断层扫描与多焦视网膜电图的变化[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2017, 19(9): 554-559. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2017.09.007.Cai RZ, Chen K. Comparisons of multifocal electroretinograms and optical coherence tomography images before and after surgery in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment involving the macular area[J]. Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2017, 19(9): 554-559. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2017.09.007.
40. Ryan EH, Joseph DP, Ryan CM, et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study: methodology and overall outcomes-primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 1[J]. Ophthalmol Retina, 2020, 4(8): 814-822. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.02.014.
41. Ryan EH, Ryan CM, Forbes NJ, et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 2: phakic retinal detachment outcomes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127(8): 1077-1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.007.
42. Joseph DP, Ryan EH, Ryan CM, et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study: pseudophakic retinal detachment outcomes: primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 3[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127(11): 1507-1514. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.005.
43. Coppola M, Marchese A, Cicinelli MV, et al. Macular optical coherence tomography findings after vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2020, 30(4): 805-816. DOI: 10.1177/1120672120911334.
44. Hassanpoor N, Milani AE, Kordestani A, et al. Analysis of retinal layers' thickness and vascular density after successful scleral buckle surgery[J]. J Curr Ophthalmol, 2021, 33(3): 304-309. DOI: 10.4103/2452-2325.329078.
45. Gharbiya M, Albanese GM, Plateroti AM, et al. Macular ganglion cell layer thickness after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: scleral buckling versus pars plana vitrectomy[J/OL]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(5): 1411[2020-05-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32397630/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051411.
46. Rabina G, Azem N, Barequet D, et al. Silicone oil tamponade effect on macular layer thickness and visual acuity[J]. Retina, 2020, 40(5): 998-1004. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002464.
47. Nam SH, Kim K, Kim ES, et al. Longitudinal microvascular changes on optical coherence tomographic angiography after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair surgery[J]. 2021, 244(1): 34-41. DOI: 10.1159/000508464.
48. Tsen CL, Sheu SJ, Chen SC, et al. Imaging analysis with optical coherence tomography angiography after primary repair of macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2019, 257(9): 1847-1855. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04381-4.
49. Noda H, Kimura S, Morizane Y, et al. Relationship between preoperative foveal microstructure and visual acuity in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: imaging analysis by swept source optical coherence tomography[J]. Retina, 2020, 40(10): 1873-1880. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002687.
50. Yeo YD, Kim YC. Significance of outer retinal undulation on preoperative optical coherence tomography in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J/OL]. Sci Rep. 2020, 10(1): 15747[2020-09-25]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32978493/. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72907-6.
51. Zaletel Benda P, Vratanar B, Petrovski G, et al. Prognostic factor analysis of visual outcome after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J/OL]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(10): 3251[2020-10-12]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33053642/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103251.
52. Dhoot AS, Popovic MM, Nichani PAH, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 15 947 eyes[J/OL]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2021, 2021: S0039-6257(21)00221-6(2021-02-07)[2021-02-07]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34896191/. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.005. [published online ahead of print].
53. Dotan A, Johnson D, Kherani A, et al. Success rates for retinal detachment repair in alberta: a physician learning program initiative[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2019, 241(3): 170-172. DOI: 10.1159/000492538.
54. Martínez-Castillo VJ, García-Arumí J, Boixadera A. Pars plana vitrectomy alone for the management of pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with only inferior breaks[J]. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(7): 1563-1569. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.032.
55. Kosacki J, Gallice M, Palombi K, et al. Multifocal electroretinography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective cohort study[J]. Retina, 2021, 41(4): 744-752. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002939.
56. Noda H, Kimura S, Hosokawa MM, et al. Effect of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment on preoperative and postoperative retinal sensitivities[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 21497[2020-12-09]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33299123/. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78693-5.
57. Conart JB, Blot G, Augustin S, et al. Insulin inhibits inflammation-induced cone death in retinal detachment[J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2020, 17(1): 358. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-020-02039-1.
58. Khurana RN, Patel VR. Paracentral and cecocentral scotomas after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2020, 219: 163-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.026.
59. Singh S, Khatri A, Byanju R, et al. Reviving the lost art of scleral buckling surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: evaluation of risk factors of detachments, poor physiological outcomes, and perspective from a developing country[J/OL]. Ther Adv Ophthalmol, 2019, 11: 2515841419838662[2019-04-07]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31001604/. DOI: 10.1177/2515841419838662.
60. Kunikata H, Abe T, Nakazawa T. Historical, current and future approaches to surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2019, 248(3): 159-168. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.248.159.
61. Vail D, Pershing S, Reeves MG, et al. The relative impact of patient, physician, and geographic factors on variation in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment management[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127(1): 97-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.019.
62. Eibenberger K, Georgopoulos M, Rezar-Dreindl S, et al. Development of surgical management in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treatment from 2009 to 2015[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2018, 43(4): 517-525. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1428996.
63. Reeves MG, Pershing S, Afshar AR. Choice of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair method in us commercially insured and medicare advantage patients, 2003-2016[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2018, 196: 82-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.024.
64. Shu I, Ishikawa H, Nishikawa H, et al. Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for young japanese patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the era of microincision surgery: real-world evidence from a multicentre study in Japan[J/OL]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2019, 97(5): e736-e741[2019-02-11]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30741467/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14050.
65. Park SJ, Cho SC, Choi NK, et al. Age, sex, and time-specific trends in surgical approaches for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a nationwide, population-based study using the national claim registry[J]. Retina, 2017, 37(12): 2326-2333. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001485.
66. 朱磊, 李琳, 田晓燕, 等. 巩膜扣带术后影响视网膜复位和视力恢复的相关因素分析[J]. 眼科新进展, 2017, 37(2): 167-171. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0044.Zhu L, Li L, Tian XY, et al. Correlative factors analysis of affecting anatomical reattachment and vision restoration after scleral buckling surgery[J]. Rec Adv Opthalmol, 2017, 37(2): 167-171. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2017.0044.
67. Hashimoto Y, Michihata N, Matsui H, et al. Recent trends in vitreoretinal surgery: a nationwide database study in Japan, 2010-2017[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2021, 65(1): 54-62. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-020-00777-6.
68. Fischer CV, Kulanga M, Hoerauf H. Trends in der ablatiochirurgie: was hat sich im vergleich zu 2001 geändert? [Trends in retinal detachment surgery: what has changed compared to 2001?][J]. Ophthalmologe, 2018, 115(8): 663-668. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0559-y.

Previous Article
结节性硬化病并发双眼视网膜星形细胞错构瘤
Next Article
Research progress of β-adrenergic receptor antagonists in the treatment of ocular neovascular diseases

Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases

Progress in surgical selection and prognosis evaluation of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content