特发性黄斑裂孔手术后黄斑形态功能评估研究现状与进展_Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases

Authors：

李映昱 ,  冯学峰

100191 北京大学第三医院眼科中心;

Corresponding author：

冯学峰, Email: xue168feng@sina.com

Keywords：

视网膜穿孔/外科学; 玻璃体视网膜手; 综述

DOI：

10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2015.04.028

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

随着黄斑区形态、功能检查手段不断丰富,特发性黄斑裂孔(IMH)手术后效果评估也愈加全面。光相干断层扫描用于IMH手术后视网膜分层结构细微变化观察、黄斑中心凹位置以及视网膜体积测量,发现外界膜、光感受器内外节连接、锥体外节尖端等外层视网膜结构的连续性以及黄斑中心凹位置和视网膜体积变化与手术后视力及视敏度改善有一定相关性。眼底自身荧光(FAF)强弱除了可直观反映裂孔闭合状态外,也与视功能密切相关。FAF呈强荧光患眼较正常荧光或弱荧光患眼手术后视力、外层视网膜连续性均差。自适应光学激光扫描检眼镜能够分辨个体视锥细胞异常,由此得到的中心凹中央处暗区像素与总体像素比值这一锥细胞丢失指数可以作为衡量锥细胞丢失水平的客观标准。锥细胞丢失指数越高,手术后视力、视敏度越差。深入了解IMH玻璃体切割手术后黄斑形态、功能改变及其之间的关系,有助于提高对IMH愈合状态的认识,促进IMH玻璃体切割手术治疗技术进步。

Citation： 李映昱, 冯学峰. 特发性黄斑裂孔手术后黄斑形态功能评估研究现状与进展. Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases, 2015, 31(4): 408-412. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2015.04.028 Copy

1.	惠延年. 黄斑裂孔:特发性或是原发性疾病[J]. 眼科,2013,22(4):217-219.
2.	Steel DH, Lotery AJ. Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. Eye (Lond), 2013,27 Suppl 1:S1-21.
3.	Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S,et al. The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013,120(12):2611-2619.
4.	Spiteri Cornish K, Lois N, Scott NW, et al. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014,121(3):649-655.
5.	Usui H, Yasukawa T, Hirano Y, et al. Comparative study of the effects of room air and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade on functional and morphological recovery after macular hole surgery: a retrospective study[J]. Ophthalmic Res, 2013,50(4): 227-230.
6.	Williamson TH, Lee E. Idiopathic macular hole: analysis of visual outcomes and the use of indocyanine green or brilliant blue for internal limiting membrane peel[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2014,252(3):395-400.
7.	Iezzi R, Kapoor KG. No face-down positioning and broad internal limiting membrane peeling in the surgical repair of idiopathic macular holes[J]. Ophthalmology,2013, 120(10):1998-2003.
8.	Haritoglou C, Reiniger IW, Schaumberger M, et al. Five-year follow-up of macular hole surgery with peeling of the internal limiting membrane: update of a prospective study[J]. Retina, 2006,26(6):618-622.
9.	Tranos PG, Ghazi-Nouri SMS, Rubin GS, et al. Visual function and subjective perception of visual ability after macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004, 138(6):995-1002.
10.	Richter-Mueksch S, Sacu S, Osarovsky-Sasin E, et al. Visual performance 3 years after successful macular hole surgery[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2009,93(5):660-663.
11.	von Rückmann A, Fitzke FW, Gregor ZJ. Fundus autofluorescence in patients with macular holes imaged with a laser scanning ophthalmoscope[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1998, 82(4):346-351.
12.	Bottoni F, Carmassi L, Cigada M, et al. Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes: is optical coherence tomography the "gold standard"?[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2008, 92(5):635-639.
13.	Milani P, Seidenari P, Carmassi P, et al. Spontaneous resolution of a full thickness idiopathic macular hole: fundus autofluorescence and OCT imaging[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2007,245(8):1229-1231.
14.	Wakely L, Rahman R, Stephenson J. A comparison of several methods of macular hole measurement using optical coherence tomography, and their value in predicting anatomical and visual outcomes[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2012,96(7):1003-1007.
15.	Passemard M, Yakoubi Y, Muselier A, et al. Long-term outcome of idiopathic macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2010,149(1):120-126.
16.	Krishnan R, Tossounis C, Yang YF. 20-gauge and 23-gauge phacovitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes: comparison of complications and long-term outcomes[J]. Eye(Lond), 2013,27(1):72-77.
17.	Lee YS, Yu SY, Cho NS, et al. Association between fundus autofluorescence and visual outcome in surgically closed macular holes[J]. Retina, 2013,33(6):1144-1150.
18.	Chung H, Shin CJ, Kim JG, et al. Correlation of microperimetry with fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in repaired macular holes[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2011,151(1):128-136.
19.	Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Cisiecki S, et al. Correlation between foveal structure and visual outcome following macular hole surgery: a spectral optical coherence study[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2008,246(6):823-830.
20.	Kawano K, Ito Y, Kondo M, et al. Displacement of foveal area toward optic disc after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling[J]. Eye (Lond), 2013,27(7):871-877.
21.	Kusuhara S, Teraoka Escano MF, Fujii S, et al. Prediction of postoperative visual outcome based on hole configuration by optical coherence in eyes with idiopathic macular holes[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004,138(5):709-716.
22.	Haritoglou C, Neubauer AS, Reiniger IW, et al. Long-term functional outcome of macular hole surgery correlated to optical coherence tomography measurements[J]. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 2007,35(3):208-213.
23.	Pilli S, Zawadzki RJ, Werner JS, et al. Visual outcome correlates with inner macular volume in eyes with surgically closed macular hole[J]. Retina, 2012,32(10): 2085-2095.
24.	Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Nawrocki J. Continuous changes in macular morphology after macular hole closure visualized with spectral optical coherence tomography[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2010,248(9):1249-1255.
25.	Staurenghi G, Sadda S, Chakravarthy U, et al. Proposed lexicon for anatomic landmarks in normal posterior segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the IN-OCT consensus[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014,121(8):1572-1578.
26.	惠延年. 光相干断层扫描眼底影像描述相关的解剖学术语中文译名建议[J]. 中华眼底病杂志,2015,31(1): 86-87.
27.	Nukada K, Hangai M, Ooto S, et al. Tomographic features of macula after successful macular hole surgery[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013,54(4):2417-2428.
28.	Kim KY, Yu SY, Kim M, et al. Morphological change of inner retinal layer on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography following macular hole surgery[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2013,230(1):18-26.
29.	Nicole B,Mariachiara M, Veronese C, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness modification after internal limiting membrane peeling[J]. Retina, 2014,34(4):655-663.
30.	Baba T, Sato E, Oshitari T, et al. Regional reduction of ganglion cell complex after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole[J/OL]. J Ophthalmol,2014,2014:372589[2014-11-16]. http://www.hindawi.com /journals/joph/2014/372589/.
31.	Ooka E, Mitamura Y, Baba T, et al. Foveal microstructure on spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images and visual function after macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2011,152(2):283-290.
32.	Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, et al. Restoration of the photoreceptor outer segment and visual outcomes after macular hole closure: spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2011,249(10): 1469-1476.
33.	Kim NM, Park HJ, Koo GH, et al. Photoreceptor layer assessed in tissue layer image using spectral-domain optical coherence tography after surgical closure of macular hole[J].Retina,2011,31(8):1483-1492.
34.	Sano M, Shimoda Y, Hashimoto H, et al. Restored photoreceptor outer segment and visual recovery after macular hole closure[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009,147(2):313-318.
35.	Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T , et al. Significant correlation between visual acuity and recovery of foveal cone microstructures after macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2012,153(1):111-119.
36.	Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, et al. Correlation between length of foveal cone outer segment tips line defect and visual acuity after macular hole closure[J]. Ophthalmology,2012,119(7):1438-1446.
37.	Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, et al. Asymmetrical recovery of cone outer segment tips line and foveal displacement after successful macular hole surgery[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(5):3003-3011.
38.	Ooto S, Hangai M, Takayama K, et al. Photoreceptor damage and foveal sensitivity in surgically closed macular holes: an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy study[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2012,154(1):174-186.
39.	Yokota S, Ooto S, Hangai M, et al. Objective assessment of foveal cone loss ratio in surgically closed macular holes using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2013,8(5):63786[2013-05-24]. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/236959569_Objective_Assessment_of_Foveal_Cone_Loss_Ratio_in_Surgically_Closed_Macular_Holes_Using_Adaptive_Optics_Scanning_Laser_Ophthalmoscopy.
40.	Hansen S, Batson S, Weinlander KM, et al. Assessing photoreceptor structure after macular hole closure[J]. Retin Cases Brief Rep, 2015,9(1):15-20.
41.	Krøyer K, Christensen U, Larsen M, et al. Quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with macular hole[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008,49(9):3741-3746.
42.	Krøyer K, Christensen U, la Cour M, et al. Metamorphopsia assessment before and after vitrectomy for macular hole[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009,50(12): 5511-5515.
43.	Amari F, Ohta K, Kojima H, et al. Predicting visual outcome after macular hole surgery using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2001,85(1):96-98.
44.	Richter-Mueksch S, Vecsei-Marlovits PV, Sacu SG, et al. Functional macular mapping in patients with vitreomacular pathologic features before and after surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2007,144(1):23-31.
45.	Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, et al. Clinical evaluation of multifocal electroretinogram[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1995,36(10):2146-2150.
46.	Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sparrow JM, et al. United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 2, macular hole[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013,120(3):629-634.
47.	Kumar A, Gogia V, Kumar P,et al. Evaluation of predictors for anatomical success in macular hole surgery in Indian population[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2014,62(12): 1141-1145.
48.	Bonnabel A, Bron AM, Isaico R, et al. Long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of idiopathic macular hole surgery:the yield of spectral-domain OCT combined with microperimetry[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2013,251(11): 2505-2511.
49.	Salter AB, Folgar FA, Weissbrot J, et al. Macular hole surgery prognostic success rates based on macular hole size[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging, 2012,43(3):184-189.
50.	Scupola A, Mastrocola A, Sasso P, et al. Assessment of retinal function before and after idiopathic macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2013,156(1):132-139.
51.	Hikichi T, Onodera A, Ishiko S, et al. Stereo acuity in patients with unilateral macular hole and after unilateral macular hole surgery[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2001,239(2):128-132.
52.	Mireskandari K, Garnham L, Sheard R, et al. A prospective study of the effect of a unilateral macular hole on sensory and motor binocular function and recovery following successful surgery[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2004,88(10):1320-1324.
53.	Sun Z, Gan D, Jiang C, et al. Effect of preoperative retinal sensitivity and fixation on long-term prognosis for idiopathic macular holes[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2012,250(11):1587-1596.
54.	Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Mandelcorn MS, et al. Fixation stability, fixation location, and visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009,50(1):84-89.
55.	陈晶华,黎晓新,徐秀兰. 黄斑裂孔手术前后固视、微视野和mERG的检测[J]. 眼科研究,2002,20(4):328-331.
56.	Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Nomura R, et al. Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001, 42(1):229-234.

1. 惠延年. 黄斑裂孔:特发性或是原发性疾病[J]. 眼科,2013,22(4):217-219.
2. Steel DH, Lotery AJ. Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. Eye (Lond), 2013,27 Suppl 1:S1-21.
3. Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S,et al. The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013,120(12):2611-2619.
4. Spiteri Cornish K, Lois N, Scott NW, et al. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014,121(3):649-655.
5. Usui H, Yasukawa T, Hirano Y, et al. Comparative study of the effects of room air and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade on functional and morphological recovery after macular hole surgery: a retrospective study[J]. Ophthalmic Res, 2013,50(4): 227-230.
6. Williamson TH, Lee E. Idiopathic macular hole: analysis of visual outcomes and the use of indocyanine green or brilliant blue for internal limiting membrane peel[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2014,252(3):395-400.
7. Iezzi R, Kapoor KG. No face-down positioning and broad internal limiting membrane peeling in the surgical repair of idiopathic macular holes[J]. Ophthalmology,2013, 120(10):1998-2003.
8. Haritoglou C, Reiniger IW, Schaumberger M, et al. Five-year follow-up of macular hole surgery with peeling of the internal limiting membrane: update of a prospective study[J]. Retina, 2006,26(6):618-622.
9. Tranos PG, Ghazi-Nouri SMS, Rubin GS, et al. Visual function and subjective perception of visual ability after macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004, 138(6):995-1002.
10. Richter-Mueksch S, Sacu S, Osarovsky-Sasin E, et al. Visual performance 3 years after successful macular hole surgery[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2009,93(5):660-663.
11. von Rückmann A, Fitzke FW, Gregor ZJ. Fundus autofluorescence in patients with macular holes imaged with a laser scanning ophthalmoscope[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 1998, 82(4):346-351.
12. Bottoni F, Carmassi L, Cigada M, et al. Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes: is optical coherence tomography the "gold standard"?[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2008, 92(5):635-639.
13. Milani P, Seidenari P, Carmassi P, et al. Spontaneous resolution of a full thickness idiopathic macular hole: fundus autofluorescence and OCT imaging[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2007,245(8):1229-1231.
14. Wakely L, Rahman R, Stephenson J. A comparison of several methods of macular hole measurement using optical coherence tomography, and their value in predicting anatomical and visual outcomes[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2012,96(7):1003-1007.
15. Passemard M, Yakoubi Y, Muselier A, et al. Long-term outcome of idiopathic macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2010,149(1):120-126.
16. Krishnan R, Tossounis C, Yang YF. 20-gauge and 23-gauge phacovitrectomy for idiopathic macular holes: comparison of complications and long-term outcomes[J]. Eye(Lond), 2013,27(1):72-77.
17. Lee YS, Yu SY, Cho NS, et al. Association between fundus autofluorescence and visual outcome in surgically closed macular holes[J]. Retina, 2013,33(6):1144-1150.
18. Chung H, Shin CJ, Kim JG, et al. Correlation of microperimetry with fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in repaired macular holes[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2011,151(1):128-136.
19. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Cisiecki S, et al. Correlation between foveal structure and visual outcome following macular hole surgery: a spectral optical coherence study[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2008,246(6):823-830.
20. Kawano K, Ito Y, Kondo M, et al. Displacement of foveal area toward optic disc after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling[J]. Eye (Lond), 2013,27(7):871-877.
21. Kusuhara S, Teraoka Escano MF, Fujii S, et al. Prediction of postoperative visual outcome based on hole configuration by optical coherence in eyes with idiopathic macular holes[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2004,138(5):709-716.
22. Haritoglou C, Neubauer AS, Reiniger IW, et al. Long-term functional outcome of macular hole surgery correlated to optical coherence tomography measurements[J]. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 2007,35(3):208-213.
23. Pilli S, Zawadzki RJ, Werner JS, et al. Visual outcome correlates with inner macular volume in eyes with surgically closed macular hole[J]. Retina, 2012,32(10): 2085-2095.
24. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Nawrocki J. Continuous changes in macular morphology after macular hole closure visualized with spectral optical coherence tomography[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2010,248(9):1249-1255.
25. Staurenghi G, Sadda S, Chakravarthy U, et al. Proposed lexicon for anatomic landmarks in normal posterior segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the IN-OCT consensus[J]. Ophthalmology, 2014,121(8):1572-1578.
26. 惠延年. 光相干断层扫描眼底影像描述相关的解剖学术语中文译名建议[J]. 中华眼底病杂志,2015,31(1): 86-87.
27. Nukada K, Hangai M, Ooto S, et al. Tomographic features of macula after successful macular hole surgery[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2013,54(4):2417-2428.
28. Kim KY, Yu SY, Kim M, et al. Morphological change of inner retinal layer on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography following macular hole surgery[J]. Ophthalmologica, 2013,230(1):18-26.
29. Nicole B,Mariachiara M, Veronese C, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness modification after internal limiting membrane peeling[J]. Retina, 2014,34(4):655-663.
30. Baba T, Sato E, Oshitari T, et al. Regional reduction of ganglion cell complex after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole[J/OL]. J Ophthalmol,2014,2014:372589[2014-11-16]. http://www.hindawi.com /journals/joph/2014/372589/.
31. Ooka E, Mitamura Y, Baba T, et al. Foveal microstructure on spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images and visual function after macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2011,152(2):283-290.
32. Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, et al. Restoration of the photoreceptor outer segment and visual outcomes after macular hole closure: spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2011,249(10): 1469-1476.
33. Kim NM, Park HJ, Koo GH, et al. Photoreceptor layer assessed in tissue layer image using spectral-domain optical coherence tography after surgical closure of macular hole[J].Retina,2011,31(8):1483-1492.
34. Sano M, Shimoda Y, Hashimoto H, et al. Restored photoreceptor outer segment and visual recovery after macular hole closure[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2009,147(2):313-318.
35. Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T , et al. Significant correlation between visual acuity and recovery of foveal cone microstructures after macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2012,153(1):111-119.
36. Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, et al. Correlation between length of foveal cone outer segment tips line defect and visual acuity after macular hole closure[J]. Ophthalmology,2012,119(7):1438-1446.
37. Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, et al. Asymmetrical recovery of cone outer segment tips line and foveal displacement after successful macular hole surgery[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014, 55(5):3003-3011.
38. Ooto S, Hangai M, Takayama K, et al. Photoreceptor damage and foveal sensitivity in surgically closed macular holes: an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy study[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2012,154(1):174-186.
39. Yokota S, Ooto S, Hangai M, et al. Objective assessment of foveal cone loss ratio in surgically closed macular holes using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2013,8(5):63786[2013-05-24]. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/236959569_Objective_Assessment_of_Foveal_Cone_Loss_Ratio_in_Surgically_Closed_Macular_Holes_Using_Adaptive_Optics_Scanning_Laser_Ophthalmoscopy.
40. Hansen S, Batson S, Weinlander KM, et al. Assessing photoreceptor structure after macular hole closure[J]. Retin Cases Brief Rep, 2015,9(1):15-20.
41. Krøyer K, Christensen U, Larsen M, et al. Quantification of metamorphopsia in patients with macular hole[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008,49(9):3741-3746.
42. Krøyer K, Christensen U, la Cour M, et al. Metamorphopsia assessment before and after vitrectomy for macular hole[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009,50(12): 5511-5515.
43. Amari F, Ohta K, Kojima H, et al. Predicting visual outcome after macular hole surgery using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2001,85(1):96-98.
44. Richter-Mueksch S, Vecsei-Marlovits PV, Sacu SG, et al. Functional macular mapping in patients with vitreomacular pathologic features before and after surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2007,144(1):23-31.
45. Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, et al. Clinical evaluation of multifocal electroretinogram[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1995,36(10):2146-2150.
46. Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sparrow JM, et al. United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 2, macular hole[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013,120(3):629-634.
47. Kumar A, Gogia V, Kumar P,et al. Evaluation of predictors for anatomical success in macular hole surgery in Indian population[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2014,62(12): 1141-1145.
48. Bonnabel A, Bron AM, Isaico R, et al. Long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of idiopathic macular hole surgery:the yield of spectral-domain OCT combined with microperimetry[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2013,251(11): 2505-2511.
49. Salter AB, Folgar FA, Weissbrot J, et al. Macular hole surgery prognostic success rates based on macular hole size[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging, 2012,43(3):184-189.
50. Scupola A, Mastrocola A, Sasso P, et al. Assessment of retinal function before and after idiopathic macular hole surgery[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2013,156(1):132-139.
51. Hikichi T, Onodera A, Ishiko S, et al. Stereo acuity in patients with unilateral macular hole and after unilateral macular hole surgery[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2001,239(2):128-132.
52. Mireskandari K, Garnham L, Sheard R, et al. A prospective study of the effect of a unilateral macular hole on sensory and motor binocular function and recovery following successful surgery[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2004,88(10):1320-1324.
53. Sun Z, Gan D, Jiang C, et al. Effect of preoperative retinal sensitivity and fixation on long-term prognosis for idiopathic macular holes[J]. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2012,250(11):1587-1596.
54. Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Mandelcorn MS, et al. Fixation stability, fixation location, and visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2009,50(1):84-89.
55. 陈晶华,黎晓新,徐秀兰. 黄斑裂孔手术前后固视、微视野和mERG的检测[J]. 眼科研究,2002,20(4):328-331.
56. Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Nomura R, et al. Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001, 42(1):229-234.

Previous Article
特发性黄斑裂孔治疗进展
Next Article
增生性玻璃体视网膜病变中上皮-间质转化机制研究现状

Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases

特发性黄斑裂孔手术后黄斑形态功能评估研究现状与进展

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content