To address the conflict between the “fitness” and “feasibility” of body-fitted stents, this paper investigates the impact of various smoothing design strategies on the mechanical behaviour and apposition performance of stent. Based on the three-dimensional projection method, the projection region was fitted with the least squares method (fitting orders 1–6 corresponded to models 1–6, respectively) to achieve the effect of smoothing the body-fitted stent. The simulation included the crimping and expansion process of six groups of stents in stenotic vessels with different degrees of plaque calcification. Various metrics were analyzed, including bending stiffness, stent ruggedness, area residual stenosis rate, contact area fraction, and contact volume fraction. The study findings showed that the bending stiffness, stent ruggedness, area residual stenosis rate, contact area fraction and contact volume fraction increased with the fitting order's increase. Model 1 had the smallest contact area fraction and contact volume fraction, 77.63% and 83.49% respectively, in the incompletely calcified plaque environment. In the completely calcified plaque environment, these values were 72.86% and 82.21%, respectively. Additionally, it had the worst “fitness”. Models 5 and 6 had similar values for stent ruggedness, with 32.15% and 32.38%, respectively, which indicated the worst "feasibility" for fabrication and implantation. Models 2, 3, and 4 had similar area residual stenosis rates in both plaque environments. In conclusion, it is more reasonable to obtain the body-fitted stent by using 2nd to 4th order fitting with the least squares method to the projected region. Among them, the body-fitted stent obtained by the 2nd order fitting performs better in the completely calcified environment.
Citation： SUN Hao, TAO Keyi, LIU Zhao, DU Tianming, ZHANG Yanping, LIU Shengwen, FENG Jiling, QIAO Aike. Structural design of “fitness” and “feasibility” of body-fitted stent and its mechanical analysis. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2024, 41(4): 790-797, 806. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202403005 Copy