Impact of family nursing intervention on the quality of life in postoperative patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia_West China Medical Journal

Authors：

 MENG Xiaoqin , WANG Qi , ZHOU Hong , GAO Bin , WU Caiwen , YUAN Zhengyong

Department of Urology, People’s Hospital of Dujiangyan City, Du Jiangyan, Sichuan 611830, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

MENG Xiaoqin, Email: mxq_1979@163.com

Keywords：

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Family nursing intervention; Quality of life

DOI：

10.7507/1002-0179.201505156

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objecties To investigate the impact of family nursing intervention on the quality of life in postoperative patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods In total, 60 consecutive patients who underwent BPH surgeries between December 2012 and January 2014 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either timely outpatient follow-ups and routine rechecks (control group) or nursing intervention of telephone call follow-ups and family visits by professional nurses (intervention group). Quality of life was assessed by international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and generic quality of life inventory-74 (GQOLI-74), and was compared before and after intervention between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant differences in GQOLI-74 scores of all dimensions at discharge between the intervention group and the control group (P>0.05). However, six months after discharge, GQOLI-74 scores of all dimensions were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05), and were also significantly different from the scores at discharge in both groups (P<0.05). At discharge, IPSS scores were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Six months after discharge, IPSS scores of the intervention group (6.33±1.03) and the control group (7.83±0.94) were significantly different (P<0.05), and were also significantly different from the scores at discharge in the intervention group (7.93±1.31) and the control group (8.10±1.06) (P<0.05). Three patients in the control group (10.0%) were admitted into the hospital again due to bleeding, while there was no bleeding case in the intervention group. No such complications as urethrostenosis or urinary incontinence occurred in both groups. Conclusion Family nursing intervention improves effectively the quality of life in postoperative patients after surgeries for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Citation： MENGXiaoqin, WANGQi, ZHOUHong, GAOBin, WUCaiwen, YUANZhengyong. Impact of family nursing intervention on the quality of life in postoperative patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. West China Medical Journal, 2017, 32(2): 237-241. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201505156 Copy

1.	王蓓, 郝元涛, 吴捷, 等. 老年前列腺增生症患者生存质量影响因素的调查分析. 中华护理杂志, 2008, 43(4): 303-305.
2.	刘会范, 丁清清, 王君. 院外健康教育对良性前列腺增生患者前列腺电切术后生活质量的影响. 郑州大学学报: 医学版, 2012, 47(2): 238-240.
3.	聂迎春, 刘静. 家庭护理干预对精神分裂症患者预后的应用效果. 赣南医学院学报, 2014, 34(5): 808-809.
4.	李凌江, 杨德森. 生活质量综合评定问卷 (GQOLI-74) 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版) . 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 88-100.
5.	王蓓, 刘雪琴. 前列腺增生症患者的生活质量研究. 中国临床康复, 2005, 9(10): 182-184.
6.	史静琤, 蔡太生, 孙振球. 良性前列腺增生症患者生活质量研究进展. 中国医师杂志, 2003, 5(6): 862-864.
7.	龚曼, 伊庆同, 胡巍, 等. 经尿道前列腺电汽化术及等离子电切术后 5 年疗效随访. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2012, 33(5): 366-367.
8.	吴健, 舒适, 李霜, 等. 经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生. 华西医学, 2011, 26(5): 753-754.
9.	马诗敏. 健康教育对提高前列腺增生患者生活质量的效果观察. 中国现代医生, 2012, 50(35): 123-124, 127.
10.	褚爱桂, 蒋慧珍, 鲍文卿. 家庭访视对前列腺增生手术后患者生活质量的影响. 护理与康复, 2009, 8(4): 340-342.
11.	董文瑞, 廖凯, 马晋. 经尿道前列腺电切术后尿道狭窄原因分析及预防措施. 华西医学, 2009, 24(9): 2393-2395.
12.	陈晔, 邓燕青, 陈捷, 等. 自我管理干预改善良性前列腺增生患者下尿路症状及生活质量的效果评价. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2011, 32(9): 643-646.
13.	郑鸣, 曾铭强, 汪家兴, 等. 改良式 PKRP 术对 BPH 患者性功能及生活质量的影响. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2011, 31(5): 605-608.
14.	张丽, 刘长清, 刘玲. 经尿道前列腺切除术前后患者性功能调查中的问题与对策. 华西医学, 2015, 30(2): 312-314.
15.	刘雪琴, 王蓓, 刘春晓, 等. 老年前列腺增生症患者生存质量影响因素分析. 解放军护理杂志, 2005, 22(8): 18-20.

1. 王蓓, 郝元涛, 吴捷, 等. 老年前列腺增生症患者生存质量影响因素的调查分析. 中华护理杂志, 2008, 43(4): 303-305.
2. 刘会范, 丁清清, 王君. 院外健康教育对良性前列腺增生患者前列腺电切术后生活质量的影响. 郑州大学学报: 医学版, 2012, 47(2): 238-240.
3. 聂迎春, 刘静. 家庭护理干预对精神分裂症患者预后的应用效果. 赣南医学院学报, 2014, 34(5): 808-809.
4. 李凌江, 杨德森. 生活质量综合评定问卷 (GQOLI-74) 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版) . 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 88-100.
5. 王蓓, 刘雪琴. 前列腺增生症患者的生活质量研究. 中国临床康复, 2005, 9(10): 182-184.
6. 史静琤, 蔡太生, 孙振球. 良性前列腺增生症患者生活质量研究进展. 中国医师杂志, 2003, 5(6): 862-864.
7. 龚曼, 伊庆同, 胡巍, 等. 经尿道前列腺电汽化术及等离子电切术后 5 年疗效随访. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2012, 33(5): 366-367.
8. 吴健, 舒适, 李霜, 等. 经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生. 华西医学, 2011, 26(5): 753-754.
9. 马诗敏. 健康教育对提高前列腺增生患者生活质量的效果观察. 中国现代医生, 2012, 50(35): 123-124, 127.
10. 褚爱桂, 蒋慧珍, 鲍文卿. 家庭访视对前列腺增生手术后患者生活质量的影响. 护理与康复, 2009, 8(4): 340-342.
11. 董文瑞, 廖凯, 马晋. 经尿道前列腺电切术后尿道狭窄原因分析及预防措施. 华西医学, 2009, 24(9): 2393-2395.
12. 陈晔, 邓燕青, 陈捷, 等. 自我管理干预改善良性前列腺增生患者下尿路症状及生活质量的效果评价. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2011, 32(9): 643-646.
13. 郑鸣, 曾铭强, 汪家兴, 等. 改良式 PKRP 术对 BPH 患者性功能及生活质量的影响. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2011, 31(5): 605-608.
14. 张丽, 刘长清, 刘玲. 经尿道前列腺切除术前后患者性功能调查中的问题与对策. 华西医学, 2015, 30(2): 312-314.
15. 刘雪琴, 王蓓, 刘春晓, 等. 老年前列腺增生症患者生存质量影响因素分析. 解放军护理杂志, 2005, 22(8): 18-20.

West China Medical Journal

Impact of family nursing intervention on the quality of life in postoperative patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content