1. |
Wang W, Jiang B, Sun H, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of stroke in China: results from a nationwide population-based survey of 480 687 adults. Circulation, 2017, 135(8): 759-771.
|
2. |
GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol, 2019, 18(5): 459-480.
|
3. |
Ferrell AS, Britz GW. Developments on the horizon in the treatment of neurovascular problems. Surg Neurol Int, 2013, 4(Suppl 1): S31-S37.
|
4. |
Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the multi MERCI trial. Stroke, 2008, 39(4): 1205-1212.
|
5. |
Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators. The penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke, 2009, 40(8): 2761-2768.
|
6. |
Kabbasch C, Mpotsaris A, Chang DH, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy with the Trevo ProVue device in ischemic stroke patients: does improved visibility translate into a clinical benefit?. J Neurointerv Surg, 2016, 8(8): 778-782.
|
7. |
Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, et al. Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2017, 318(5): 443-452.
|
8. |
Martini M, Mocco J, Turk A, et al. ‘Real-world’ comparison of first-line direct aspiration and stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation: a multicenter international retrospective study. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(10): 957-963.
|
9. |
Turk AS 3rd, Siddiqui A, Fifi JT, et al. Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 2019, 393(10175): 998-1008.
|
10. |
Ye G, Lu J, Qi P, et al. Firstline a direct aspiration first pass technique versus firstline stent retriever for acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(8): 740-746.
|
11. |
Kang DH, Kim JW, Kim BM, et al. Need for rescue treatment and its implication: stent retriever versus contact aspiration thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(10): 979-983.
|
12. |
Tsang COA, Cheung IHW, Lau KK, et al. Outcomes of stent retriever versus aspiration-first thrombectomy in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2018, 39(11): 2070-2076.
|
13. |
Nishi H, Ishii A, Nakahara I, et al. Different learning curves between stent retrieval and a direct aspiration first-pass technique for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurosurg, 2018, 129(6): 1456-1463.
|
14. |
Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, et al. Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 2012, 380(9849): 1241-1249.
|
15. |
Sheth SA, Jahan R, Levy EI, et al. Rapid learning curve for Solitaire FR stent retriever therapy: evidence from roll-in and randomised patients in the SWIFT trial. J Neurointerv Surg, 2016, 8(4): 347-352.
|
16. |
Hentschel KA, Daou B, Chalouhi N, et al. Comparison of non-stent retriever and stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy devices for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurosurg, 2017, 126(4): 1123-1130.
|
17. |
Fahed R, Di Maria F, Rosso C, et al. A leap forward in the endovascular management of acute basilar artery occlusion since the appearance of stent retrievers: a single-center comparative study. J Neurosurg, 2017, 126(5): 1578-1584.
|
18. |
Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Nogueira RG, et al. TREVO stent-retriever mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion registry. J Neurointerv Surg, 2018, 10(6): 516-524.
|
19. |
Saber H, Rajah GB, Kherallah RY, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of thrombectomy devices in acute stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Neurointerv Surg, 2018, 10(8): 729-734.
|
20. |
Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(1): 11-20.
|
21. |
Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(24): 2296-2306.
|
22. |
Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(24): 2285-2295.
|
23. |
Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(11): 1009-1018.
|
24. |
Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(11): 1019-1030.
|
25. |
Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet, 2016, 387(10029): 1723-1731.
|
26. |
Campbell BC, Hill MD, Rubiera M, et al. Safety and efficacy of solitaire stent thrombectomy: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Stroke, 2016, 47(3): 798-806.
|
27. |
Shireman TI, Wang K, Saver JL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of solitaire stent retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: results from the SWIFT-PRIME trial (solitaire with the intention for thrombectomy as primary endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke). Stroke, 2017, 48(2): 379-387.
|
28. |
Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(1): 11-21.
|
29. |
Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(8): 708-718.
|
30. |
Zaidat OO, Bozorgchami H, Ribó M, et al. Primary results of the multicenter ARISE II study (Analysis of Revascularization in Ischemic Stroke with EmboTrap). Stroke, 2018, 49(5): 1107-1115.
|
31. |
Machi P, Costalat V, Lobotesis K, et al. Solitaire FR thrombectomy system: immediate results in 56 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg, 2018, 10(Suppl 1): i27-i32.
|
32. |
Mokin M, Sonig A, Sivakanthan S, et al. Clinical and procedural predictors of outcomes from the endovascular treatment of posterior circulation strokes. Stroke, 2016, 47(3): 782-788.
|
33. |
Baik SH, Jung C, Kim BM, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for tandem vertebrobasilar stroke: characteristics and treatment outcome. Stroke, 2020, 51(6): 1883-1885.
|
34. |
中国卒中学会, 中国卒中学会神经介入分会, 中华预防医学会卒中预防与控制专业委员会介入学组. 急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗中国指南 2018. 中国卒中杂志, 2018, 13(7): 706-729.
|
35. |
Eesa M, Burns PA, Almekhlafi MA, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire stent: is there a learning curve in achieving rapid recanalization times?. J Neurointerv Surg, 2014, 6(9): 649-651.
|