• 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, the Fourth People’s Hospital of Langfang, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Langfang, Heibei 065700, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Anesthesiology, the Fourth People’s Hospital of Langfang, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Langfang, Heibei 065700, P. R. China;
  • 3. Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P. R. China;
KANG Yan, Email: kang_yan_123@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To evaluate the feasibility of hyperinsulinemic normoglycemia strategy in critically ill patients. Methods  Between January 2020 and October 2021, the critically ill patients with stress hyperglycemia in the Emergency Intensive Care Unit of the Fourth People’s Hospital of Langfang were randomly assigned into a trial group or a control group. The trial group adopted hyperinsulinemic normoglycemia therapy, while the control group adopted conventional glucose control therapy. The mean and variability (standard deviation) of blood glucose, incidences of severe hypoglycemia and abnormal hyperglycemia, as well as the percentage of blood glucose values within the target range were compared between the two groups, to evaluate the feasibility of hyperinsulinemic normoglycemia strategy in critically ill patients from the perspective of safety and effectiveness. The non-normally distributed measurement data were presented as median (lower quartile, upper quartile). Results  A total of eighty patients were included, with forty cases in each group. The mean blood glucose level [6.00 (5.74, 6.70) vs. 9.51 (8.74, 10.01) mmol/L, P<0.001], the standard deviation of glucose level [1.58 (1.11, 2.15) vs. 2.20 (1.21, 2.76) mmol/L, P=0.028], and the glycemic lability index [175.52 (100.51, 346.69) vs. 408.51 (205.56, 651.91) mmol2/(L2·h·d), P<0.001] were all smaller in the trial group than those in the control group. The percentage of blood glucose values within the target range was 77.34% in the trial group and 5.33% in the control group, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). No patients experienced severe hypoglycemia. There was a significant difference in the incidence of abnormal hyperglycemia between the two groups (5.08% vs. 36.16%, P<0.001). Conclusions  Hyperinsulinemic normoglycemia strategy can effectively and safely provide normoglycemia, reduce glycemic variability, and achieve good glycemic control in critically ill patients. Hyperinsulinemic normoglycemia strategy may be a new approach to glycemic control in critically ill patients.

Citation: LI Yunwei, ZUO Yanyan, KANG Yan. Feasibility of hyperinsulinemic normoglycemia strategy in critically ill patients. West China Medical Journal, 2022, 37(6): 875-879. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.202201106 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for vascular cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Analysis of the impact of medical service price adjustment on hospitalization expenses after removing medicine makeups