• 1. Orthopaedic Center, the Sixth People’s Hospital of Huizhou, Huizhou, Guangdong 516211, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524000, P. R. China;
CHEN Guanghua, Email: 404654885@qq.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To investigate the necessity of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fracture with locking plate. Methods  We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database and VIP database for all the articles about the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures using locking plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction or locking plate alone from the establishment of databases to November 30th, 2022. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected the documents that met the requirements of this paper, and extracted the effective data after evaluating the quality of the documents, including the Constant-Murley score, coracoclavicular distance, fracture healing time, complication rate, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length and the Visual Analogue Scale score of postoperative pain. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results  A total of 11 retrospective cohort studies were included, and the overall quality of the literature was high. A total of 421 cases were included in this study, including 209 cases in the locking plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction group and 212 cases in the locking plate group. The results of meta-analysis showed that locking plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures was superior to locking plate alone in the Constant-Murley score [mean difference (MD)=7.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.84, 11.87), P=0.001], coracoclavicular distance [MD=–1.22 mm, 95%CI (–1.92, –0.53) mm, P=0.0006], fracture healing time [MD=–2.76 weeks, 95%CI (–4.74, –0.79) weeks, P=0.006] and complication rate [odds ratio=0.31, 95%CI (0.14, 0.68), P=0.004], but the former had longer operative time [MD=9.27 min, 95%CI (4.53, 14.01) min, P=0.0001]. There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss [MD=3.31 mL, 95%CI (–17.01, 23.63) mL, P=0.75], incision length [MD=0.30 cm, 95%CI (–0.11, 0.71) cm, P=0.15], or Visual Analogue Scale score of postoperative pain [MD=–0.26, 95%CI (–0.79, 0.27), P=0.33]. Conclusions  Although the reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament increases the time of surgery, locking plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures is significantly better than locking plate alone in terms of reduction quality, shoulder function recovery, fracture healing time, and the incidence of complications, without significant intraoperative bleeding, prolonged incision or postoperative pain.

Citation: WANG Tao, LOU Yuanyi, CHEN Zhoutao, HUANG Yongbin, LI Liwei, HUANG Chunman, PANG Jingqun, CHEN Guanghua. A meta-analysis of the necessity of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in the treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures with locking plate. West China Medical Journal, 2023, 38(6): 892-900. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.202301035 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Visual analysis of traditional Chinese medicine prescription for systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren syndrome based on VOSviewer software
  • Next Article

    Efficacy and safety of letrozole combined with metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome infertility: a meta-analysis