• Department of Orthopedics-Sports Medicine/Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110000, P.R.China;
ZHANG Hangzhou, Email: zhanghz1000@sina.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To compare the strength difference between the interfacial screw and the interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology to fix the tibial end of ligament during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction through the biomechanical test.Methods Twenty fresh frozen pig tibia were randomly divided into two groups (n=10) to prepare ACL reconstruction models. The graft tendons in the experimental group were fixed with interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology, and the graft tendons in the control group were fixed with interfacial screw. The two groups of specimens were fixed in the high-frequency dynamic mechanics test system M-3000, and the length change (displacement), ultimate load, and stiffness of graft tendons were measured through the reciprocating test and load-failure test.Results The results of reciprocating test showed that the displacement of the experimental group was (3.06±0.58) mm, and that of the control group was (2.82±0.46) mm, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.641, P=0.529). The load-failure test results showed that the stiffness of the experimental group and the control group were (95.39±13.63) and (91.38±14.28) N/mm, respectively, with no significant difference (t=1.021, P=0.321). The ultimate load of the experimental group was (743.15±173.96) N, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (574.70±74.43) N (t=2.648, P=0.016).Conclusion In ACL reconstruction, the fixation strength of tibial end with interface screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology is obviously better than that of interface screw alone.

Citation: SUN Rui, ZHUANG Leiting, DUAN Mingyi, LIU Xunqi, ZHANG Hangzhou. Biomechanical research of anterior cruciate ligament fixation by tibial interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2021, 35(10): 1298-1302. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202104009 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Effectiveness comparison of arthroscopic intertubercular groove and open subpectoral tenodesis for long head of biceps tendon tendinopathy
  • Next Article

    Performance evaluation of two antigen-extracted xenogeneic ostein and experimental study on repairing skull defects in rats