1. |
Zarie M, Mohamoud MF, Farhoud AR, et al. Evaluation of the inter and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification of intertrochanteric fractures and the device choice (DHS, PFNA, and DCS) of fixations. Ethiop J Health Sci, 2020, 30(5): 755-760.
|
2. |
Su H, Liu H, Liu J, et al. Elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures after intramedullary fixation: Analysis of risk factors for calf muscular vein thrombosis. Orthopade, 2018, 47(4): 341-346.
|
3. |
Kumar P, Rajnish RK, Sharma S, et al. Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop, 2020, 44(4): 623-633.
|
4. |
张世民, 胡孙君, 杜守超, 等. 股骨转子间骨折一种新的综合分类法. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(9): 1056-1063.
|
5. |
Olczak J, Emilson F, Razavian A, et al. Ankle fracture classification using deep learning: automating detailed AO Foundation/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 2018 malleolar fracture identification reaches a high degree of correct classification. Acta Orthop, 2021, 92(1): 102-108.
|
6. |
Trompeter AJ, Furness H, Kanakaris NK, et al. Classification of open fractures: the need to modernize. Bone Joint J, 2020, 102-B(11): 1431-1434.
|
7. |
Klaber I, Besa P, Sandoval F, et al. The new AO classification system for intertrochanteric fractures allows better agreement than the original AO classification. An inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation. Injury, 2021, 52(1): 102-105.
|
8. |
Chan G, Hughes K, Barakat A, et al. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the new AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures. Injury, 2021, 52(6): 1434-1437.
|
9. |
Yin B, He Y, Wang D, et al. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification. Injury, 2021, 52(6): 1500-1505.
|
10. |
Urrutia J, Zamora T, Besa P, et al. Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area. Injury, 2015, 46(6): 1054-1058.
|
11. |
van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Meylaerts SA, et al. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. Injury, 2010, 41(4): 377-381.
|
12. |
Hsu CE, Huang KC, Lin TC, et al. Integrated risk scoring model for predicting dynamic hip screw treatment outcome of intertrochanteric fracture. Injury, 2016, 47(11): 2501-2506.
|
13. |
Hsu CE, Shih CM, Wang CC, et al. Lateral femoral wall thickness. A reliable predictor of post-operative lateral wall fracture in intertrochanteric fractures. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(8): 1134-1138.
|
14. |
Busato TS, Baldasso D, Matioski Filho GR, et al. Evaluation of the intraobserver and interobserver agreements of the new AO/OTA classification for fractures of the trochanteric region and the femoral neck. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo), 2021, 57(2): 241-249.
|
15. |
Yıldırım C, Muratoğlu OG, Turan K, et al. The intra- and interobserver reliability of five commonly used intertrochanteric femur fracture classification systems. Jt Dis Relat Surg, 2022, 33(1): 187-192.
|
16. |
尹博, 周君琳, 何远铭, 等. 股骨转子间骨折三维新分型的可靠性分析. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2020, 22(1): 55-59.
|
17. |
Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF. Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1979, 61(2): 216-221.
|
18. |
Shoda E, Kitada S, Sasaki Y, et al. Proposal of new classification of femoral trochanteric fracture by three-dimensional computed tomography and relationship to usual plain X-ray classification. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2017, 25(1): 2309499017692700. doi: 10.1177/2309499017692700.
|
19. |
Kijima H, Yamada S, Konishi N, et al. The reliability of classifications of proximal femoral fractures with 3-dimensional computed tomography: the new concept of comprehensive classification. Adv Orthop, 2014, 2014: 359689. doi: 10.1155/2014/359689.
|
20. |
徐龙, 林清宇, 王宝虎, 等. 股骨粗隆间骨折AO分型对围手术期隐性失血的影响. 第二军医大学学报, 2017, 38(7): 951-953.
|