1. |
|
2. |
|
3. |
|
4. |
|
5. |
|
6. |
|
7. |
Tarabichi S, Baker CM, Lizcano JD, et al. Porous metal augments have comparable outcomes to other constructs for severe acetabular bone loss at mid-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 2024.
|
8. |
Chaudhry F, Daud A, Greenberg A, et al. Cup-cage constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. Bone Joint J, 2024, 106-B(5 Supple B): 66-73.
|
9. |
|
10. |
Callary SA, Broekhuis D, Barends J, et al. Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity. Bone Joint J, 2024, 106-B(5 Supple B): 74-81.
|
11. |
Mu W, Xu B, Wahafu T, et al. What are the functional, radiographic, and survivorship outcomes of a modified cup-cage technique for pelvic discontinuity? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2024.
|
12. |
|
13. |
|
14. |
|
15. |
|
16. |
|
17. |
|
18. |
|
19. |
|
20. |
|
21. |
|
22. |
|
23. |
Wassilew GI, Zimmerer A, Fischer M, et al. Reconstruction of Paprosky ⅢB acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments using the footing technique. Bone Joint J, 2024, 106-B(5 Supple B): 54-58.
|
24. |
|
25. |
|
26. |
|
27. |
|
28. |
|
29. |
|
30. |
|
31. |
|
32. |
|
33. |
|
34. |
Rhee I, Tirosh O, Ho A, et al. Do certain patient cohorts benefit from different surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty, 2023, 38(8): 1545-1550.
|
35. |
|
36. |
|
37. |
|
38. |
|
39. |
|
40. |
|
41. |
|
42. |
|
43. |
|
44. |
|
45. |
|
46. |
|
47. |
|
48. |
|
49. |
|
50. |
|
51. |
Ballester Alfaro JJ, Sueiro Fernández J. Trabecular metal buttress augment and the trabecular metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Hip Int, 2010, 20 Suppl 7: S119-S127.
|
52. |
|
53. |
|
54. |
|
55. |
|