Applications and prospects of graphene and its derivatives in bone repair_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

DU Zhipo ¹ , MA Yizhan ² ^{共同第一作者} , WANG Cunyang ² ,  ZHANG Ruihong ³ ,  LI Xiaoming ²

1. Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Central Hospital of Baoding City, Baoding Hebei, 072350, P. R. China;
2. Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, P. R. China;
3. Department of Science and Education, the Fourth Central Hospital of Baoding City, Baoding Hebei, 072350, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

ZHANG Ruihong, Email: 13931391449@163.com; LI Xiaoming, Email: x.m.li@hotmail.com

Keywords：

Graphene and its derivatives; graphene oxide; bone repair; signaling pathway

DOI：

10.7507/1002-1892.202410011

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To summarize the latest research progress of graphene and its derivatives (GDs) in bone repair. Methods The relevant research literature at home and abroad in recent years were extensive accessed. The properties of GDs in bone repair materials, including mechanical properties, electrical conductivity, and antibacterial properties, were systematically summarized, and the unique advantages of GDs in material preparation, functionalization, and application, as well as the contributions and challenges to bone tissue engineering, were discussed. Results The application of GDs in bone repair materials has broad prospects, and the functionalization and modification technology effectively improve the osteogenic activity and material properties of GDs. GDs can induce osteogenic differentiation of stem cells through specific signaling pathways and promote osteogenic activity through immunomodulatory mechanisms. In addition, the parameters of GDs have significant effects on the cytotoxicity and degradation behavior. Conclusion GDs has great potential in the field of bone repair because of its excellent physical and chemical properties and biological properties. However, the cytotoxicity, biodegradability, and functionalization strategies of GDs still need to be further studied in order to achieve a wider application in the field of bone tissue engineering.

1.	Liu M, Zeng X, Ma C, et al. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Bone Res, 2017, 5: 17014. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00694.
2.	Kumawat VS, Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh S, Ghosh SB. An overview of translational research in bone graft biomaterials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2023, 34(4): 497-540.
3.	Findeisen S, Gräfe N, Schwilk M, et al. Use of autologous bone graft with bioactive glass as a bone substitute in the treatment of large-sized bone defects of the femur and tibia. J Pers Med, 2023, 13(12): 1644. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121644.
4.	Li G, Zhou T, Lin S, et al. Nanomaterials for craniofacial and dental tissue engineering. J Dent Res, 2017, 96(7): 725-732.
5.	Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, Maleki A, de la Guardia M, et al. Carbon based nanomaterials for tissue engineering of bone: Building new bone on small black scaffolds: A review. J Adv Res, 2019, 18: 185-201.
6.	Shin SR, Li YC, Jang HL, et al. Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2016, 105(Pt B): 255-274.
7.	Liu S, Li S, Wang Q, et al. Effect of polycarboxylate-silane modified graphene oxide composite on the properties of cement pastes. Materials (Basel), 2022, 15(15): 5313. doi: 10.3390/ma15155313.
8.	Narayan J, Bezborah K. Recent advances in the functionalization, substitutional doping and applications of graphene/graphene composite nanomaterials. RSC Adv, 2024, 14(19): 13413-13444.
9.	Barba-Rosado LV, Carrascal-Hernández DC, Insuasty D, et al. Graphene oxide (GO) for the treatment of bone cancer: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2024, 14(2): 186. doi: 10.3390/nano14020186.
10.	Zhou H, Chen J, Zhang X, et al. Exploring the application of graphene oxide-based nanomaterials in the repair of osteoporotic fractures. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2024, 14(6): 553. doi: 10.3390/nano14060553.
11.	Gou Q, Cai X, Yan Z, et al. Highly selective Pb(Ⅱ) adsorption by DTPA-functionalized graphene oxide/carboxymethyl cellulose aerogel. Langmuir, 2024, 40(15): 8002-8014.
12.	Li Y, Zhang K, Yin Y, et al. Amino-functionalized graphene oxide affects bacteria-phage interactions in aquatic environments. Water Res, 2024, 259: 121840. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121840.
13.	Jaramillo-Fierro X, Cuenca G. Theoretical and experimental analysis of hydroxyl and epoxy group effects on graphene oxide properties. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2024, 14(8): 714. doi: 10.3390/nano14080714.
14.	Tan QC, Jiang XS, Chen L, et al. Bioactive graphene oxide-functionalized self-expandable hydrophilic and osteogenic nanocomposite for orthopaedic applications. Mater Today Bio, 2022, 18: 100500. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100500.
15.	Potbhare AK, Aziz SKT, Ayyub MM, et al. Bioinspired graphene-based metal oxide nanocomposites for photocatalytic and electrochemical performances: an updated review. Nanoscale Adv, 2024, 6(10): 2539-2568.
16.	Dinescu S, Ionita M, Ignat SR, et al. Graphene oxide enhances chitosan-based 3D scaffold properties for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(20): 5077. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205077.
17.	Yu P, Bao RY, Shi XJ, et al. Self-assembled high-strength hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide/chitosan composite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym, 2017, 155: 507-515.
18.	Saravanan S, Vimalraj S, Anuradha D. Chitosan based thermoresponsive hydrogel containing graphene oxide for bone tissue repair. Biomed Pharmacother, 2018, 107: 908-917.
19.	Li D, Nie W, Chen L, et al. Self-assembled hydroxyapatite-graphene scaffold for photothermal cancer therapy and bone regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2018, 14(12): 2003-2017.
20.	Li K, Wang C, Yan J, et al. Evaluation of the osteogenesis and osseointegration of titanium alloys coated with graphene: an in vivo study. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 1843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19742-y.
21.	Shariati A, Hosseini SM, Chegini Z, et al. Graphene-based materials for inhibition of wound infection and accelerating wound healing. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 158: 114184. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114184.
22.	Wu M, Zou L, Jiang L, et al. Osteoinductive and antimicrobial mechanisms of graphene-based materials for enhancing bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2021, 15(11): 915-935.
23.	Chen Y, Zheng Z, Zhou R, et al. Developing a strontium-releasing graphene oxide-/collagen-based organic-inorganic nanobiocomposite for large bone defect regeneration via MAPK signaling pathway. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11(17): 15986-15997.
24.	Bordoni V, Reina G, Orecchioni M, et al. Stimulation of bone formation by monocyte-activator functionalized graphene oxide in vivo. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(41): 19408-19421.
25.	He Y, Li Y, Chen G, et al. Concentration-dependent cellular behavior and osteogenic differentiation effect induced in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells treated with magnetic graphene oxide. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2020, 108(1): 50-60.
26.	Das S, Singh S, Singh V, et al. Oxygenated functional group density on graphene oxide: Its effect on cell toxicity. Particle, 2013, 30(2): 148-157.
27.	Kurapati R, Mukherjee SP, Martín C, et al. Degradation of single-layer and few-layer graphene by neutrophil myeloperoxidase. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2018, 57(36): 11722-11727.
28.	Zhang W, Fang XX, Li QC, et al. Reduced graphene oxide-embedded nerve conduits loaded with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Neural Regen Res, 2023, 18(1): 200-206.
29.	Ibrahim A, Klopocinska A, Horvat K, et al. Graphene-based nanocomposites: Synthesis, mechanical properties, and characterizations. Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13(17): 2869. doi: 10.3390/polym13172869.
30.	Young LJ, Kinloch IA, Gong L, et al. The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: A review. Composites Science and Technology, 2012, 72(12): 1459-1476.
31.	Kim HJ, Seo KJ, Kim DE. Investigation of mechanical behavior of single- and multi-layer graphene by using molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2016, 17(12): 1693-1701.
32.	Eqra R, Janghorban K, Manesh HD. Effect of number of graphene layers on mechanical and dielectric properties of graphene—epoxy nanocomposites. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 2015, 44(10): 405-412.
33.	Tang YF, Chen L, Duan ZH, et al. Graphene/barium titanate/polymethyl methacrylate bio-piezoelectric composites for biomedical application. Ceramics International, 2020, 46(5): 6567-6574.
34.	Jing X, Xu C, Su W, et al. Photosensitive and conductive hydrogel induced innerved bone regeneration for infected bone defect repair. Adv Healthc Mater, 2023, 12(3): e2201349. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201349.
35.	Zhao G, Li X, Huang M, et al. The physics and chemistry of graphene-on-surfaces. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46(15): 4417-4449.
36.	Thompson BC, Murray E, Wallace GG. Graphite oxide to graphene. Biomaterials to bionics. Adv Mater, 2015, 27(46): 7563-7582.
37.	Shuai CJ, Zeng ZC, Yang YW, et al. Graphene oxide assists polyvinylidene fluoride scaffold to reconstruct electrical microenvironment of bone tissue. Materials & Design, 2020, 190: 108564. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108564.
38.	Ningrum DR, Hanif W, Mardhian DF, et al. In vitro biocompatibility of hydrogel polyvinyl alcohol/moringa oleifera leaf extract/graphene oxide for wound dressing. Polymers (Basel), 2023, 15(2): 468. doi: 10.3390/polym15020468.
39.	Chen J, Zhang X, Cai H, et al. Osteogenic activity and antibacterial effect of zinc oxide/carboxylated graphene oxide nanocomposites: Preparation and in vitro evaluation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2016, 147: 397-407.
40.	Paz E, Ballesteros Y, Forriol F, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide functionalisation with silanes for advanced dispersion and reinforcement of PMMA-based bone cements. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 104: 109946. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109946.
41.	Vuppaladadium SSR, Agarwal T, Kulanthaivel S, et al. Silanization improves biocompatibility of graphene oxide. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2020, 110: 110647. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110647.
42.	Sun J, Deng Y, Li J, et al. A new graphene derivative: Hydroxylated graphene with excellent biocompatibility. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(16): 10226-10233.
43.	Jia Z, Shi Y, Xiong P, et al. From solution to biointerface: Graphene self-assemblies of varying lateral sizes and surface properties for biofilm control and osteodifferentiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(27): 17151-17165.
44.	Liu H, Cheng J, Chen F, et al. Biomimetic and cell-mediated mineralization of hydroxyapatite by carrageenan functionalized graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6(5): 3132-3140.
45.	Sharma R, Kapusetti G, Bhong SY, et al. Osteoconductive amine-functionalized graphene-poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement composite with controlled exothermic polymerization. Bioconjug Chem, 2017, 28(9): 2254-2265.
46.	Padmavathy N, Jaidev LR, Bose S, et al. Oligomer-grafted graphene in a soft nanocomposite augments mechanical properties and biological activity. Materials & Design, 2017, 126: 238-249.
47.	Liu X, Ma D, Tang H, et al. Polyamidoamine dendrimer and oleic acid-functionalized graphene as biocompatible and efficient gene delivery vectors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6(11): 8173-8183.
48.	Dou C, Ding N, Luo F, et al. Graphene-based microRNA transfection blocks preosteoclast fusion to increase bone formation and vascularization. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2017, 5(2): 1700578. doi: 10.1002/advs.202102286.
49.	Eckhart KE, Holt BD, Laurencin MG, et al. Covalent conjugation of bioactive peptides to graphene oxide for biomedical applications. Biomater Sci, 2019, 7(9): 3876-3885.
50.	Li KH, Zhang ZF, Li DP, et al. Biomimetic Ultralight, Highly Porous, Shape-Adjustable, and Biocompatible 3D Graphene Minerals via Incorporation of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanosheets. Advanced Function Materials, 2018, 28(29): 1801056. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201801056.
51.	Kang ES, Kim DS, Han Y, et al. Three-dimensional graphene-RGD peptide nanoisland composites that enhance the osteogenesis of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(3): 669. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030669.
52.	Zhang W, Yang G, Wang X, et al. Magnetically controlled growth-factor-immobilized multilayer cell sheets for complex tissue regeneration. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(43). doi: 10.1002/adma.201703795.
53.	Yao Q, Liu Y, Sun H. Heparin-dopamine functionalized graphene foam for sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2018, 12(6): 1519-1529.
54.	Unnithan AR, Sasikala ARK, Park CH, et al. A unique scaffold for bone tissue engineering: An osteogenic combination of graphene oxide-hyaluronic acid-chitosan with simvastatin. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2017, 46: 182-191.
55.	Sun HH, Zhang LF, Xia W, et al. Fabrication of graphene oxide-modified chitosan for controlled release of dexamethasone phosphate. Applied Physics A, 2016, 122(7): 632. doi: 10.1007/s00339-016-0029-4.
56.	Weng W, Nie W, Zhou Q, et al. Controlled release of vancomycin from 3D porous graphene-based composites for dual-purpose treatment of infected bone defects. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(5): 2753-2765.
57.	Patil S, Rajkuberan C, Sagadevan S. Recent biomedical advancements in graphene oxide and future perspectives. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 2023, 86: 104737. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104737.
58.	Yi X, Gao H. Cell interaction with graphene microsheets: near-orthogonal cutting versus parallel attachment. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(12): 5457-5467.
59.	Peruzynska M, Cendrowski K, Barylak M, et al. Comparative in vitro study of single and four layer graphene oxide nanoflakes-Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake. Toxicol In Vitro, 2017, 41: 205-213.
60.	Mohammed H, Kumar A, Bekyarova E, et al. Antimicrobial mechanisms and effectiveness of graphene and graphene-Functionalized biomaterials. A scope review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8: 465. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00465.
61.	Alfei S, Schito GC, Schito AM, et al. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated antibacterial oxidative therapies: Available methods to generate ROS and a novel option proposal. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(13): 7182. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137182.
62.	Endale HT, Tesfaye W, Mengstie TA. ROS induced lipid peroxidation and their role in ferroptosis. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2023, 11: 1226044. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1226044.
63.	Zhang W, Yan L, Li M, et al. Deciphering the underlying mechanisms of oxidation-state dependent cytotoxicity of graphene oxide on mammalian cells. Toxicol Lett, 2015, 237(2): 61-71.
64.	Teixeira-Santos R, Belo S, Vieira R, et al. Graphene-based composites for biomedical applications: Surface modification for enhanced antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility. Biomolecules, 2023, 13(11): 1571. doi: 10.3390/biom13111571.
65.	Anitasari S, Wu CZ, Shen YK. PCL/graphene scaffolds for the osteogenesis process. Bioengineering (Basel), 2023, 10(3): 305. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030305.
66.	Liang C, Luo Y, Yang G, et al. Graphene oxide hybridized nHAC/PLGA scaffolds facilitate the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2018, 13(1): 15. doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2432-6.
67.	Li XJ, Lin KL, Wang ZL. Enhanced growth and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells on Ti6Al4V alloys modified with reduced graphene oxide. Rsc Advances, 2017, 7(24): 14430-14437.
68.	Newby SD, Masi T, Griffin CD, et al. Functionalized graphene nanoparticles induce human mesenchymal stem cells to express distinct extracellular matrix proteins mediating osteogenesis. Int J Nanomedicine, 2020, 15: 2501-2513.
69.	Zou Y, Qazvini NT, Zane K, et al. Gelatin-derived graphene-silicate hybrid materials are biocompatible and synergistically promote BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9(19): 15922-15932.
70.	Yu S, You M, Zhou K, et al. Progress of research on graphene and its derivatives in bone and cartilage repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023, 11: 1185520. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1185520.
71.	Qiu JJ, Guo JS, Geng H, et al. Three-dimensional porous graphene nanosheets synthesized on the titanium surface for osteogenic differentiation of rat bone mesenchymal stem cells. Carbon, 2017, 125: 227-235.
72.	Lyu H, He Z, Chan YK, et al. Hierarchical ZnO nanotube/graphene oxide nanostructures endow pure Zn implant with synergistic bactericidal activity and osteogenicity. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(42): 19377-19385.
73.	Shahin M, Munir K, Wen C, et al. Magnesium-based composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets as biodegradable implant materials. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2020, 828: 154461. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154461.
74.	Zhao Y, Chen JD, Zou L, et al, Facile one-step bioinspired mineralization by chitosan functionalized with graphene oxide to activate bone endogenous regeneration. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 378: 122174. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122174.
75.	Oğuz ÖD, Ege D. Preparation of graphene oxide-reinforced calcium phosphate/calcium sulfate/methylcellulose-based injectable bone substitutes. MRS Communications, 2019, 9(4): 1174-1180.
76.	Li J, Jiang H, Ouyang X, et al. CaCO₃/tetraethylenepentamine-graphene hollow microspheres as biocompatible bone drug carriers for controlled release. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(44): 30027-30036.
77.	Tang J, Cao W, Zhang Y, et al. Properties of vaterite-containing tricalcium silicate composited graphene oxide for biomaterials. Biomed Mater, 2019, 14(4): 045004. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab0de3.
78.	Dai C, Li Y, Pan W, et al. Three-dimensional high-porosity chitosan/honeycomb porous carbon/hydroxyapatite scaffold with enhanced osteoinductivity for bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2020, 6(1): 575-586.
79.	Li J, Liu X, Tomaskovic-Crook E, et al. Smart graphene-cellulose paper for 2D or 3D “origami-inspired” human stem cell support and differentiation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2019, 176: 87-95.
80.	Liu S, Zhou C, Mou S, et al. Biocompatible graphene oxide-collagen composite aerogel for enhanced stiffness and in situ bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 105: 110137. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110137.
81.	Unagolla JM, Jayasuriya AC. Enhanced cell functions on graphene oxide incorporated 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 102: 1-11.
82.	Bhusari SA, Sharma V, Bose S, et al. HDPE/UHMWPE hybrid nanocomposites with surface functionalized graphene oxide towards improved strength and cytocompatibility. J R Soc Interface, 2019, 16(150): 20180273. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0273.
83.	Feng ZU, Li Y, Hao L, et al. Graphene-reinforced biodegradable resin composites for stereolithographic 3D printing of bone structure scaffolds. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2019, 2019: 9710264. doi: 10.1155/2019/9710264.
84.	Liu C, Wong HM, Yeung KWK, et al. Novel electrospun polylactic acid nanocomposite fiber mats with hybrid graphene oxide and nanohydroxyapatite reinforcements having enhanced biocompatibility. Polymers (Basel), 2016, 8(8): 287. doi: 10.3390/polym8080287.
85.	Qi C, Deng Y, Xu L, et al. A sericin/ graphene oxide composite scaffold as a biomimetic extracellular matrix for structural and functional repair of calvarial bone. Theranostics, 2020, 10(2): 741-756.
86.	Zhang W, Chang Q, Xu L, et al. Graphene oxide-copper nanocomposite-coated porous CaP scaffold for vascularized bone regeneration via activation of Hif-1α. Adv Healthc Mater, 2016, 5(11): 1299-1309.
87.	Halim A, Liu L, Ariyanti AD, et al. Low-dose suspended graphene oxide nanosheets induce antioxidant response and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via JNK-dependent FoxO1 activation. J Mater Chem B, 2019, 7(39): 5998-6009.
88.	Zhao M, Dai Y, Li X, et al. Evaluation of long-term biocompatibility and osteogenic differentiation of graphene nanosheet doped calcium phosphate-chitosan AZ91D composites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2018, 90: 365-378.
89.	Yu Z, Xiao C, Huang Y, et al. Enhanced bioactivity and osteoinductivity of carboxymethyl chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite/graphene oxide nanocomposites. RSC Adv, 2018, 8(32): 17860-17877.
90.	Yang X, Zhao Q, Chen Y, et al. Effects of graphene oxide and graphene oxide quantum dots on the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 2019, 47(1): 822-832.
91.	Yan X, Yang W, Shao Z, et al. Graphene/single-walled carbon nanotube hybrids promoting osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by activating p38 signaling pathway. Int J Nanomedicine, 2016, 11: 5473-5484.
92.	Kim HD, Kim J, Koh RH, et al. Enhanced osteogenic commitment of human mesenchymal stem cells on polyethylene glycol-based cryogel with graphene oxide substrate. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2017, 3(10): 2470-2479.
93.	Noh M, Kim SH, Kim J, et al. Graphene oxide reinforced hydrogels for osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(34): 20779-20788.
94.	Wu CT, Xia LG, Han PP, et al. Graphene-oxide-modified β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics stimulate in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis. Carbon, 2015, 93: 116-129.
95.	Wu X, Zheng S, Ye Y, et al. Enhanced osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) by graphene via activation of PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signal circuit. Biomater Sci, 2018, 6(5): 1147-1158.
96.	Vallés G, Bensiamar F, Maestro-Paramio L, et al. Influence of inflammatory conditions provided by macrophages on osteogenic ability of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2020, 11(1): 57. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-1578-1.
97.	Zheng Y, Pescatore N, Gogotsi Y, et al. Rapid adsorption of proinflammatory cytokines by graphene nanoplatelets and their composites for extracorporeal detoxification. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2018, 2018: 6274072. doi: 10.1155/2018/6274072.
98.	Kharlamova MV, Kramberger C. Cytotoxicity of carbon nanotubes, graphene, fullerenes, and dots. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2023, 13(9): 1458. doi: 10.3390/nano13091458.
99.	Pang L, Dai C, Bi L, et al. Biosafety and antibacterial ability of graphene and graphene oxide in vitro and in vivo. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2017, 12(1): 564. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2317-0.
100.	Wychowaniec JK, Litowczenko J, Tadyszak K. Fabricating versatile cell supports from nano- and micro-sized graphene oxide flakes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020, 103: 103594. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103594.
101.	Wu Y, Wang F, Wang S, et al. Reduction of graphene oxide alters its cyto-compatibility towards primary and immortalized macrophages. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(30): 14637-14650.
102.	Zhou K, Yu P, Shi X, et al. Hierarchically porous hydroxyapatite hybrid scaffold incorporated with reduced graphene oxide for rapid bone ingrowth and repair. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(8): 9595-9606.
103.	Li Y, Feng L, Shi X, et al. Surface coating-dependent cytotoxicity and degradation of graphene derivatives: towards the design of non-toxic, degradable nano-graphene. Small, 2014, 10(8): 1544-1554.

1. Liu M, Zeng X, Ma C, et al. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Bone Res, 2017, 5: 17014. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00694.
2. Kumawat VS, Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh S, Ghosh SB. An overview of translational research in bone graft biomaterials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2023, 34(4): 497-540.
3. Findeisen S, Gräfe N, Schwilk M, et al. Use of autologous bone graft with bioactive glass as a bone substitute in the treatment of large-sized bone defects of the femur and tibia. J Pers Med, 2023, 13(12): 1644. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121644.
4. Li G, Zhou T, Lin S, et al. Nanomaterials for craniofacial and dental tissue engineering. J Dent Res, 2017, 96(7): 725-732.
5. Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, Maleki A, de la Guardia M, et al. Carbon based nanomaterials for tissue engineering of bone: Building new bone on small black scaffolds: A review. J Adv Res, 2019, 18: 185-201.
6. Shin SR, Li YC, Jang HL, et al. Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2016, 105(Pt B): 255-274.
7. Liu S, Li S, Wang Q, et al. Effect of polycarboxylate-silane modified graphene oxide composite on the properties of cement pastes. Materials (Basel), 2022, 15(15): 5313. doi: 10.3390/ma15155313.
8. Narayan J, Bezborah K. Recent advances in the functionalization, substitutional doping and applications of graphene/graphene composite nanomaterials. RSC Adv, 2024, 14(19): 13413-13444.
9. Barba-Rosado LV, Carrascal-Hernández DC, Insuasty D, et al. Graphene oxide (GO) for the treatment of bone cancer: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2024, 14(2): 186. doi: 10.3390/nano14020186.
10. Zhou H, Chen J, Zhang X, et al. Exploring the application of graphene oxide-based nanomaterials in the repair of osteoporotic fractures. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2024, 14(6): 553. doi: 10.3390/nano14060553.
11. Gou Q, Cai X, Yan Z, et al. Highly selective Pb(Ⅱ) adsorption by DTPA-functionalized graphene oxide/carboxymethyl cellulose aerogel. Langmuir, 2024, 40(15): 8002-8014.
12. Li Y, Zhang K, Yin Y, et al. Amino-functionalized graphene oxide affects bacteria-phage interactions in aquatic environments. Water Res, 2024, 259: 121840. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121840.
13. Jaramillo-Fierro X, Cuenca G. Theoretical and experimental analysis of hydroxyl and epoxy group effects on graphene oxide properties. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2024, 14(8): 714. doi: 10.3390/nano14080714.
14. Tan QC, Jiang XS, Chen L, et al. Bioactive graphene oxide-functionalized self-expandable hydrophilic and osteogenic nanocomposite for orthopaedic applications. Mater Today Bio, 2022, 18: 100500. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100500.
15. Potbhare AK, Aziz SKT, Ayyub MM, et al. Bioinspired graphene-based metal oxide nanocomposites for photocatalytic and electrochemical performances: an updated review. Nanoscale Adv, 2024, 6(10): 2539-2568.
16. Dinescu S, Ionita M, Ignat SR, et al. Graphene oxide enhances chitosan-based 3D scaffold properties for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(20): 5077. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205077.
17. Yu P, Bao RY, Shi XJ, et al. Self-assembled high-strength hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide/chitosan composite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym, 2017, 155: 507-515.
18. Saravanan S, Vimalraj S, Anuradha D. Chitosan based thermoresponsive hydrogel containing graphene oxide for bone tissue repair. Biomed Pharmacother, 2018, 107: 908-917.
19. Li D, Nie W, Chen L, et al. Self-assembled hydroxyapatite-graphene scaffold for photothermal cancer therapy and bone regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2018, 14(12): 2003-2017.
20. Li K, Wang C, Yan J, et al. Evaluation of the osteogenesis and osseointegration of titanium alloys coated with graphene: an in vivo study. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 1843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19742-y.
21. Shariati A, Hosseini SM, Chegini Z, et al. Graphene-based materials for inhibition of wound infection and accelerating wound healing. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 158: 114184. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114184.
22. Wu M, Zou L, Jiang L, et al. Osteoinductive and antimicrobial mechanisms of graphene-based materials for enhancing bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2021, 15(11): 915-935.
23. Chen Y, Zheng Z, Zhou R, et al. Developing a strontium-releasing graphene oxide-/collagen-based organic-inorganic nanobiocomposite for large bone defect regeneration via MAPK signaling pathway. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11(17): 15986-15997.
24. Bordoni V, Reina G, Orecchioni M, et al. Stimulation of bone formation by monocyte-activator functionalized graphene oxide in vivo. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(41): 19408-19421.
25. He Y, Li Y, Chen G, et al. Concentration-dependent cellular behavior and osteogenic differentiation effect induced in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells treated with magnetic graphene oxide. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2020, 108(1): 50-60.
26. Das S, Singh S, Singh V, et al. Oxygenated functional group density on graphene oxide: Its effect on cell toxicity. Particle, 2013, 30(2): 148-157.
27. Kurapati R, Mukherjee SP, Martín C, et al. Degradation of single-layer and few-layer graphene by neutrophil myeloperoxidase. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2018, 57(36): 11722-11727.
28. Zhang W, Fang XX, Li QC, et al. Reduced graphene oxide-embedded nerve conduits loaded with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Neural Regen Res, 2023, 18(1): 200-206.
29. Ibrahim A, Klopocinska A, Horvat K, et al. Graphene-based nanocomposites: Synthesis, mechanical properties, and characterizations. Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13(17): 2869. doi: 10.3390/polym13172869.
30. Young LJ, Kinloch IA, Gong L, et al. The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: A review. Composites Science and Technology, 2012, 72(12): 1459-1476.
31. Kim HJ, Seo KJ, Kim DE. Investigation of mechanical behavior of single- and multi-layer graphene by using molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2016, 17(12): 1693-1701.
32. Eqra R, Janghorban K, Manesh HD. Effect of number of graphene layers on mechanical and dielectric properties of graphene—epoxy nanocomposites. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 2015, 44(10): 405-412.
33. Tang YF, Chen L, Duan ZH, et al. Graphene/barium titanate/polymethyl methacrylate bio-piezoelectric composites for biomedical application. Ceramics International, 2020, 46(5): 6567-6574.
34. Jing X, Xu C, Su W, et al. Photosensitive and conductive hydrogel induced innerved bone regeneration for infected bone defect repair. Adv Healthc Mater, 2023, 12(3): e2201349. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201349.
35. Zhao G, Li X, Huang M, et al. The physics and chemistry of graphene-on-surfaces. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46(15): 4417-4449.
36. Thompson BC, Murray E, Wallace GG. Graphite oxide to graphene. Biomaterials to bionics. Adv Mater, 2015, 27(46): 7563-7582.
37. Shuai CJ, Zeng ZC, Yang YW, et al. Graphene oxide assists polyvinylidene fluoride scaffold to reconstruct electrical microenvironment of bone tissue. Materials & Design, 2020, 190: 108564. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108564.
38. Ningrum DR, Hanif W, Mardhian DF, et al. In vitro biocompatibility of hydrogel polyvinyl alcohol/moringa oleifera leaf extract/graphene oxide for wound dressing. Polymers (Basel), 2023, 15(2): 468. doi: 10.3390/polym15020468.
39. Chen J, Zhang X, Cai H, et al. Osteogenic activity and antibacterial effect of zinc oxide/carboxylated graphene oxide nanocomposites: Preparation and in vitro evaluation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2016, 147: 397-407.
40. Paz E, Ballesteros Y, Forriol F, et al. Graphene and graphene oxide functionalisation with silanes for advanced dispersion and reinforcement of PMMA-based bone cements. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 104: 109946. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109946.
41. Vuppaladadium SSR, Agarwal T, Kulanthaivel S, et al. Silanization improves biocompatibility of graphene oxide. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2020, 110: 110647. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110647.
42. Sun J, Deng Y, Li J, et al. A new graphene derivative: Hydroxylated graphene with excellent biocompatibility. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(16): 10226-10233.
43. Jia Z, Shi Y, Xiong P, et al. From solution to biointerface: Graphene self-assemblies of varying lateral sizes and surface properties for biofilm control and osteodifferentiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(27): 17151-17165.
44. Liu H, Cheng J, Chen F, et al. Biomimetic and cell-mediated mineralization of hydroxyapatite by carrageenan functionalized graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6(5): 3132-3140.
45. Sharma R, Kapusetti G, Bhong SY, et al. Osteoconductive amine-functionalized graphene-poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement composite with controlled exothermic polymerization. Bioconjug Chem, 2017, 28(9): 2254-2265.
46. Padmavathy N, Jaidev LR, Bose S, et al. Oligomer-grafted graphene in a soft nanocomposite augments mechanical properties and biological activity. Materials & Design, 2017, 126: 238-249.
47. Liu X, Ma D, Tang H, et al. Polyamidoamine dendrimer and oleic acid-functionalized graphene as biocompatible and efficient gene delivery vectors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6(11): 8173-8183.
48. Dou C, Ding N, Luo F, et al. Graphene-based microRNA transfection blocks preosteoclast fusion to increase bone formation and vascularization. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2017, 5(2): 1700578. doi: 10.1002/advs.202102286.
49. Eckhart KE, Holt BD, Laurencin MG, et al. Covalent conjugation of bioactive peptides to graphene oxide for biomedical applications. Biomater Sci, 2019, 7(9): 3876-3885.
50. Li KH, Zhang ZF, Li DP, et al. Biomimetic Ultralight, Highly Porous, Shape-Adjustable, and Biocompatible 3D Graphene Minerals via Incorporation of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanosheets. Advanced Function Materials, 2018, 28(29): 1801056. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201801056.
51. Kang ES, Kim DS, Han Y, et al. Three-dimensional graphene-RGD peptide nanoisland composites that enhance the osteogenesis of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(3): 669. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030669.
52. Zhang W, Yang G, Wang X, et al. Magnetically controlled growth-factor-immobilized multilayer cell sheets for complex tissue regeneration. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(43). doi: 10.1002/adma.201703795.
53. Yao Q, Liu Y, Sun H. Heparin-dopamine functionalized graphene foam for sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2018, 12(6): 1519-1529.
54. Unnithan AR, Sasikala ARK, Park CH, et al. A unique scaffold for bone tissue engineering: An osteogenic combination of graphene oxide-hyaluronic acid-chitosan with simvastatin. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2017, 46: 182-191.
55. Sun HH, Zhang LF, Xia W, et al. Fabrication of graphene oxide-modified chitosan for controlled release of dexamethasone phosphate. Applied Physics A, 2016, 122(7): 632. doi: 10.1007/s00339-016-0029-4.
56. Weng W, Nie W, Zhou Q, et al. Controlled release of vancomycin from 3D porous graphene-based composites for dual-purpose treatment of infected bone defects. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(5): 2753-2765.
57. Patil S, Rajkuberan C, Sagadevan S. Recent biomedical advancements in graphene oxide and future perspectives. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 2023, 86: 104737. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104737.
58. Yi X, Gao H. Cell interaction with graphene microsheets: near-orthogonal cutting versus parallel attachment. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(12): 5457-5467.
59. Peruzynska M, Cendrowski K, Barylak M, et al. Comparative in vitro study of single and four layer graphene oxide nanoflakes-Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake. Toxicol In Vitro, 2017, 41: 205-213.
60. Mohammed H, Kumar A, Bekyarova E, et al. Antimicrobial mechanisms and effectiveness of graphene and graphene-Functionalized biomaterials. A scope review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8: 465. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00465.
61. Alfei S, Schito GC, Schito AM, et al. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated antibacterial oxidative therapies: Available methods to generate ROS and a novel option proposal. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(13): 7182. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137182.
62. Endale HT, Tesfaye W, Mengstie TA. ROS induced lipid peroxidation and their role in ferroptosis. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2023, 11: 1226044. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1226044.
63. Zhang W, Yan L, Li M, et al. Deciphering the underlying mechanisms of oxidation-state dependent cytotoxicity of graphene oxide on mammalian cells. Toxicol Lett, 2015, 237(2): 61-71.
64. Teixeira-Santos R, Belo S, Vieira R, et al. Graphene-based composites for biomedical applications: Surface modification for enhanced antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility. Biomolecules, 2023, 13(11): 1571. doi: 10.3390/biom13111571.
65. Anitasari S, Wu CZ, Shen YK. PCL/graphene scaffolds for the osteogenesis process. Bioengineering (Basel), 2023, 10(3): 305. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030305.
66. Liang C, Luo Y, Yang G, et al. Graphene oxide hybridized nHAC/PLGA scaffolds facilitate the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2018, 13(1): 15. doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2432-6.
67. Li XJ, Lin KL, Wang ZL. Enhanced growth and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells on Ti6Al4V alloys modified with reduced graphene oxide. Rsc Advances, 2017, 7(24): 14430-14437.
68. Newby SD, Masi T, Griffin CD, et al. Functionalized graphene nanoparticles induce human mesenchymal stem cells to express distinct extracellular matrix proteins mediating osteogenesis. Int J Nanomedicine, 2020, 15: 2501-2513.
69. Zou Y, Qazvini NT, Zane K, et al. Gelatin-derived graphene-silicate hybrid materials are biocompatible and synergistically promote BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9(19): 15922-15932.
70. Yu S, You M, Zhou K, et al. Progress of research on graphene and its derivatives in bone and cartilage repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023, 11: 1185520. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1185520.
71. Qiu JJ, Guo JS, Geng H, et al. Three-dimensional porous graphene nanosheets synthesized on the titanium surface for osteogenic differentiation of rat bone mesenchymal stem cells. Carbon, 2017, 125: 227-235.
72. Lyu H, He Z, Chan YK, et al. Hierarchical ZnO nanotube/graphene oxide nanostructures endow pure Zn implant with synergistic bactericidal activity and osteogenicity. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(42): 19377-19385.
73. Shahin M, Munir K, Wen C, et al. Magnesium-based composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets as biodegradable implant materials. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2020, 828: 154461. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154461.
74. Zhao Y, Chen JD, Zou L, et al, Facile one-step bioinspired mineralization by chitosan functionalized with graphene oxide to activate bone endogenous regeneration. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 378: 122174. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122174.
75. Oğuz ÖD, Ege D. Preparation of graphene oxide-reinforced calcium phosphate/calcium sulfate/methylcellulose-based injectable bone substitutes. MRS Communications, 2019, 9(4): 1174-1180.
76. Li J, Jiang H, Ouyang X, et al. CaCO₃/tetraethylenepentamine-graphene hollow microspheres as biocompatible bone drug carriers for controlled release. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(44): 30027-30036.
77. Tang J, Cao W, Zhang Y, et al. Properties of vaterite-containing tricalcium silicate composited graphene oxide for biomaterials. Biomed Mater, 2019, 14(4): 045004. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab0de3.
78. Dai C, Li Y, Pan W, et al. Three-dimensional high-porosity chitosan/honeycomb porous carbon/hydroxyapatite scaffold with enhanced osteoinductivity for bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2020, 6(1): 575-586.
79. Li J, Liu X, Tomaskovic-Crook E, et al. Smart graphene-cellulose paper for 2D or 3D “origami-inspired” human stem cell support and differentiation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2019, 176: 87-95.
80. Liu S, Zhou C, Mou S, et al. Biocompatible graphene oxide-collagen composite aerogel for enhanced stiffness and in situ bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 105: 110137. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110137.
81. Unagolla JM, Jayasuriya AC. Enhanced cell functions on graphene oxide incorporated 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 102: 1-11.
82. Bhusari SA, Sharma V, Bose S, et al. HDPE/UHMWPE hybrid nanocomposites with surface functionalized graphene oxide towards improved strength and cytocompatibility. J R Soc Interface, 2019, 16(150): 20180273. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0273.
83. Feng ZU, Li Y, Hao L, et al. Graphene-reinforced biodegradable resin composites for stereolithographic 3D printing of bone structure scaffolds. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2019, 2019: 9710264. doi: 10.1155/2019/9710264.
84. Liu C, Wong HM, Yeung KWK, et al. Novel electrospun polylactic acid nanocomposite fiber mats with hybrid graphene oxide and nanohydroxyapatite reinforcements having enhanced biocompatibility. Polymers (Basel), 2016, 8(8): 287. doi: 10.3390/polym8080287.
85. Qi C, Deng Y, Xu L, et al. A sericin/ graphene oxide composite scaffold as a biomimetic extracellular matrix for structural and functional repair of calvarial bone. Theranostics, 2020, 10(2): 741-756.
86. Zhang W, Chang Q, Xu L, et al. Graphene oxide-copper nanocomposite-coated porous CaP scaffold for vascularized bone regeneration via activation of Hif-1α. Adv Healthc Mater, 2016, 5(11): 1299-1309.
87. Halim A, Liu L, Ariyanti AD, et al. Low-dose suspended graphene oxide nanosheets induce antioxidant response and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via JNK-dependent FoxO1 activation. J Mater Chem B, 2019, 7(39): 5998-6009.
88. Zhao M, Dai Y, Li X, et al. Evaluation of long-term biocompatibility and osteogenic differentiation of graphene nanosheet doped calcium phosphate-chitosan AZ91D composites. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2018, 90: 365-378.
89. Yu Z, Xiao C, Huang Y, et al. Enhanced bioactivity and osteoinductivity of carboxymethyl chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite/graphene oxide nanocomposites. RSC Adv, 2018, 8(32): 17860-17877.
90. Yang X, Zhao Q, Chen Y, et al. Effects of graphene oxide and graphene oxide quantum dots on the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 2019, 47(1): 822-832.
91. Yan X, Yang W, Shao Z, et al. Graphene/single-walled carbon nanotube hybrids promoting osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by activating p38 signaling pathway. Int J Nanomedicine, 2016, 11: 5473-5484.
92. Kim HD, Kim J, Koh RH, et al. Enhanced osteogenic commitment of human mesenchymal stem cells on polyethylene glycol-based cryogel with graphene oxide substrate. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2017, 3(10): 2470-2479.
93. Noh M, Kim SH, Kim J, et al. Graphene oxide reinforced hydrogels for osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(34): 20779-20788.
94. Wu CT, Xia LG, Han PP, et al. Graphene-oxide-modified β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics stimulate in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis. Carbon, 2015, 93: 116-129.
95. Wu X, Zheng S, Ye Y, et al. Enhanced osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) by graphene via activation of PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signal circuit. Biomater Sci, 2018, 6(5): 1147-1158.
96. Vallés G, Bensiamar F, Maestro-Paramio L, et al. Influence of inflammatory conditions provided by macrophages on osteogenic ability of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2020, 11(1): 57. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-1578-1.
97. Zheng Y, Pescatore N, Gogotsi Y, et al. Rapid adsorption of proinflammatory cytokines by graphene nanoplatelets and their composites for extracorporeal detoxification. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2018, 2018: 6274072. doi: 10.1155/2018/6274072.
98. Kharlamova MV, Kramberger C. Cytotoxicity of carbon nanotubes, graphene, fullerenes, and dots. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2023, 13(9): 1458. doi: 10.3390/nano13091458.
99. Pang L, Dai C, Bi L, et al. Biosafety and antibacterial ability of graphene and graphene oxide in vitro and in vivo. Nanoscale Res Lett, 2017, 12(1): 564. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2317-0.
100. Wychowaniec JK, Litowczenko J, Tadyszak K. Fabricating versatile cell supports from nano- and micro-sized graphene oxide flakes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020, 103: 103594. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103594.
101. Wu Y, Wang F, Wang S, et al. Reduction of graphene oxide alters its cyto-compatibility towards primary and immortalized macrophages. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(30): 14637-14650.
102. Zhou K, Yu P, Shi X, et al. Hierarchically porous hydroxyapatite hybrid scaffold incorporated with reduced graphene oxide for rapid bone ingrowth and repair. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(8): 9595-9606.
103. Li Y, Feng L, Shi X, et al. Surface coating-dependent cytotoxicity and degradation of graphene derivatives: towards the design of non-toxic, degradable nano-graphene. Small, 2014, 10(8): 1544-1554.

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Latest ArticlesApplications and prospects of graphene and its derivatives in bone repair

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Format

Content