Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Supervisor：Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of ChinaSponsor：Sichuan University Editor-in-chief：Liu Lunxu Publishing period：
Monthly
ISSN：1007-4848CN：51-1492/R
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
2.
Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(2): 152-162.
3.
Sun HB, Li Y, Liu XB, et al. Early oral feeding following McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy: An open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(3): 435-442.
4.
Gottlieb-Vedi E, Kauppila JH, Malietzis G, et al. Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg, 2019, 270(6): 1005-1017.
5.
Zhang Y, Yang X, Geng D, et al. The change of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1): 97.
6.
Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: Three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg, 2017, 266(2): 232-236.
7.
Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP, Goldman DA, et al. Early quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted minimally invasive and open esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 108(3): 920-928.
1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
2. Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(2): 152-162.
3. Sun HB, Li Y, Liu XB, et al. Early oral feeding following McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy: An open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(3): 435-442.
4. Gottlieb-Vedi E, Kauppila JH, Malietzis G, et al. Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg, 2019, 270(6): 1005-1017.
5. Zhang Y, Yang X, Geng D, et al. The change of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1): 97.
6. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: Three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg, 2017, 266(2): 232-236.
7. Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP, Goldman DA, et al. Early quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted minimally invasive and open esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 108(3): 920-928.
