• 1. Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510010, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Echocardiography, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510010, P. R. China;
  • 3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510010, P. R. China;
JIAN Xuhua, Email: jianxuhua@gdph.org.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Infective endocarditis is one of the severest valvar diseases, commonly affecting the mitral valve. Currently, valve repair and replacement are the main surgical options for mitral infective endocarditis. However, the complexity of the unique nature of infective pathological changes has caused a raging debate on the most appropriate surgery for mitral infective endocarditis. With the development of surgical treatment for endocarditis, mitral valve repair could be considered as a relatively effective solution, and it has the advantages of preserving left ventricular function effectively and avoiding the inherent risks of prosthetic heart valve, but it is required on further evidence-based support. Furthermore, the controversies of the surgical timing, repair technique, and artificial materials of mitral valve repair have never stopped. By summarizing the relevant existing research results, this review aims to help clinicians make optimal treatment decisions for mitral endocarditis.