• 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of General Surgery, the People’s Hospital of Chishui, Chishui, Guizhou 564700, P. R. China;
LIU Zuojin, Email: liuzuojin66@hotmail.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD).Methods Clinical data of 29 patients receiving LPD and 27 patients receiving OPD in the department of hepatobiliary surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2016 to December 2018 were collected. Note that both LPD and OPD were performed by the same chief surgeon. Effectiveness and safety of LPD were compared with those of OPD.Results There was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, total bilirubin level, direct bilirubin level, preoperative morbidities, focus size, TNM stage and ASA grade between the LPD group and the OPD group (P>0.05). The operative time of the LPD group was significantly longer than that of the OPD group [(482±86 ) min vs. (349±73) min, P<0.01]. Patients in the LPD group had shorter postoperative anal exhaust time than that in the OPD group [(3.3±0.8) d vs. (5.3±1.0) d , P<0.05]. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay after operation, blood loss in operation, transfusion, second operation, death and postoperative complications between the LPD group and the OPD group (P>0.05).Conclusions The preliminary results of this study suggest that compared with OPD, LPD can shorten the postoperative anal exhaust time but not increase the incidence of postoperative complications and blood loss in operation. Nevertheless, this conclusion is needed to be validated by clinical studies with large sample size.

Citation: YANG Fan, ZHONG Guochao, YOU Ke, LIU Zuojin. Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective analysis. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2019, 26(6): 685-690. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.201901062 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Clinical application of oncoplastic surgery in breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Next Article

    Application effect of triple therapy of “washing, blowing, and plugging” in wound treatment after PPH operation