• 1. Department of General Surgery, Suzhou Dushuhu Public Hospital/Dushuhu Public Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Oncology, Suzhou Dushuhu Public Hospital/Dushuhu Public Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, P. R. China;
CAI Shengbin, Email: shengbin117@sina.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective The aim of this current meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selective surgery after colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute obstructive colorectal cancer.Methods The studies published from January 1, 2000 to July 31, 2018 were searched from Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang database, and VIP database. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis.Results A total of 21 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to emergency surgery, selective surgery after colonic stenting had significant lower mortality rate [OR=0.44, 95% CI was (0.26, 0.73), P<0.05], permanent stoma rate [OR=0.46, 95% CI was (0.23, 0.94), P<0.05], complication rate [OR=0.47, 95% CI was (0.35, 0.63), P<0.05], and wound infection rate [OR=0.40, 95% CI was (0.25, 0.65), P<0.05)], but had significant higher primary anastomosis rate [OR=3.30, 95% CI was (2.47, 4.41), P<0.05] and laparoscopic surgery rate [OR=12.55, 95% CI was (3.64, 43.25), P<0.05]. But there was no significant differences between the two groups as to anastomotic leak rate [OR=0.86, 95% CI was (0.48, 1.55), P>0.05].Conclusions Selective surgery after colonic stenting can be identified in a reduced incidence of mortality rate, complication rate, permanent stoma rate, and wound infection rate, and also can increase primary anastomosis rate and laparoscopic surgery rate. Thus, for acute obstructive colorectal cancer, selective surgery after colonic stenting is better than emergency surgery.

Citation: CAI Shengbin, MA Xianhua. Efficacy and safety of selective surgery after colonic stenting versus emergency surgery foracute obstructive colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2019, 26(11): 1320-1329. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.201906036 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Safety and effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Refractory recurrent metastatic parathyroid carcinoma: MDT of a case and literatures review