Objective To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on breast conserving surgery and the outcomes of treatment for women with operable breast cancer.
Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007), CENTRAL (1970 to 2007), PUBMED (1978 to March 2007), CBM (1978 to 2006), CNKI (1994 to 2007), CMCC (1994 to May 2007) and other relevant databases and journals. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NAC plus breast conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy versus BCT or mastectomy plus postoperative chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed for homogenous studies by using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10.
Results Three eligible studies involving 2 391 women were included. The median follow-up in the studies ranged from 17 to 137 months. The methodological quality of the three RCTs was high. Meta-analyses showed that NAC had no significant effect on overall survival (OS) (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.07), disease-free survival (RR 1.04, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.15) and ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (RR 1.34, 95%CI 0.84 to 2.13). Two RCTs revealed that NAC significantly increased the rate of BCT in operable breast cancer patients, but the other RCT reported similar rates of BCT in both groups. One RCT indicated that NAC did not increase the incidence of surgery-related local complications.
Conclusions NAC is safe for the treatment of women with operable breast cancer, which may increase the rate of BCT and help to evaluate chemosensitivity. There is insufficient evidence to assess the effect of NAC on conserving surgery procedure and survival rate in operable BCT patients. More large-scale RCTs are needed to define further the role of NAC in the treatment of operable breast cancer patients.
Citation： LUO Jing,LI Youping,WU Taixiang,LV Qing. Breast Conserving Therapy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Operable Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2008, 08(7): 551-557. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20080126 Copy