• 1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China2. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To assess atomoxetine and methylphenidate therapy for attention- deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) .
Methods  We electronically searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), PubMed (1970 to 2008), MEDLINE (1971 to 2008), EMbase (1971 to 2008), Medscape (1990 to 2008), CBM (1978 to 2008), and NRR (1950 to 2008). We also hand-searched some published and unpublished references. Two independent reviewers extracted data. Quality was assessed by the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.0. Meta-analysis was conducted by The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 software.
Results  We finally identified 3 randomized controlled trials that were relevant to the study. Treatment response (reducing ADHD-RS Inattention subscale score) was significantly greater for patients in the methylphenidate group than in the atomoxetine group with WMD= – 1.79 and 95%CI – 2.22 to 1.35 (P lt;0.000 01). There was no statistical difference in other outcome measures between two groups (P gt;0.05).
Conclusions  The effectiveness and tolerance of methylphenidate and atomoxetine are similar in treatment of ADHD. Further large randomized, double blind, placebocontrolled trials with end-point outcome measures in long-term safety and efficacy are needed.

Citation: XV Peiru,FANG Zhimin. A Meta-analyses Comparing Atomoxetine with Methylphenidate for Treatement of Children with Attention- Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2009, 09(3): 346-349. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20090065 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Carnitine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Asthenozoospermia: A Systematic Review
  • Next Article

    Dorzolamide/Timolol Combination Versus Latanoprost in the Treatment of Open-angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review