• 1. Evidence-based Medicine Center, Basic Medical Sciences School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;2. Institute of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To assess the efficacy and safety of Etanercept for Ankylosing spondylitis.
Methods  We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4. 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2008), EMBASE (1974 to September 2008), CBM (1978 to 2008), CNKI (1994 to 2008), VIP (1989 to 2008), and Wanfang (1999 to 2008). The quality of included studies was critically evaluated. Data analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software.
Results  Seven randomized controlled trials with total of 949 patients met the included criteria. The metaanalysis showed the effective rate of ASAS 20 or ASAS 50 receiving Etanercept was significantly higher than in patients receiving placebo, while no significant differences were noted between the Etanercept and placebo group in other indices. There was no statistical significance among different dosages. Patient Injection-site reaction rate for Etanercept was higher than that for placebo. No significant differences were observed in other adverse effects.
Conclusions  Etanercept is safe and effective for patients with Ankylosing spondylitis, however, some trials included in the review were of poor quality, so we needed the multi-center, large-scale randomized controlled trials of higher quality and the same course of treatment to confirm this.

Citation: LI Shaohong,MA Bin,TAN Jiying,YANG Kehu. Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept for Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2009, 09(4): 423-429. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20090080 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning in Clinical Students: A Meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    A Systematic Review of Losartan versus Valsartan for Essential Hypertension Associated with Hyperuricemia