• 1. West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041, China;2. The Chinese Cochrane Centre / Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;3. West China School of Clinical Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;4. Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To compare the national essential medicines list (EML) and national essential insurance medicine list (EIML) of China with that of the WHO, so as to provide reasonable evidence for the adjustment of new EML and EIML of China.
Methods  The similarities and differences in the selection, updating, categories, subcategories and the amounts of medicines in the EML and EIML of China and the WHO EML were compared and analyzed.
Results  There are some differences among the three lists in selecting principles, updating of medicines .The latest version of WHO EML (version in 2007) has 27 categories, including 340 medicines; China EML (version in 2004) has 23 categories and 773 western medicines, containing 23 categories and 225 (66.17%) similar medicines of WHO EML, which accounts for 29.11% of EML of China. China EIML (version in 2005) has 23 categories and 1 031 western medicines, containing 22 categories and 227 (66.76%) of WHO EML, which accounts for 22.02% of EIML of China. China EIML was developed based on China EML. There is little difference in selecting, updating, categories of medicines.
Conclusion  The difference was obviously found in medicine selection, updating and categories between China EML, EIML and WHO EML. We suggested that our national EML and EIML should be more reasonably selected and updated base on the principals of WHO EML.

Citation: ZHANG Chuan,WANG Li,YUAN Qiang,LI Youping,ZHANG Lingli. A Comparative Study among the Essential Medicine List, National Insurance Medicine List of China, and National Essential Medicine List of the WHO. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2009, 09(7): 765-773. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20090134 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Evidence-Based Evaluation of National Essential Medicine Lists in Twenty-five Countries
  • Next Article

    Intensive Glucose Control Compared with Standard Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systemic Review