Methods of Systematic Review of Health Policy Researches_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

JIA Liying ¹ , YUAN Beibei ¹ , WANG Jian ¹ , YU Baorong ¹ , GAO Jun ² ,  MENG Qingyue ¹

1. Centre for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University; Key Lab for Health Economics and Policy Research, Ministry of Health,Jinan 250012, China;2. Regional Office for the Western Pacific (WHO), Manila, Philippines;

Corresponding author：

MENG Qingyue, Email: qmeng@sdu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Systematic review; Health policy; Key technical; Quality assessment; Integrated approaches

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20090184

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

It is the key for evidence-base decision to gain the high quality evidences. As a valuable method,systematic review has been widely used in medical areas with the improvement of the method, but it cannot be useddirectly in health policy field, because the characters of the health policy such as research topics, methods and objectives.The Center for Health Management and Policy of Shandong University has made some researches which focus on themethod under the support from the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (WHO) from 2006. We haveexplored the two-stage systematic review method of health policy researches and applied it into reality. The purpose of thisarticle is to introduce the key technical of this method, which include quality assessment of the literatures, analysis andintegrated approaches. We also put forward the work which needs to be continued in the future.

Citation： JIA Liying,YUAN Beibei,WANG Jian,YU Baorong,GAO Jun,MENG Qingyue. Methods of Systematic Review of Health Policy Researches. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2009, 09(10): 1037-1043. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20090184 Copy

1.	Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1997, 126(5): 376-380.
2.	李珏, 方平, 胡德华. 循证医学系统综述来源文献的分析研究. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2004, 7(13): 57-62.
3.	Light RJ, Pillemer DB. Organizing a reviewing strategy. In: Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1984, 13-31.
4.	威廉?N?邓恩. 公共政策分析导论. 第2版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2002.
5.	Cabinet Office. Modernising Government White Paper Cm 4310 London: The Stationery Office. 1999.
6.	Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/.
7.	Ekman B. Community-based health insurance in low-income countries: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Policy and Planning, 2004, 19(5): 249-270.
8.	DATA COLLECTION CHECKLIST. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Available from: http:// www.epoc.cochrane.org/en/handsearchers.html.
9.	Modified from criteria developed by Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) (http://www.phru.nhs.uk/Doc_Links/Qualitative% 20Appraisal%20Tool.pdf) and BMJ (http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/ authors/checklists-forms/qualitative-research).
10.	Muri Gray, 唐金陵. 循证医学?循证医疗卫生决策. 第1版. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社. 2004.
11.	Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park (CA). 1988.
12.	袁蓓蓓, 贾莉英, 王健, 等, 扩大脆弱人群健康保险覆盖率的策略: 描述性系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2008, 8(9): 744-756.
13.	贾莉英, 袁蓓蓓, 袁莎莎, 等. 不同国家健康保障制度筹资机制变革因素的描述性系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2009, 9(3): 247-256.

1. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1997, 126(5): 376-380.
2. 李珏, 方平, 胡德华. 循证医学系统综述来源文献的分析研究. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2004, 7(13): 57-62.
3. Light RJ, Pillemer DB. Organizing a reviewing strategy. In: Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1984, 13-31.
4. 威廉?N?邓恩. 公共政策分析导论. 第2版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2002.
5. Cabinet Office. Modernising Government White Paper Cm 4310 London: The Stationery Office. 1999.
6. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/.
7. Ekman B. Community-based health insurance in low-income countries: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Policy and Planning, 2004, 19(5): 249-270.
8. DATA COLLECTION CHECKLIST. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Available from: http:// www.epoc.cochrane.org/en/handsearchers.html.
9. Modified from criteria developed by Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) (http://www.phru.nhs.uk/Doc_Links/Qualitative% 20Appraisal%20Tool.pdf) and BMJ (http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/ authors/checklists-forms/qualitative-research).
10. Muri Gray, 唐金陵. 循证医学?循证医疗卫生决策. 第1版. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社. 2004.
11. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park (CA). 1988.
12. 袁蓓蓓, 贾莉英, 王健, 等, 扩大脆弱人群健康保险覆盖率的策略: 描述性系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2008, 8(9): 744-756.
13. 贾莉英, 袁蓓蓓, 袁莎莎, 等. 不同国家健康保障制度筹资机制变革因素的描述性系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志, 2009, 9(3): 247-256.

Next Article
Effectiveness Evaluation of Intervention Modes among Street-based Female Sex Worksin Chongqing

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Methods of Systematic Review of Health Policy Researches

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Next Article

Format

Content