• School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China;
JU Lirong, Email: juli56@ccmu.edu.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To investigate the expression of COX-2 in human cervical cancer and explore their relationship between the COX-2 expression and the clinicopathologic characteristic of cervical cancer.
Methods  The published studies were searched in the CBMdisc (1979 to 2009), CNKI (1979 to 2009), VIP (1989 to 2009) and WANFANG Database (1982 to 2009), and other relevant journals were also hand searched, to identify all the relevant case-control trials. The quality of the included studies was assessed. The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.10 was used to test the heterogeneity, overall effect and publication bias of the combined studies.
Results  A total of 9 studies were recruited. As for the positive rate of COX-2 expression, significant differences was tested between cervical cancer vs. normal cervical tissues, lymph node metastasi vs. non-lymph node metastasi, clinical stages I-II vs. clinical stages III-IV, cell differentiation G1 vs. cell differentiation G2-G3 and cervical squamous cell carcinoma vs. adenocarcinoma with OR (95%CI) at 28.03 (9.53 to 82.50), 5.16 (3.36 to 7.93), 0.53 (0.33 to 0.84), 3.11 (1.86 to 5.22) and 5.00 (2.68 to 9.35) respectively.
Conclusions  According to the domestic evidence, higher COX-2 expression might be associated with cervical cancer. However, more high quality case-control studies are expected for further study.

Citation: XU Lina,LIU Fen,YANG Xinghua,JU Lirong. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 Expression and the Clinicopathologic Characteristic of Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Case-control Studies. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2010, 10(3): 346-351. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20100407 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy of Intravertebral Analgesia for External Cephalic Version: A Systematic Review
  • Next Article

    Mental Intervention for Cancer Patients with Depression: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials