• 1. Department of Cardiology, the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;2. Evidence-Based Medicine Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;3. The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
BAI Feng, Email: baifeng@medmail.com.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of nicorandil injection for preventing slow-flow/ no-reflow phenomenon after coronary stent implantation.
Methods  We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 2, 2009), PubMed, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang database, etc. from their inception to April 2009. Some relevant journals were handsearched as well. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of included studies and extracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.0 software.
Results  Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 630 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that intracoronary and intravenous nicorandil could reduce the incidence of no-reflow/ low-flow, reduce Corrected TIMI Frame Count (CTFC), and improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Intravenous nicorandil could reduce the incidence of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), pericardial effusion, heart failure, but couldn’t reduce the incidence of death and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) death.
Conclusion  Evidence shows that intracoronary nicorandil could prevent no-reflow/ slow-flow, reduce CTFC, improve LVEF, and reduce adverse reaction in patients after coronary stent implantation. However, there is a moderate possibility of selection bias, performance bias and publication bias in this review because of the small number of the included studies, which weakens the strength of the evidence of our results. More large sample size, high-quality RCTs are needed.

Citation: ZHANG Xiaowei,MA Bin,YANG Kehu,ZHANG Yulong,BAI Feng. Safety and Effectiveness of Nicorandil for Preventing No-Reflow: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2010, 10(5): 564-569. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20100450 Copy

  • Previous Article

    DDD versus AAI Pacemakers for Sick Sinus Syndrome: A Systematic Review
  • Next Article

    Effects of Recombinant Human Brain Natriuretic Peptide on Chinese Patients with Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis