• 1. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;2. College of Stomatology of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000,China;3. The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000,China;
MA Bin, Email: kitty_mab@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To assess the anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine for irreversible pulpitis.
Methods  We electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), CNKI, VIP and CBM. The search was updated to December 2009. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were indentified about articaine and lidocaine for irreversible pulpitis. Study selection and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews. And RevMan5.0 was applied for statistical analysis in success rate.
Results  Nine trials involving 985 pulpitis patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated that, both the anesthetic success rate (RR=1.33, 95%CI 1.23 to1.44) and maxillary anesthetic success rate (RR=1.65, 95%CI 1.38 to 1.98) of articaine were superior to that of lidocaine, but there was no statistical significance in mandibular anesthetic success rate between two groups (RR=1.28, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.69).
Conclusion  The current evidence shows that articaine is superior to lidocaine in anesthetic efficacy, and is good at maxillary anesthesia.

Citation: XIAO Jiaoling,LI Yali,MA Bin,PENG Hui,SHI Qiongling,YU Zhanhai. Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine Versus Lidocaine for Irreversible Pulpitis: A Meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2010, 10(9): 1058-1062. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20100545 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Correlation between TNF-α Promoter–308A/G Polymorphism and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Chinese Populations: A Meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Surgical Management for Chinese Children Urethral Injury: A Systematic Review