1. |
2 Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A,
et al . A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet , 2009, 373: 774-779.
|
2. |
Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990.
|
3. |
Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al . An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club , 2006, 144(1): A8-9.
|
4. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1170-1173.
|
5. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 924-926.
|
6. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . What is ‘‘quality of evidence’’ and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ , 2008, 336: 995-998.
|
7. |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al . Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1049-1051.
|
8. |
Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al . Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ , 2008, 336: 1106-1110.
|
9. |
Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al . Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ , 2008, 337: a744.
|
10. |
Brozek J, Oxman A, Sch€unemann HJ. GRADEpro. [Computer program].Version 3.2 for Windows. Available at http://mcmaster.flintbox.com/technology.asp?Page53993 and http://www.cc-ims.net/revman/gradepro. Accessed October 21, 2010.
|
11. |
Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, et al . GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation; 2010.
|
12. |
Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users’ guides to the medical literature.I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA , 1993, 270: 2093-2095.
|
13. |
Akl EA, Maroun N, Guyatt G, et al . Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol , 2007, 60: 1298-1305.
|
14. |
GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res , 2005, 5: 25.
|
15. |
Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, et al . User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol , 2010, 63: 607-619.
|
16. |
Rosenbaum S, Glenton C, Oxman A. Evaluation of summary of findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol , 2009.
|
17. |
Schunemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst , 2006, 4: 13.
|
18. |
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0. [www.cochrane-handbook.org].
|
19. |
Schünemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst , 2006, 4: 21.
|