• 1. West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;2. Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;3. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
CHEN Jin, Email: ebm_chenjin@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To investigate the information literacy status of medical students, so as to provide references for further developing information literacy education.
Methods  A total of 764 medical undergraduates and postgraduates in Sichuan University were investigated by using “information literacy questionnaire”.
Results  A total of 744 feedbacks among 764 distributed questionnaires were qualified, accounting for 97.4%. Among then, 37.2% students could easily tell the key words for required information, 26.1% students could make a plan before searching information, 25.5% students could choose appropriate databases for searching, 14.7% students could critically appraise the information, and only 12.4% students had received systematic trainings on intellectual property rights and copyrights.
Conclusion  Most students of West China School of Medicine of Sichuan University possess good information consciousness, but their critical appraisal for information and information morality need to be improved further.

Citation: CHEN Yanling,CHEN Haining,XU Feilong,CHEN Jie,CHEN Jin,ZHENG Huixian,LI Youping,CHEN Bin,WAN Xiaoli,LIN Yuan. Medical Education Model with Core Competency as Guide, Evidence-Based Medicine as Carrier and Lifelong Learning as Purpose (3): Current Status of Information Literacy on Medical Students. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2011, 11(7): 763-767. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20110131 Copy

  • Previous Article

    A Study on Risk Evaluation Indicator System and Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Intrauterine Device
  • Next Article

    Interferon-γ Release Assays Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis