• 1. Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100034, China; 2. Department of Statistics, the First Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100034, China;
DING Wenhui, Email: dwh_rd@126.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective   To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of ibutilide versus amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
Methods   An electronic search in databases including PubMed, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP Database, and The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2011), published from January 1994 to January 2011,was conducted to include both English and Chinese randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about ibutilide versus amiodarone in treating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Two reviewers independently screened the studies according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, extracted the data, assessed the methodological quality, and then performed Meta-analysis by using RevMan 5.0 software.
Results   Eight RCTs involving 506 patients were finally included. The results of Meta-analysis showed: a) The total effective rate of alleviating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the ibutilide group was superior to that of the amiodarone group (OR=2.27, 95%CI 1.19 to 4.33, P=0.01); b) Four RCTs showed that ibutilide was similar to amiodarone for alleviating atrial fibrillation (OR=1.61, 95%CI 0.96 to 2.71, P=0.07), but the former was superior to the latter for alleviating atrial flutter (OR=8.97, 95%CI 4.51 to 17.84, P lt;0.000 01); c) Five RCTs showed that ibulitide took shorter time to alleviate atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter compared with amiodarone (WMD= –126.55 min, 95%CI –202.35 to –50.76, P=0.001); d) Four RCTs showed that the total adverse effect rates in the two groups had no significant difference (OR=1.13, 95%CI 0.37 to 3.43, P=0.83), but there were more cardiovascular side-effects in the ibutilide group (OR=2.36, 95%CI 1.40 to 4.01, P=0.001).
Conclusion   Compared with amiodarone, ibutilide has a higher total effective rate in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, and it obviously takes shorter time to alleviate atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, but there is no significant difference in the cardioversion rate of atrial fibrillation between them. There is no significant difference in total side-effect rates between the two groups, but the cardiovascular adverse reaction in the ibutilide group is significantly higher than that of the amiodarone group. Because of the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, this conclusion has to be further proved by more high-quality RCTs.

Citation: DONG Xiao ,ZHU Sainan,DING Wenhui. Effectiveness and Safety of Ibutilide versus Amiodarone in Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: A Meta-Analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2012, 12(2): 194-200. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20120032 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Next Article

    Effectiveness and Safety of Levofloxacin for Multidrug Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review