A brief introduction of scoping review_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

BIAN Wei ¹ , CHEN Hui ² , SONG Guomin ³ , JIN Yinghui ^4,6 , WAN Lijun ¹ , TAN Mingqiong ¹ , ZENG Xiantao ⁶ ,  TIAN Xu ²

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Southwest Hospital affiliated to the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, P.R.China;
2. Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Chongqing, 400030, P.R.China;
3. Department of Nursing, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, 300211, P.R.China;
4. School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300193, P.R.China;
5. Evidence-based Nursing Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300193, P.R.China;
6. Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University; Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Wuhan University; Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

TIAN Xu, Email: yxtx880919@hotmail.com

Keywords：

Informed-evidence decision-making; Evidence synthesis; Policy making; Scoping review

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201608004

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Informed-evidence decision-making (IEDM) has emerged as the predominant principle of providing guidance for policy-making and practice, however, the best available evidences requisite of performing successfully IEDM. Different forms of evidence and different kinds of review questions call for the development of new approaches that are designed to more effectively and rigorously identify and synthesize the evidence. Fourteen methods of reviewing literature have been recently used to identify and synthesize evidence, of which scoping reviews is increasing popular. This article introduces aspects such as background, purpose and methodological frame work and explains the process of it with an example so that facilitating the dissemination and utilization of scoping review in China.

Citation： BIAN Wei, CHEN Hui, SONG Guomin, JIN Yinghui, WAN Lijun, TAN Mingqiong, ZENG Xiantao, TIAN Xu. A brief introduction of scoping review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2017, 17(4): 488-493. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201608004 Copy

1.	帅婷, 田旭, 王新田, 等. 冲突性 Meta 分析评价方法: Jadad 法则简介. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016, 16(4): 492-496.
2.	罗杰, 冷卫东. 系统评价/Meta分析理论与实践. 北京: 军事医学科学出版社, 2013.
3.	曾宪涛, 田国祥, 张超, 等. Meta 分析系列之十五: Meta 分析的进展与思考. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2013, 5(6): 561-563.
4.	Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J, 2009, 26(2): 91-108.
5.	李幼平, 刘雪梅. 系统评价的起源、发展和作用. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(1): 2-6.
6.	Mays N, Roberts E, Popay J. Synthesizing research evidence in studying the organization and delivery of health services: research methods. London: Routledge, 188-219.
7.	Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci, 2010, 5(1): 69.
8.	Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud, 2009, 46(10): 1386-1400.
9.	Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol, 2005, 8(1): 19-32.
10.	Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods, 2014, 5(4): 371-385.
11.	Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, et al. Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel), 2016, 4(3): E36.
12.	Jowsey T, Yen L, W PM. Time spent on health related activities associated with chronic illness: a scoping literature review. BMC Public Health, 2012, 12(1): 1044.
13.	Aspinall PJ, Jacobson B, Castillo-Salgado C. Establishing and sustaining health observatories serving urbanized populations around the world: scoping study and survey. Eur J Public Health, 2016, 26(4): 681-686.
14.	Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, et al. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst, 2008, 6(1): 7.
15.	Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J, 2009, 26(2): 91-108.
16.	Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2013, 13(1): 48.
17.	Brien SE, Lorenzetti DL, Lewis S, et al. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci, 2010, 5(1): 2.
18.	DiCenso A, Martin-Misener R, Bryant-Lukosius D, et al. Advanced practice nursing in Canada: overview of a decision support synthesis. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont), 2010, 2010(sp): 15-34.
19.	Campbell Collaboration. What is a Systematic Review? 2013. Available at: .
20.	Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: .
21.	Murray AD, Daines L, Archibald D, et al. The relationships between golf and health: a scoping review. Br J Sports Med, 2017, 51(1): 12-19.

1. 帅婷, 田旭, 王新田, 等. 冲突性 Meta 分析评价方法: Jadad 法则简介. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016, 16(4): 492-496.
2. 罗杰, 冷卫东. 系统评价/Meta分析理论与实践. 北京: 军事医学科学出版社, 2013.
3. 曾宪涛, 田国祥, 张超, 等. Meta 分析系列之十五: Meta 分析的进展与思考. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2013, 5(6): 561-563.
4. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J, 2009, 26(2): 91-108.
5. 李幼平, 刘雪梅. 系统评价的起源、发展和作用. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(1): 2-6.
6. Mays N, Roberts E, Popay J. Synthesizing research evidence in studying the organization and delivery of health services: research methods. London: Routledge, 188-219.
7. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci, 2010, 5(1): 69.
8. Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud, 2009, 46(10): 1386-1400.
9. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol, 2005, 8(1): 19-32.
10. Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods, 2014, 5(4): 371-385.
11. Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, et al. Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel), 2016, 4(3): E36.
12. Jowsey T, Yen L, W PM. Time spent on health related activities associated with chronic illness: a scoping literature review. BMC Public Health, 2012, 12(1): 1044.
13. Aspinall PJ, Jacobson B, Castillo-Salgado C. Establishing and sustaining health observatories serving urbanized populations around the world: scoping study and survey. Eur J Public Health, 2016, 26(4): 681-686.
14. Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, et al. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst, 2008, 6(1): 7.
15. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J, 2009, 26(2): 91-108.
16. Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2013, 13(1): 48.
17. Brien SE, Lorenzetti DL, Lewis S, et al. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci, 2010, 5(1): 2.
18. DiCenso A, Martin-Misener R, Bryant-Lukosius D, et al. Advanced practice nursing in Canada: overview of a decision support synthesis. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont), 2010, 2010(sp): 15-34.
19. Campbell Collaboration. What is a Systematic Review? 2013. Available at: .
20. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: .
21. Murray AD, Daines L, Archibald D, et al. The relationships between golf and health: a scoping review. Br J Sports Med, 2017, 51(1): 12-19.

Previous Article
The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement
Next Article
Statistical approaches for analyzing data from N-of-1 trials

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

A brief introduction of scoping review

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content