Patients’ satisfaction of implant supported overdentures versus conventional dentures: a systematic review_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

YAN Qi ^1,2 , HUA Fang ^1,3 , SU Meiying ^1,2 , LIU Shiyao ⁴ ,  SHI Bin ^1,2

1. Hubei-MOST KLOS & KLOBM, School & Hostpital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430010, P.R.China;
2. Department of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430010, P.R.China;
3. Cochrane Oral Health, Division of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom;
4. Nanfang Hostpital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

SHI Bin, Email: shibin_dentist@whu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Implant-supported; Overlay; Complete denture; Patient satisfaction; Mandibular edeutulous; Randomized controlled trial; Meta-analysis

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201709016

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

ObjectivesTo systematically review the patients’ satisfaction of implant supported mandibular dentures and conventional dentures.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on patients’ satisfaction of implant supported mandibular dentures (IODs) and conventional dentures (CDs) from inception to November 31^st, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsSeven randomized-controlled trials were identified. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with CDs group, IODs group had a relatively higher level of patients’ satisfaction (SMD=1.11, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.43, P<0.001) and oral health quality of life (MD=–12.41, 95%CI –18.96 to –5.86,P<0.001).ConclusionsThe current evidence suggests that IODs may be a better choice for mandibular edentulous patients than CDs. Due to the limitations of the quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusions still require larger sample and high quality research to verify.

Citation： YAN Qi, HUA Fang, SU Meiying, LIU Shiyao, SHI Bin. Patients’ satisfaction of implant supported overdentures versus conventional dentures: a systematic review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2018, 18(8): 858-864. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201709016 Copy

1.	Petersen PE, Yamamoto T. Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO global oral health programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2005, 33(2): 81-92.
2.	刘洪臣. 种植修复对传统修复观念的影响. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2016, 51(1): 3-6.
3.	Banu RF, Veeravalli PT, Kumar VA. Comparative evaluation of changes in brain activity and cognitive function of edentulous patients, with dentures and two-implant supported mandibular overdenture-pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18(3): 580-587.
4.	Pan YH, Lin TM, Liang CH. Comparison of patient’s satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures and complete dentures. Biomed J, 2014, 37(3): 156-162.
5.	Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. montreal, quebec, may 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002, 17(4): 601-602.
6.	Hua F, Xie H, Worthington HV, et al. Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016, (10): CD008367.
7.	Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, et al. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont, 2003, 16(2): 117-122.
8.	Kimoto K, Garrett NR. Effect of mandibular ridge height on patients’ perceptions with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005, 20(5): 762-768.
9.	Awad MA, Morais JA, Wollin S, et al. Implant overdentures and nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res, 2012, 91(1): 39-46.
10.	Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van’T HM, et al. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5-years’ follow-up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1999, 10(3): 238-244.
11.	Muller F, Duvernay E, Loup A, et al. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res, 2013, 92(12 Suppl): 154S-160S.
12.	Jabbour Z, Emami E, de Grandmont P, et al. Is oral health-related quality of life stable following rehabilitation with mandibular two-implant overdentures? Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(10): 1205-1209.
13.	Boerrigter EM, Geertman ME, Van Oort RP, et al. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. a comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants--a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1995, 33(5): 282-288.
14.	Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, et al. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont, 2003, 16(5): 467-473.
15.	Gjengedal H, Berg E, Gronningsaeter AG, et al. The influence of relining or implant retaining existing mandibular dentures on health-related quality of life: a 2-year randomized study of dissatisfied edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont, 2013, 26(1): 68-78.
16.	Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompre PH, et al. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(6): 533-544.
17.	Yunus N, Masood M, Saub R, et al. Impact of mandibular implant prostheses on the oral health-related quality of life in partially and completely edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(7): 904-909.
18.	Heydecke G, Thomason JM, Awad MA, et al. Do mandibular implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures meet the expectations of edentulous patients? Quintessence Int, 2008, 39(10): 803-809.
19.	Allen F, Mcmillan A. Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002, 13(3): 320-326.
20.	Khoo HD, Chai J, Chow TW. Prosthetic outcome, patient complaints, and nutritional effects on elderly patients with magnet-retained, implant-supported overdentures-a 1-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013, 28(5): 1278-1312.

1. Petersen PE, Yamamoto T. Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO global oral health programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2005, 33(2): 81-92.
2. 刘洪臣. 种植修复对传统修复观念的影响. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2016, 51(1): 3-6.
3. Banu RF, Veeravalli PT, Kumar VA. Comparative evaluation of changes in brain activity and cognitive function of edentulous patients, with dentures and two-implant supported mandibular overdenture-pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18(3): 580-587.
4. Pan YH, Lin TM, Liang CH. Comparison of patient’s satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures and complete dentures. Biomed J, 2014, 37(3): 156-162.
5. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. montreal, quebec, may 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002, 17(4): 601-602.
6. Hua F, Xie H, Worthington HV, et al. Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016, (10): CD008367.
7. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, et al. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont, 2003, 16(2): 117-122.
8. Kimoto K, Garrett NR. Effect of mandibular ridge height on patients’ perceptions with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005, 20(5): 762-768.
9. Awad MA, Morais JA, Wollin S, et al. Implant overdentures and nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res, 2012, 91(1): 39-46.
10. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van’T HM, et al. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5-years’ follow-up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1999, 10(3): 238-244.
11. Muller F, Duvernay E, Loup A, et al. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res, 2013, 92(12 Suppl): 154S-160S.
12. Jabbour Z, Emami E, de Grandmont P, et al. Is oral health-related quality of life stable following rehabilitation with mandibular two-implant overdentures? Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(10): 1205-1209.
13. Boerrigter EM, Geertman ME, Van Oort RP, et al. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. a comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants--a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1995, 33(5): 282-288.
14. Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, et al. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont, 2003, 16(5): 467-473.
15. Gjengedal H, Berg E, Gronningsaeter AG, et al. The influence of relining or implant retaining existing mandibular dentures on health-related quality of life: a 2-year randomized study of dissatisfied edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont, 2013, 26(1): 68-78.
16. Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompre PH, et al. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(6): 533-544.
17. Yunus N, Masood M, Saub R, et al. Impact of mandibular implant prostheses on the oral health-related quality of life in partially and completely edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(7): 904-909.
18. Heydecke G, Thomason JM, Awad MA, et al. Do mandibular implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures meet the expectations of edentulous patients? Quintessence Int, 2008, 39(10): 803-809.
19. Allen F, Mcmillan A. Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002, 13(3): 320-326.
20. Khoo HD, Chai J, Chow TW. Prosthetic outcome, patient complaints, and nutritional effects on elderly patients with magnet-retained, implant-supported overdentures-a 1-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013, 28(5): 1278-1312.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Patients’ satisfaction of implant supported overdentures versus conventional dentures: a systematic review

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content