SU Shi 1 , ZHAI Zhonghui 2 , LIU Hua 3
  • 1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi’an, 710061, P.R.China;
  • 2. Library of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710061, P.R.China;
  • 3. Xi'an Medical University, Xi’an, 710021, P.R.China;
ZHAI Zhonghui, Email: zhaizh@mail.lib.xjtu.edu.cn
Systematic review; Retrieval; Sensitivity; Accuracy; One-stop search
10.7507/1672-2531.201709070
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables References Cited by

The sensitivity and accuracy of the retrieval results directly affect the results in the systematic review of biomedical researchers. However, different retrieval methods and retrieval tools lead to different retrieval results. In this paper, we first evaluate the effects of Boolean logic retrieval, hierarchical retrieval, topic retrieval and full-text retrieval on the retrieval results of systematic reviews. We then introduce the application of one-stop search tool (Google Scholar and resource discovery system) in systematic review, and compare the effects of different one-stop search tools.

Citation： SU Shi, ZHAI Zhonghui, LIU Hua. Application and effect of one-stop search tool in systematic review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2018, 18(5): 506-510. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201709070 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Quality assessment of meta-analyses published on The Chinese Journal of Nursing

  • Next Article

    Drafting process of “Clinical practice guideline on traditional Chinese medicine alone or combined with antibiotics for patients with acute upper respiratory infection in children”