Evidence-based social science: origin, condition and prospect_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

BAI Zhenggang ¹ , CHI Iris ² , YANG Kehu ³ , WU Sijie ¹ ,  ZHANG Shu ¹ ,  LI Youping ⁴

1. School of Public Affairs, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, P.R.China;
2. Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA90089-0411, USA;
3. Evidence-based Social Science Research Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, P.R.China;
4. Chinese Cochrane Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;

Corresponding author：

ZHANG Shu, Email: z_shu6@163.com; LI Youping, Email: yzmylab@hotmail.com

Keywords：

Evidence-based; Social science; Management; Education; Social work

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201807123

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Since the appearance of the concept of evidence-based medicine in 1992, its advanced conception and scientific method has been widely applied in various social science fields, and several sub-disciplines were formed such as evidence-based management, evidence-based education, and evidence-based social work and so on. However, there has been no studies to review its history and condition until now. The purpose of this study was to introduce the evidence-based social science in terms of its origin, development conditions, challenges and strategies. We hope it can serve as reference for research and policy makings in the fields of social science in China.

Citation： BAI Zhenggang, CHI Iris, YANG Kehu, WU Sijie, ZHANG Shu, LI Youping. Evidence-based social science: origin, condition and prospect. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2018, 18(10): 1118-1121. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201807123 Copy

1.	AMES. From concept to implementation: the challenges facing evidence-based social work. Faculty Research & Insights: A Series Featuring CUSSW Faculty Research, 2004.
2.	杨文登. 循证实践: 一种新的实践形态?. 自然辩证法研究, 2010, 26(4): 106-110.
3.	赵坤, 郭君钰, 杨光, 等. Campbell 图书馆简介. 中国循证医学杂志, 2015, 15(1): 120-124.
4.	Available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/about-us/what-is-social-science/social-science-disciplines/.
5.	Available at: http://www.ccetchina.org/view/234.
6.	陈大国. 循证矫正的原则、方法与流程. 湖北警官学院学报, 2014, 3(3): 159-161.
7.	杨云峰. 循证矫正本土化研究-以江苏省监狱系统为例. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2014.
8.	周勇. 循证矫正若干问题探究. 中国司法, 2014, (1): 75-80.
9.	Hargreaves DH. In defence of research for evidence‐based teaching: a rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. Br Educ Res J, 1997, 23(4): 405-419.
10.	梁有道. 中国循证教育的研究现状和策略. 南京: 第一届循证社会工作研究与证据合成国际研讨会会议壁报, 2017.
11.	Fischer JCC. The effectiveness of social casework. New York: Thomas Publisher, 1976.
12.	何雪松. 证据为本的实践的兴起及其对中国社会工作发展的启示. 华东理工大学学报 (社会科学版), 2004, 19(1): 13-18.
13.	拜争刚, 吴淑婷, 齐铱. 循证理念和方法在中国社会工作领域的应用现状分析. 社会建设, 2017, 4(4): 57-66.
14.	齐铱. 循证理念和方法: 中国社会工作科学化和专业化发展的助推器. 社会建设, 2017, 4(4): 28-29.
15.	Rousseau DM. Is there such a thing as " evidence-based management”. Acad Manage Rev, 2006, 31(3): 256-269.
16.	周志忍, 李乐. 循证决策: 国际实践、理论渊源与学术定位. 中国行政管理, 2013, 16(12): 23-27, 43.
17.	游洁, 拜争刚, 黄鹏, 等. 循证实践理念和方法在中国管理领域研究现状可视化分析. 河南大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 36(2): 91-97.
18.	李思源, 季婷, 拜争刚, 等. 循证实践在国内社会科学领域的研究现状分析. 中国社会医学杂志, 2017, 34(6): 223-226.
19.	Chang J, Guan Z, Chi I, et al. Evidence-based practice in the health and social services in China: developments, strategies, and challenges. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2014, 12(1): 17-24.
20.	Available at: http://www.evidencecollaborative.org/.
21.	杨克虎, 李秀霞, 拜争刚. 循证社会科学研究方法-系统评价与 Meta 分析. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 2018.

1. AMES. From concept to implementation: the challenges facing evidence-based social work. Faculty Research & Insights: A Series Featuring CUSSW Faculty Research, 2004.
2. 杨文登. 循证实践: 一种新的实践形态?. 自然辩证法研究, 2010, 26(4): 106-110.
3. 赵坤, 郭君钰, 杨光, 等. Campbell 图书馆简介. 中国循证医学杂志, 2015, 15(1): 120-124.
4. Available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/about-us/what-is-social-science/social-science-disciplines/.
5. Available at: http://www.ccetchina.org/view/234.
6. 陈大国. 循证矫正的原则、方法与流程. 湖北警官学院学报, 2014, 3(3): 159-161.
7. 杨云峰. 循证矫正本土化研究-以江苏省监狱系统为例. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2014.
8. 周勇. 循证矫正若干问题探究. 中国司法, 2014, (1): 75-80.
9. Hargreaves DH. In defence of research for evidence‐based teaching: a rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. Br Educ Res J, 1997, 23(4): 405-419.
10. 梁有道. 中国循证教育的研究现状和策略. 南京: 第一届循证社会工作研究与证据合成国际研讨会会议壁报, 2017.
11. Fischer JCC. The effectiveness of social casework. New York: Thomas Publisher, 1976.
12. 何雪松. 证据为本的实践的兴起及其对中国社会工作发展的启示. 华东理工大学学报 (社会科学版), 2004, 19(1): 13-18.
13. 拜争刚, 吴淑婷, 齐铱. 循证理念和方法在中国社会工作领域的应用现状分析. 社会建设, 2017, 4(4): 57-66.
14. 齐铱. 循证理念和方法: 中国社会工作科学化和专业化发展的助推器. 社会建设, 2017, 4(4): 28-29.
15. Rousseau DM. Is there such a thing as " evidence-based management”. Acad Manage Rev, 2006, 31(3): 256-269.
16. 周志忍, 李乐. 循证决策: 国际实践、理论渊源与学术定位. 中国行政管理, 2013, 16(12): 23-27, 43.
17. 游洁, 拜争刚, 黄鹏, 等. 循证实践理念和方法在中国管理领域研究现状可视化分析. 河南大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 36(2): 91-97.
18. 李思源, 季婷, 拜争刚, 等. 循证实践在国内社会科学领域的研究现状分析. 中国社会医学杂志, 2017, 34(6): 223-226.
19. Chang J, Guan Z, Chi I, et al. Evidence-based practice in the health and social services in China: developments, strategies, and challenges. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2014, 12(1): 17-24.
20. Available at: http://www.evidencecollaborative.org/.
21. 杨克虎, 李秀霞, 拜争刚. 循证社会科学研究方法-系统评价与 Meta 分析. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 2018.

Previous Article
A registration analysis of hypertension-related clinical trials on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry
Next Article
Cochrane in 2017: opportunities in China

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Evidence-based social science: origin, condition and prospect

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content