• 1. Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
  • 2. Department of Spinal Surgery, Weifang People’s Hospital, Weifang, 261000, P.R.China;
WANG Guanglin, Email: wglfrank@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing blood transfusion and total blood loss in patients undergoing orthopaedic trauma surgery.Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases. A search for grey literature was also performed in American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA). The search time was up to June 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias, then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 softwares.Results A total of 10 studies were included, including 936 patients. The pooled results indicated that TXA group was superior to the control group in blood transfusion (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.63 to 0.89, P=0.001), the total blood loss (MD=–157.61, 95%CI –250.09 to –65.13, P=0.000 8) and the wound complications (RR=0.24, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.58, P=0.002). There was no significant difference in risk of thromboembolic events (RR=1.25, 95%CI 0.78 to 2.00, P=0.36) and the mortality (RR=0.81, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.66, P=0.57) between TXA and control group.Conclusions TXA can effectively reduce blood transfusion, total blood loss and wound complications in patients undergoing orthopedic trauma surgery. Furthermore, TXA does not significantly increase the incidence of thromboembolic events and mortality. Due to the limited quality of included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.

Citation: YAO Ruzhan, WANG Bingwu, PAN Hongfa, WANG Guanglin. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in orthopaedic trauma surgery: a meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019, 19(3): 331-337. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201808138 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy and safety of sufentanil versus fentanyl for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after cesarean section: a systematic review
  • Next Article

    Efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus traditional open surgery for benign thyroid nodules: a systematic review