1. |
Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, et al. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ, 2004, 328(7438): 514-517.
|
2. |
Kroll MW, Anderson KM, Supino CG, et al. Decline in defibrillation thresholds. Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Pace, 1993, 16(2): 213-217.
|
3. |
Weed DL, Hursting SD. Biologic plausibility in causal inference: current method and practice. Am J Epidemiol, 1998, 147(5): 415-425.
|
4. |
Weed DL. Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related. Int J Epidemiol, 2000, 29(3): 387-390.
|
5. |
Mignini LE, Latthe PM, Villar J, et al. Mapping the theories of preeclampsia: the role of homocysteine. Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 105(2): 411-425.
|
6. |
Mignini L, Villar J, Khan KS. Mapping the theories of pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of mechanisms of diseases. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 194(2): 317-321.
|
7. |
Carter RE, Woolson RF. Statistical design considerations for pilot studies transitioning therapies from the bench to the bedside. J Transl Med, 2004, 2(1): 37.
|
8. |
Hooijmans CR, Ritskes-Hoitinga M. Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research. Plos Med, 2013, 10(7): e1001482.
|
9. |
Roberts I, Kwan I, Evans P, et al. Does animal experimentation inform human healthcare? Observations from a systematic review of international animal experiments on fluid resuscitation. BMJ, 2002, 324(7335): 474.
|
10. |
De Vries R, Hooijmans CR, Langendam MW, et al. A protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies. Evidence-based Preclinical Medicine, 2015, 2(1): 1-9.
|
11. |
Hooijmans CR, Tillema A, Leenaars M, et al. Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in PubMed. Lab Anim, 2010, 44(3): 170-175.
|
12. |
Leenaars M, Hooijmans CR, van Veggel N, et al. A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies. Lab Anim, 2012, 46(1): 24-31.
|
13. |
Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RB, et al. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2014, 14(1): 43.
|
14. |
Vesterinen HM, Sena ES, Egan KJ, et al. Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide. J Neurosci Methods, 2014, 221(15): 92-102.
|
15. |
Hooijmans CR, Inthout J, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, et al. Meta-analyses of animal studies: an introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare. ILAR J, 2014, 55(3): 418-426.
|
16. |
Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ, 2001, 322(7278): 98-101.
|
17. |
Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches the GRADE working group. BMC Health Serv Res, 2004, 4(1): 38.
|
18. |
Wei D, Tang K, Wang Q, et al. The use of GRADE approach in systematic reviews of animal studies. J Evid Based Med, 2016, 9(2): 98-104.
|
19. |
Hooijmans CR, de Vries RBM, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, et al. GRADE Working Group. Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies. PLoS One, 2018, 13(1): e0187271.
|
20. |
Katsamakis S, Slot DE, Van der Sluis LW, et al. Histological responses of the periodontium to MTA: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol, 2013, 40(4): 334-344.
|
21. |
Khatib MN, Shankar A, Kirubakaran R, et al. Effect of ghrelin on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in experimental rat and mice models of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2015, 10(5): e0126697.
|
22. |
Leung MCP, Yip KK, Lam CT, et al. Acupuncture improves cognitive function: a systematic review. Neural Regen Res, 2013, 8(18): 1673-1684.
|
23. |
Festing MF, Altman DG. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. Ilar J, 2002, 43(4): 244.
|
24. |
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 383-394.
|
25. |
Krauth D, Woodruff TJ, Bero L. Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect, 2013, 121(9): 985-992.
|
26. |
Hooijmans CR, Van der Zee CE, Dederen PJ, et al. DHA and cholesterol containing diets influence Alzheimer-like pathology, cognition and cerebral vasculature in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. Neurobiol Dis, 2009, 33(3): 482-498.
|
27. |
Sena ES, van der Worp HB, Bath PM, et al. Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. Plos Biol, 2010, 8(3): e1000344.
|
28. |
Korevaar DA, Hooft L, ter Riet G. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments. Lab Anim, 2011, 45(4): 225-230.
|
29. |
Ter Riet G, Korevaar DA, Leenaars M, et al. Publication bias in laboratory animal research: a survey on magnitude, drivers, consequences and potential solutions. Plos One, 2012, 7(9): e43404.
|
30. |
Lorkeers SJ, Doevendans PA, Chamuleau SA. All preclinical trials should be registered in advance in an online registry. Eur J Clin Invest, 2014, 44(9): 891-892.
|
31. |
Woodruff TJ, Sutton P. The navigation guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect, 2014, 122(10): 1007-1104.
|