• Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
LI Zi, Email: lizihx@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objectives To systematically review the influence for catheter mechanical dysfunction of different peritoneal dialysis catheterization methods.Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on comparisons of different peritoneal dialysis catheterization from inception to March 31st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using ADDIS 1.16.6 software.Results A total of 33 studies (9 RCTs and 24 cohort studies) involving 3 301 patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that the incidence of catheter mechanical dysfunctionwas the least and had statistically significant difference compared with that in percutaneous catheterization (OR=3.60; 95%CI, 1.64 and 15.38) and open surgery catheterization (OR=5.86; 95%CI, 2.68 and 14.53). Percutaneous catheterization was superior to open surgery catheterization, but there was no significant difference.Conclusions Laparoscopic catheterization may be the best technique for catheter insertion in peritoneal dialysis considering catheter dysfunction. Each technology has its own advantages. Choice of insertion method should be based on the characteristics of both the patient and the insertion techniques.

Citation: QIU Xiao, YANG Lichuan, LI Zi. Comparison of different techniques for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion in catheter mechanical dysfunction: a network meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019, 19(6): 680-686. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201810049 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Efficacy of kinesio taping on post stroke shoulder pain: a meta-analysis
  • Next Article

    Enteral nutrition for severe acute pancreatitis within 48 hours after admission: a meta-analysis