LIN Mao 1,2,3,4 , JIANG Lucan 1,2,3,4 , ZENG Linan 1,2,3 , ZHANG Yang 1,2,3 , GUI Ge 1,2,3,4 , ZHANG Lingli 1,2,3
  • 1. Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
  • 2. Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
  • 3. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
  • 4. West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;
ZHANG Lingli, Email: zhanglingli@scu.edu.cn
Essential medicine; Accessibility; Assessment method; Index; Delphi; Expert consultation
10.7507/1672-2531.201902090
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables References Cited by

Objectives To provide methodology support for the tracking assessment of specific resolution execution through evidence-based construction of tracking assessment index system for resolution execution of WHO essential medicine accessibility resolution, so as to further promote and improve the establishment of national essential medicine policies, and offer a methodology reference to survey and assess the resolution executions in other public health fields.Methods A multi-disciplinary team was set up to preliminarily construct the index system by means of earlier system assessment index through index screening based on Delphi method. The weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process.Results After two rounds of expert consultation, the index system available for resolution execution measures and results of WHO essential medicine accessibility were established, including 9 indexes of resolution execution measures. Meanwhile, the execution results of index contained 4 first class indexes, 13 second class indexes and 36 third class indexes. Each of the indexes obtained its own weight according to degree of importance.Conclusions In this study, the assessment index for resolution execution of essential medicine accessibility is established, however, the empirical research is still required to further verify the scientificity as well as feasibility of this index system.

Citation： LIN Mao, JIANG Lucan, ZENG Linan, ZHANG Yang, GUI Ge, ZHANG Lingli. Construction of tracking assessment methods of resolution execution of WHO essential medicine accessibility. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019, 19(10): 1145-1150. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201902090 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Translation and interpretation of the European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma (the fifth edition)

  • Next Article

    Analysis of current status of pediatric internal medicine clinical practice guidelines published in journals of mainland China from 2010 to 2017