HUANG Qiao 1,2,3 , WANG Yu 1,2,3 , MA Wenhao 3 , WANG Yongbo 1,2,3 , LI Xuhui 1,2,3 , ZENG Xiantao 1,2,3,4 , JIN Yinghui 1,2,3
  • 1. Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, P. R. China;
  • 2. Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, P. R. China;
  • 3. Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, The Second Clinical College, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, P. R. China;
  • 4. Urology Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, P. R. China;
JIN Yinghui, Email: jinyinghui0301@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Based on previous evidence-based researches and teaching experience, our team conducted literature and book review, and summarized 4 requirements, 1) effect measure calculation and conversion, 2) registration of evidence-based research, 3) evidence-based research database and 4) quality evaluation tools and reporting guidelines. We developed an online platform of evidence-based medicine research helper using the front-end and back-end technology, which can be accessed using www.ebm-helper.cn. Currently, the online tool has included 46 scenarios for effect measure calculation and conversion, introduction of 7 evidence-based research registration platforms, 26 commonly used databases for evidence-based research and 29 quality evaluation tools and reporting guidelines. This online tool can help researchers to solve specific problems encountered in different stages of evidence-based medicine research. Promoting the application of this platform in evidence-based medicine will help researchers to use the tool scientifically and improve research efficiency.

Citation: HUANG Qiao, WANG Yu, MA Wenhao, WANG Yongbo, LI Xuhui, ZENG Xiantao, JIN Yinghui. Development and introduction of online evidence-based medicine research helper. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(12): 1483-1488. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202208041 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Statistical analysis of comparative diagnostic test accuracy study