LI Yuxin 1 , XIONG Jun 2,3 , ZHANG Zheng 2,3 , LIAO Kai 2,3 , ZHOU Xiaohong 2,3 , LI Jun 2,3 , XIANG Jie 2,3 , XU Lingling 2,3
  • 1. Graduate School, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330004, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Acupuncture Allergic Rhinitis, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330006, P. R. China;
  • 3. Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Evaluation of Chinese Medicine for Health in Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330006, P. R. China;
XIONG Jun, Email: xiongjun196071@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

According to the evidence pyramid model, systematic review (SR)/meta-analysis (MA) is one of the essential sources with a high level of clinical evidence. A high-quality SR/MA can effectively guide clinical decision-making and practice. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for Chinese herbal medicines (PRISMA-CHM) were officially published in 2020. In this study, based on research cases, the features of PRISMA-CHM were interpreted in detail, so as to help domestic users accurately grasp the details of the reports, in order to improve the quality of the reports of SR/MA of traditional Chinese medicine.

Citation: LI Yuxin, XIONG Jun, ZHANG Zheng, LIAO Kai, ZHOU Xiaohong, LI Jun, XIANG Jie, XU Lingling. Interpretation of the PRISMA extension for Chinese herbal medicine review (PRISMA-CHM). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(11): 1351-1359. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202303057 Copy

  • Previous Article

    Risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of exposures (ROBINS-E 2022): an interpretation
  • Next Article

    Thoughts and suggestions on the application of expert evidence in traditional Chinese medicine in clinical practice guidelines