Efficacy of PDA in the selection of treatment modalities for patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

YAO Wufeng ^1,3 ,  YANG Liping ^1,2 , QIN Zilan ^1,2 , LI Kan ³ , CHEN Hongzhuo ³ , CHEN Jie ³ , LIU Tianxi ³

1. School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
2. Department of General Surgery, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
3. Blood Purification Center, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

YANG Liping, Email: ylp0703@163.com

Keywords：

End-stage renal disease; Patient decision aids; Intervention effect; Systematic review; Randomized controlled trial

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202307020

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To systematically review the efficacy of patient decision aids (PDA) in the selection of treatment modalities for end-stage renal diseases. Methods The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objectives from inception to March 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was then performed. Results A total of 8 RCTs involving 1 544 patients were included. The systematic review results showed that PDA could improve patient knowledge, reduce patient decision-making conflict, and change patient decision-making discussion rate. Conclusion Current evidence shows that patients with end-stage renal diseases can benefit from PDA to improve their decision-making knowledge and reduce conflicts in their decisions, but its impact on the decision-making outcome index is limited.

Citation： YAO Wufeng, YANG Liping, QIN Zilan, LI Kan, CHEN Hongzhuo, CHEN Jie, LIU Tianxi. Efficacy of PDA in the selection of treatment modalities for patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2024, 24(1): 56-60. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202307020 Copy

1.	Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet, 2012, 379(9818): 815-822.
2.	Zhang L, Zhao MH, Zuo L, et al. China kidney disease network (CK-NET) 2015 annual data report. Kidney Int Suppl (2011), 2019, 9(1): e1-e81.
3.	National Kidney Foundation. Global facts: about kidney disease. 2022.
4.	National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Chronic kidney disease: assessment and management. 2021.
5.	Covic A, Bammens B, Lobbedez T, et al. Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010, 25(6): 1757-1759.
6.	中国医院协会血液净化中心分会和中关村肾病血液净化创新联盟"血液净化模式选择工作组". 血液净化模式选择专家共识. 中国血液净化, 2019, 18(7): 442-472.
7.	Mendelssohn DC, Malmberg C, Hamandi B. An integrated review of "unplanned" dialysis initiation: reframing the terminology to "suboptimal" initiation. BMC Nephrol, 2009, 10: 22.
8.	Moss AH. Revised dialysis clinical practice guideline promotes more informed decision-making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010, 5(12): 2380-2383.
9.	Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ, 2017, 359: j4891.
10.	Wallace C, Leask J, Trevena LJ. Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study. BMJ, 2006, 332(7534): 146-149.
11.	Su D, Zhang X, He K, et al. Individualized prediction of chronic kidney disease for the elderly in longevity areas in China: machine learning approaches. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 998549.
12.	Wong SPY, Oestreich T, Prince DK, et al. A patient decision aid about conservative kidney management in advanced kidney disease: a randomized pilot trial. Am J Kidney Dis, 2023, 82(2): 179-188.
13.	Subramanian L, Zhao J, Zee J, et al. Use of a decision aid for patients considering peritoneal dialysis and in-center hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis, 2019, 74(3): 351-360.
14.	Gordon EJ, Sohn MW, Chang CH, et al. Effect of a mobile web app on kidney transplant candidates' knowledge about increased risk donor kidneys: a randomized controlled trial. Transplantation, 2017, 101(6): 1167-1176.
15.	Eneanya ND, Percy SG, Stallings TL, et al. Use of a supportive kidney care video decision aid in older patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Nephrol, 2020, 51(9): 736-744.
16.	Brown L, Gardner G, Bonner A. A randomized controlled trial testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease. J Adv Nurs, 2019, 75(11): 3032-3044.
17.	Boulware LE, Ephraim PL, Ameling J, et al. Effectiveness of informational decision aids and a live donor financial assistance program on pursuit of live kidney transplants in African American hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol, 2018, 19(1): 107.
18.	Patzer RE, McPherson L, Basu M, et al. Effect of the iChoose Kidney decision aid in improving knowledge about treatment options among transplant candidates: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant, 2018, 18(8): 1954-1965.
19.	Ladin K, Tighiouart H, Bronzi O, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention to improve decision making for older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med, 2023, 176(1): 29-38.
20.	AlSagheir AI, Alrowais NA, Alkhudhair BK, et al. Comparing the use of Arabic decision aid to usual care. A multicenter randomized controlled trial for Arabic speaking metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J, 2020, 41(5): 499-507.
21.	Berlin NL, Tandon VJ, Hawley ST, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of decision aids to improve decision making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making, 2019, 39(1): 5-20.
22.	Gabel P, Edwards A, Kirkegaard P, et al. The LEAD trial-the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: a randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns, 2020, 103(2): 359-368.
23.	Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ, 2006, 333(7565): 417.
24.	Case BC, Qamer SZ, Gates EM, et al. Shared decision making in cardiovascular disease in the outpatient setting. JACC Case Rep, 2019, 1(2): 261-270.
25.	Doll JA, Jones WS, Lokhnygina Y, et al. PREPARED study: a study of shared decision-making for coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2019, 12(2): e005244.
26.	Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Torres-Castaño A, et al. Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2019, 19(1): 8.
27.	Sim JA, Shin JS, Park SM, et al. Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(9): 1974-1980.
28.	Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, et al. Changes in decisional conflict and decisional regret in patients with localised prostate cancer. J Clin Nurs, 2014, 23(13-14): 1959-1969.
29.	Logan S, Perz J, Ussher JM, et al. Systematic review of fertility-related psychological distress in cancer patients: informing on an improved model of care. Psychooncology, 2019, 28(1): 22-30.
30.	Purnell TS, Auguste P, Crews DC, et al. Comparison of life participation activities among adults treated by hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013, 62(5): 953-973.
31.	Weiner DE, Seliger SL. Cognitive and physical function in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2014, 23(3): 291-297.
32.	Farrell EH, Whistance RN, Phillips K, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of audio-visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice. Patient Educ Couns, 2014, 94(1): 20-32.

1. Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet, 2012, 379(9818): 815-822.
2. Zhang L, Zhao MH, Zuo L, et al. China kidney disease network (CK-NET) 2015 annual data report. Kidney Int Suppl (2011), 2019, 9(1): e1-e81.
3. National Kidney Foundation. Global facts: about kidney disease. 2022.
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Chronic kidney disease: assessment and management. 2021.
5. Covic A, Bammens B, Lobbedez T, et al. Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010, 25(6): 1757-1759.
6. 中国医院协会血液净化中心分会和中关村肾病血液净化创新联盟"血液净化模式选择工作组". 血液净化模式选择专家共识. 中国血液净化, 2019, 18(7): 442-472.
7. Mendelssohn DC, Malmberg C, Hamandi B. An integrated review of "unplanned" dialysis initiation: reframing the terminology to "suboptimal" initiation. BMC Nephrol, 2009, 10: 22.
8. Moss AH. Revised dialysis clinical practice guideline promotes more informed decision-making. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010, 5(12): 2380-2383.
9. Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ, 2017, 359: j4891.
10. Wallace C, Leask J, Trevena LJ. Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study. BMJ, 2006, 332(7534): 146-149.
11. Su D, Zhang X, He K, et al. Individualized prediction of chronic kidney disease for the elderly in longevity areas in China: machine learning approaches. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 998549.
12. Wong SPY, Oestreich T, Prince DK, et al. A patient decision aid about conservative kidney management in advanced kidney disease: a randomized pilot trial. Am J Kidney Dis, 2023, 82(2): 179-188.
13. Subramanian L, Zhao J, Zee J, et al. Use of a decision aid for patients considering peritoneal dialysis and in-center hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis, 2019, 74(3): 351-360.
14. Gordon EJ, Sohn MW, Chang CH, et al. Effect of a mobile web app on kidney transplant candidates' knowledge about increased risk donor kidneys: a randomized controlled trial. Transplantation, 2017, 101(6): 1167-1176.
15. Eneanya ND, Percy SG, Stallings TL, et al. Use of a supportive kidney care video decision aid in older patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Nephrol, 2020, 51(9): 736-744.
16. Brown L, Gardner G, Bonner A. A randomized controlled trial testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease. J Adv Nurs, 2019, 75(11): 3032-3044.
17. Boulware LE, Ephraim PL, Ameling J, et al. Effectiveness of informational decision aids and a live donor financial assistance program on pursuit of live kidney transplants in African American hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol, 2018, 19(1): 107.
18. Patzer RE, McPherson L, Basu M, et al. Effect of the iChoose Kidney decision aid in improving knowledge about treatment options among transplant candidates: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant, 2018, 18(8): 1954-1965.
19. Ladin K, Tighiouart H, Bronzi O, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention to improve decision making for older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med, 2023, 176(1): 29-38.
20. AlSagheir AI, Alrowais NA, Alkhudhair BK, et al. Comparing the use of Arabic decision aid to usual care. A multicenter randomized controlled trial for Arabic speaking metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J, 2020, 41(5): 499-507.
21. Berlin NL, Tandon VJ, Hawley ST, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of decision aids to improve decision making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making, 2019, 39(1): 5-20.
22. Gabel P, Edwards A, Kirkegaard P, et al. The LEAD trial-the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: a randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns, 2020, 103(2): 359-368.
23. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ, 2006, 333(7565): 417.
24. Case BC, Qamer SZ, Gates EM, et al. Shared decision making in cardiovascular disease in the outpatient setting. JACC Case Rep, 2019, 1(2): 261-270.
25. Doll JA, Jones WS, Lokhnygina Y, et al. PREPARED study: a study of shared decision-making for coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2019, 12(2): e005244.
26. Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Torres-Castaño A, et al. Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2019, 19(1): 8.
27. Sim JA, Shin JS, Park SM, et al. Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(9): 1974-1980.
28. Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, et al. Changes in decisional conflict and decisional regret in patients with localised prostate cancer. J Clin Nurs, 2014, 23(13-14): 1959-1969.
29. Logan S, Perz J, Ussher JM, et al. Systematic review of fertility-related psychological distress in cancer patients: informing on an improved model of care. Psychooncology, 2019, 28(1): 22-30.
30. Purnell TS, Auguste P, Crews DC, et al. Comparison of life participation activities among adults treated by hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013, 62(5): 953-973.
31. Weiner DE, Seliger SL. Cognitive and physical function in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2014, 23(3): 291-297.
32. Farrell EH, Whistance RN, Phillips K, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of audio-visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice. Patient Educ Couns, 2014, 94(1): 20-32.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Efficacy of PDA in the selection of treatment modalities for patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content