• 1.The First Department of General Surgery, The 152nd Hospital of PLA, Pingdingshan 467000, Henan Province, China;;
  • 2.Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Nantong University, Wuxi 214041, Jiangsu Province, China;
GU Yuanlong, Email: jsntdxwx@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

ObjectiveTo compare the advantages and disadvantages of transumbilical single port (TUSP) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsThe clinical data of 45 patients underwent elective LC were analyzed, 20 patients with TUSP LC (TUSP-LC group), 25 patients with conventional LC (conventional LC group). The operation time, Child-Pugh score and painkiller application frequency within three days after operation, the first time of out of bed and hospital stay after operation, intraoperative blood loss, chronic pain within one month after surgery were compared between two groups. ResultsAll cases were operated successfully except one patient in the conventional LC group. The frequency of painkiller application within three days after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the TUSP-LC group were better than those in the conventional LC group (P lt;0.05). There were no significant differences on postoperative chronic pain of surgical area within 1 month and Child-Pugh score between two groups (P gt;0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the conventional LC group were less than those in the TUSP-LC group (P lt;0.05, P lt;0.01). ConclusionTUSP LC has the advantages of small wound, slight pain, and fast recovery.

Citation: WANG Guangwei,GU Yuanlong,WU Xinggui,ZHAI Niankuan,LIU Minfeng.. Clinical Study on Transumbilical Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Comparing with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2011, 18(12): 1305-1308. doi: Copy