• Department of Respiratory Disease, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine. Shanghai, 200025, China;
SHI Guochao, Email: shiguochao@hotmail.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

【Abstract】Objective To explore the differential diagnostic value of major fibrinolytic parameters in pleural fluid. Methods Tissue-type plasminogen activator( t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1( PAI-1) in pleural fluid at the first thoracentesis were measured with ELISA and D-dimer was measured with immunoturbidimetry. Results Eighty-four patients with pleural effusion were enrolled, among which 40 with malignant effusion, 33 with infectious effusion and 11 with transudative effusion. t-PA level was higher in malignant and transudative pleural fluid than that in infectious pleural fluid[ ( 52. 49 ±31. 46) ng /mL and ( 58. 12 ±23. 14) ng /mL vs ( 37. 39 ±22. 44) ng /mL, P  lt; 0. 05] , but was not statistically different between malignant pleural fluid and transudative ( P  gt; 0. 05) . PAI-1 level was higher in malignant and infectious pleural fluid than that in transudative [ ( 164. 86 ±150. 22) ng/mL and ( 232. 42 ±175. 77) ng/mL vs ( 46. 38 ±16. 13) ng/mL, P  lt; 0. 01] , but was not statistically different between malignant and infectious pleural fluid( P  gt;0. 05) . D-dimer levels in the three types of pleural fluid were significantly different, which was ( 23. 66 ±25. 18) mg/L, ( 6. 36 ±10. 87) mg/L and ( 66. 90 ±42. 17) mg/L in malignant, transudative and infectious pleural fluid, respectively. As single-item detection for malignant pleural fluid, the cutoff of t-PA was  gt; 38. 7 ng/mL( area under ROC curve was 64. 0 ) , with sensitivity of 60. 0% , specificity of 63. 6%, positive predictive value of 66. 7%, negative predictive value of 56. 8% and accuracy of 61. 6% .The cutoff of D-dimer was  lt; 27. 0 mg/L( area under ROC curve was 85. 5) , with sensitivity of 84. 8% ,specificity of 72. 5% , positive predictive value of 85. 3% , negative predictive value of 71. 8% and accuracy of78.1%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of combined examination( t-PA + D-dimer) were 92. 5% , 60. 6% , 74. 0% , 87. 0% , 78. 1% , respectively.Conclusions The t-PA, PAI-1 and D-dimer levels are significantly different in the three types of pleural fluid. The detection of fibrinolytic parameters in pleural fluid, especially the value of D-dimer,may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion.

Citation: WANG Xi,SHI Guochao,LI Qingyun,HAN Li,WAN Huanying,DENG Weiwu.. The Differential Diagnostic Value of Major Fibrinolytic Parameters in Pleural Fluid. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2009, 09(2): 146-150. doi: Copy

  • Previous Article

    An Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine Glossary II
  • Next Article

    Organizing and Commanding the Medical Treatment of 1950 Injured Patients at the People’s Hospital of Deyang City following the Wenchuan Earthquake