CLINICAL OBSERVATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE STATUS OF ANKYLOS DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH COMPLETION OF RESTORATION_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

CHEN Tie , LI Yinghua , LI Zejian , LAI Renfa.

The Medical Center of Stomatology, the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510630, P.R.China.;

Corresponding author：

Keywords：

Dental implant; Dentition defect; Osseointegration; Alveolar bone resorption

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To provide basis for cl inical appl ication of ANKYLOS dental implants by following up alveolar bone status of 318 pieces of restored ANKYLOS dental implants. Methods Between February 2008 and August 2009, 170 patients with dentition defect underwent placement of ANKYLOS dental implants (318 pieces). There were 74 males (133 pieces) and 96 females (185 pieces) with an average age of 43.8 years (range, 23-68 years). After operation, the periapical
X-ray films were taken to observe osseointegration around the neck of implant, alveolar bone resorption, and survival of
implants. Results All patients were followed up at 6, 12, and 24 months after operation. There were 9 failure implants with
a total dental implants survival rate of 97.17% (309/318): 3 at 6 months, 4 at 6-12 months, and 2 at 12-24 months, showing no significant difference in dental implants survival rate among 3 time points (χ2=0.470 3, P=0.492 8). New bone formed around the neck of implant in 4 cases at 6 months and in 31 cases at 12 months; at 6, 12, and 24 months, the bone increase was (0.392 7 ± 0.217 4), (0.633 5 ± 0.202 1), and (0.709 0 ± 0.199 1) mm, respectively, showing significant differences among 3 time points (P lt; 0.05). At 6, 12, and 24 months after operation, the bone loss of other patients was (0.392 7 ± 0.217 4), (0.716 7 ± 0.220 3), and (0.723 2 ± 0.215 4) mm, respectively, showing significant differences among 3 time points (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion After restoration with ANKYLOS dental implant, alveolar bone status is good and the implant success rate is high during short-term follow-up. But further observation and study are required for long-term effectivness.

Citation： CHEN Tie,LI Yinghua,LI Zejian,LAI Renfa.. CLINICAL OBSERVATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE STATUS OF ANKYLOS DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH COMPLETION OF RESTORATION. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012, 26(6): 712-718. doi: Copy

1.	da Cunha HA, Filho HN, Batista JG, et al. Segmental osteotomy for the correction of a malpositioned single implant: an 8-year follow-up. Quintessence Int, 2011, 42(10): 817-822.
2.	Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous Jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1990, 5(4): 347-359.
3.	Demenko V, Linetskiy I, Nesvit K, et al. Ultimate masticatory force as a criterion in implant selection. J Dent Res, 2011, 90(10): 1211-1215.
4.	Ida JB, Mansfield S, Meinzen-Derr JK, et al. Complications in pediatric osseointegrated implantation. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg, 2011, 144(4): 586-591.
5.	Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2000, 15(6): 831-836.
6.	Oh GY, Park SH, Kim SG. Influence of implant fixture design on implant primary stability. J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 2007, 45(1): 98-106.
7.	Akkocaoglu M, Uysal S, Tekdemir I, et al. Implant design and intraosseous stability of immediately placed implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(2): 202-209.
8.	Enkling N, Joehren P, Klimberg T, et al. Open or submerged healing of implants with platform switching: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol, 2011, 38(4): 374-384.
9.	Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, et al. Biologic width around one- and two-piece Titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001, 12(6): 559-571.
10.	Weber HP, Buser D, Donath K, et al. Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded Titanium dental implants. A histometric study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7: 11-19.
11.	Brägger U, Hirt-Steiner S, Schnell N, et al. Complication and failure rates of fixed dental prostheses in patients treated for periodontal disease. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(1): 70-77.
12.	Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1986, 1(1): 11-25.
13.	López-Marí L, Calvo-Guirado JL, Martín-Castellote B, et al. Implant platform switching concept: an updated review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2009, 14(9): e450-e454.
14.	Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2006, 26(1): 9-17.
15.	Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. Immediate versus one-stage restoration of small-diameter implants for a single missing maxillary lateral incisor: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol, 2009, 80(9): 1393-1398.
16.	Vela-Nebot X, Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, et al. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent, 2006, 15(3): 313-320.
17.	Cavalcanti R, Oreglia F, Manfredonia MF, et al. The influence of smoking on the survival of dental implants: a 5-year pragmatic multicentre retrospective cohort study of 1727 patients. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2011, 4(1): 39-45.
18.	Hna CH. Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1998, 9(1): l-10.
19.	Matarasso S, Rasperini G, Iorio Siciliano V, et al. A 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010, 21(9): 898-903.
20.	García-Bellosta S, Bravo M, Subirá C, et al. Retrospective study of the long-term survival of 980 implants placed in a periodontal practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(3): 613-619.
21.	Craig RG, Legeros RZ. Early events associated with periodontal connective tissue attachment formation on Titanium and hydroxyapatite surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res, 1999, 47(4): 585-594.
22.	Del Acqua MA, Chavez AM, Castanharo SM, et al. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(6): 1153-1158.

1. da Cunha HA, Filho HN, Batista JG, et al. Segmental osteotomy for the correction of a malpositioned single implant: an 8-year follow-up. Quintessence Int, 2011, 42(10): 817-822.
2. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous Jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1990, 5(4): 347-359.
3. Demenko V, Linetskiy I, Nesvit K, et al. Ultimate masticatory force as a criterion in implant selection. J Dent Res, 2011, 90(10): 1211-1215.
4. Ida JB, Mansfield S, Meinzen-Derr JK, et al. Complications in pediatric osseointegrated implantation. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg, 2011, 144(4): 586-591.
5. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2000, 15(6): 831-836.
6. Oh GY, Park SH, Kim SG. Influence of implant fixture design on implant primary stability. J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 2007, 45(1): 98-106.
7. Akkocaoglu M, Uysal S, Tekdemir I, et al. Implant design and intraosseous stability of immediately placed implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(2): 202-209.
8. Enkling N, Joehren P, Klimberg T, et al. Open or submerged healing of implants with platform switching: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol, 2011, 38(4): 374-384.
9. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, et al. Biologic width around one- and two-piece Titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001, 12(6): 559-571.
10. Weber HP, Buser D, Donath K, et al. Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded Titanium dental implants. A histometric study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7: 11-19.
11. Brägger U, Hirt-Steiner S, Schnell N, et al. Complication and failure rates of fixed dental prostheses in patients treated for periodontal disease. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(1): 70-77.
12. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1986, 1(1): 11-25.
13. López-Marí L, Calvo-Guirado JL, Martín-Castellote B, et al. Implant platform switching concept: an updated review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2009, 14(9): e450-e454.
14. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2006, 26(1): 9-17.
15. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. Immediate versus one-stage restoration of small-diameter implants for a single missing maxillary lateral incisor: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol, 2009, 80(9): 1393-1398.
16. Vela-Nebot X, Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, et al. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent, 2006, 15(3): 313-320.
17. Cavalcanti R, Oreglia F, Manfredonia MF, et al. The influence of smoking on the survival of dental implants: a 5-year pragmatic multicentre retrospective cohort study of 1727 patients. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2011, 4(1): 39-45.
18. Hna CH. Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1998, 9(1): l-10.
19. Matarasso S, Rasperini G, Iorio Siciliano V, et al. A 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010, 21(9): 898-903.
20. García-Bellosta S, Bravo M, Subirá C, et al. Retrospective study of the long-term survival of 980 implants placed in a periodontal practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(3): 613-619.
21. Craig RG, Legeros RZ. Early events associated with periodontal connective tissue attachment formation on Titanium and hydroxyapatite surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res, 1999, 47(4): 585-594.
22. Del Acqua MA, Chavez AM, Castanharo SM, et al. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(6): 1153-1158.

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

CLINICAL OBSERVATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE STATUS OF ANKYLOS DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH COMPLETION OF RESTORATION

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Format

Content