Objective To explore the biomechanical difference between the different fixations of cortical bone plate allograft. Methods Twenty-seven cadaveric femurs were harvested and were made into the simulated fracture models, which were equally divided into Groups A, B and C. In Group A, the models were fixed with 2 bone plate allografts (110 mm×10 mm×3 mm); in Group B, the models were fixed with 2 struts (110 mm×10 mm×3 mm) and 5 bone screws; in Group C, the models were fixed with 1 strut (110 mm×10 mm×3 mm) and 5 bone screws. The biomechanical tests for the three-piont bending, torsion, and compression were performed. The parameters studied included the values of the displacements in the three-piont bending tests and the compression tests, and the maximum loads during the bending, the compression, and the torsion. Results As for all the stiffness parameters tested, Group A showed the greatest displacements among the threegroups(P<0.05), except the compressive stiffness parameter, which was similar to that in Group B. The maximum loads of the three-point bending, the torsion, and the compression in Group A were 1.65±0.34 kN, 554.3±49.34 N, and 7.78±0.82 Nm, respectively; in Group B, they were 1.12±0.37 kN, 428.00±37.40 N,and 3.39±0.22 Nm, respectively; in Group C, they were 0.71±0.46 kN, 218.67±36.53N, and 1.74±0.12 Nm, respectively. Group A had a significantly greater strengththan the other 2 groups(P<0.05). Conclusion The strength of the cortical bone plate allograft is related to its different fixations. The two cortical bone plate allografts have a greater strength and stiffness than the struts fixed with the bone screws, which can meet the clinical requirement.
Citation: ZHANG Renming,LIAO Ying,LI Baoxing,et al.. A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY ON DIFFERENT FIXATION OF CORTICAL BONE PLATE ALLOGRAFT. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2007, 21(8): 793-793. doi: Copy