TANG Zhaohui , HOU Chunlin , CHEN Qingquan.
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Changzheng Hospital of the Second Military Medical University. Shanghai, P. R. China 200003;
Chitosan; Sodium hyaluronate; Bacteriostasis; Comparison
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables References Cited by

Objective To compare the effect and coverage of bacteriostasis of chitosan and sodium hyaluronate. Methods Each of the five bacteria, Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, was cultivated for 33 tubes of broth culture. Leaving three tubes each group as control group, ploidy diluted concentration of high relative molecular weight chitosan, low relative molecular weight chitosan and sodium hyaluronate were added respectively in the broth culture. All the tubes were cultivated for 18 hours at 37 ℃ with homeothermia. Then the growth of bacteria was observed. ResultsThe minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of high relative molecular weight chitosan were : Proteus mirabilis 0.031%, Escherichia coli 0.063%, Candida albicans 0.063%, Pseudomonas aerugionosa 0.063%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.063%; and the MIC of low relative molecular weight chitosan were: Proteus mirabilis 0.125%, Escherichia coli 0.025%, Candida albicans 0.25%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0.25%, Staphylococcus aureus 0.125%; bacteria grew well in each tube of sodium hyaluronate group and control group. Conclusion The above results show that sodium hyaluronate has no bacteriostasis, while chitosan has bacteriostasison broad spectrum and high relative molecular weight chitosan has ber effect.

Citation： TANG Zhaohui,HOU Chunlin,CHEN Qingquan.. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BACTERIOSTASIS OF CHITOSAN AND SODIUM HYALURONATE. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2002, 16(4): 259-261. doi: Copy