Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of fructose-1,6 diphosphate (FDP) in the treatment of cerebral infarction.
Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, CBM and CNKI in 2006. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) or quasi-randomized controlled trials involving FDP for cerebral infarction were collected. We assessed the quality of the studies and conducted meta-analyse with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.
Results Ten RCTs were included, 9 of which were of low quality and only one was graded as high quality. None of the trials reported the number of patients who had died or were dependent at the end of long term follow-up. After 7 to 30 days of treatment, improvement of neurological deficiency was associated with FDP compared with placebo or control [OR 2.45, 95%CI (1.91,3.15)]. There was no statistical difference in the death rate between the FDP and control groups at the end of the treatment [RD –0.01, 95%CI (–0.03,0.01)]. One study found that FDP had a similar safety profile [OR 1.24, 95%CI (0.32,4.75)] to the control group. None of the trials compared the costs in the treatment groups.
Conclusions The quality of the published clinical trials on FDP in the treatment of cerebral infarction is poor. FDP may improve short-term neurological deficits, but seems unlikely to decrease mortality. Moreover, we found no evidence to support the long-term efficacy of FDP on mortality, dependency and neurological deficit. Large-scale and high quality clinical trials with sufficient follow-ups are needed to evaluate the role of FDP in the treatment of cerebral infarction.
Citation： LIU Fang,ZHAI Suodi,ZHAO Rui,SHU Zhan. Fructose-1,6 Diphosphate for Cerebral Infarction: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2007, 07(4): 283-288. doi: Copy