• 1. Geriatric Department of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China2. School of Insurance, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610071, China;
DONG Birong, Email: birongdong@hotmail.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To access the efficacy and safety of different doses of metoprolol for patients with chronic heart failure.
Methods  We searched databases such as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM and CMCC. The search was conducted in March 2006. Randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, and current guidelines of chronic heart failure were reviewed. The efficacy and safety of the high-dose (≥100 mg/d) and low-dose metoprolol ( lt;100 mg/d) were compared.
Results  Only one small-scale, short-term randomised trial met our inclusion criteria. This found that metoprolol 100 mg/d was more effective than 25 mg/d and 50 mg/d. A sub-group analysis of MERIT-HF recommended individualized titration for drug administration. Most guidelines suggested that the administration of metoprolol CR/XL for chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be performed by titrating up to 200 mg/d or the maximum tolerance dose. Patients receiving 100 mg/d might have more adverse events than those receiving a lower dose than this. However, in the long-term, it’s the benefits of high-dose treatment outweighed its risks. Race-related differences in tolerance or dose-related adverse effects were not found.
Conclusion  We couldn’t determine an optimal dose based on the existing evidence, but a target dose of metoprolol CR/XL 200 mg/d is safe and effective. We are unable to draw any conclusions about the relationship between dose and adverse effects.

Citation: ZHOU Yan,YANG Ming,CHEN Tao,DONG Birong. Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Metoprolol for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2007, 07(6): 472-477. doi: Copy