• 1. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China2. Center for Drug Evaluation,State Food and Drug Administration,China3. Center for Pharmacoeconomics,Warsaw,Poland;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To critically appraise and systematically reviewe the economic evaluations of all alternative interventions for hepatitis B in China.
Methods  We searched MEDLINE and the four largest Chinese electronic databases. The references of eligible studies were also screened. Economic evaluations of any type, which studied interventions for hepatitis B, were eligible for inclusion. A 25-item quality checklist modified from a BMJ checklist was used to appraise the quality of studies. The overall quality score was calculated against 100 points to indicate the risk of bias. Quality appraisal and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers.
Results  Nineteen full economic evaluations and two cost studies were included of which fourteen studies were scored 25-44 points, and seven scored 45-61 points. Most studies adequately documented effectiveness of interventions. However, the costs of interventions were not well reported in over 50% of studies. Many studies inadequately conducted data analysis, particular in sensitivity analysis and discounting. Ten studies compared lamivudine with interferon or conventional therapy for 1-year (or 6-month) effects, which indicated that lamivudine was generally cost-effective. Three evaluations studied 30-year outcomes of interferon compared with conventional therapy, which suggested that interferon usually saved additional costs and years of life. Another three studies compared interferon with less frequently used antiviral agents, however the comparative cost-effectiveness varied. Two cost studies showed the total costs and the percentage of medical costs increased rapidly in proportion to disease severity.
Conclusions  Of alternative interventions, lamivudine is cost effective for short-term effects. Interferon is superior to conventional therapy for long-term outcomes. However, the long-term economic outcomes cannot be justified by the current evidence. Quality of methods, particularly, that of costing and analytical methods, is a major limitation. There remains a b need to improve the quality of reporting. Careful considerations should be paid before applying the results to decision making.

Citation: SUN Xin,YANG Huan,WANG Li,Ewa Orlewska,Li Youping. Cost-effectiveness of Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in China: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2005, 05(11): 833-845. doi: Copy